lion: the general word for the great predator of the biblical world, and the Bible's standard picture of overwhelming power, whether admired in a king or feared in an enemy
This is the everyday Hebrew word for a lion, and the most common of the several words the Bible uses for the animal. It comes in a shorter and a longer spelling, but they are one and the same word. Lions were a real presence in the land: they lay up in the thickets along the Jordan, they took sheep out of the flock, and they killed people. Samson met one in the vineyards, David says he pulled lambs out of a lion's jaws, and the writers speak of lions with the plainness of people who knew the danger firsthand.
Because the lion was simply the strongest and most frightening animal anyone knew, it became the Bible's most flexible image of power, and it points in opposite directions depending on who is being described:
- for a tribe, a king, or a brave soldier it is a compliment, the strength nobody dares challenge
- for an oppressor it is terror, the ambush in the tall grass, the empire that swallows a nation whole
- for God it is the most startling of all, the LORD who roars, springs, and carries off prey that no one can rescue
The word also names the lion as a made thing and as a face in a vision: the twelve lions on the steps of Solomon's throne, the lions worked into the temple stands, the lion face on the creatures Ezekiel saw. And in a few stories a lion is God's own instrument of punishment, killing a man who disobeyed a word from the LORD and then standing quietly beside the body.
All of this is one animal seen in different lights, so the surrounding lines, not the word itself, tell you whether a flesh-and-blood lion is in view or the lion is standing in for a person, a nation, or God.
Nuances
Whether Psalm 22:16 (Hebrew 22:17) reads כָּאֲרִי, "like a lion," or a verb form (כָּארוּ / כָּרוּ), "they have dug" or "pierced."
- contestedThe Masoretic reading "like a lion" should be retained: leonine imagery permeates the psalm and coheres with vv. 14 and 22 (Eng. 13 and 21), even though the syntax is difficult and a verb may have dropped out. The Nahal Hever scribe who writes כארו also misspells the very next word (ידיה for ידי), which weakens the fragment as evidence.; Brent A. Strawn, "Psalm 22:17b: More Guessing," JBL 119 (2000): 439-451
- contestedThe original text carried a verb, "they have dug" or "pierced," as reflected in the Septuagint's ὤρυξαν and in the Nahal Hever Psalms fragment (5/6HevPs), which reads כארו.; Peter W. Flint, The Dead Sea Psalms Scrolls and the Book of Psalms (STDJ 17; Leiden: Brill, 1997)