StrongerBible

avaqah

אֲבָקָה

HebrewH0081powder, fragrant powder

Appears 1 time · tap a cell to see the verses

Sng 3:6
Root family
Word studyResearch-gradeah-vah-KAHnoun

What avaqah means

aromatic powder: fragrant spice ground fine and sold by traveling merchants

TranslatabilityPartialCertaintySettled

This word names a fragrant spice that has been pounded into a fine powder and carried for sale by traveling merchants. It appears only once in the whole Bible, in a wedding song where a figure comes up from the wilderness in a rising column of smoke, "perfumed with myrrh and frankincense, with all the scented powders of the merchant" (Song of Songs 3:6).

It is the feminine form of a more common word for dust (אָבָק), the fine, dry, wind-blown kind that hangs in the air. Everywhere else that dust word turns up it belongs to scenes of dread: the choking soot of a plague, the dust-storm of a curse, the cloud kicked up by a charging army, even the dust beneath God's own advancing feet. Here, and only here, the same picture of fine airborne particles is turned toward luxury: not the dust of judgment but the perfumed haze of costly, imported spice.

The fragrance comes from the setting, not from the bare word. Set beside the traveling merchant who moved myrrh, frankincense, and pounded aromatics along the caravan routes, the powder is unmistakably a luxury cosmetic good, close kin to the world of balsam-spice (בֹּשֶׂם) that fills the rest of the Song. Ancient translators felt the strain of the double sense: the old Greek and Latin versions kept the ordinary word for "dust" and let the phrase "of the merchant" carry the scent, while the Syriac reached instead for its own word that already meant "spice-powder."

Sng 3:6

What scholars say about avaqah

Every major lexicon glosses אֲבָקָה as "aromatic/scented powder," a feminine formation from the masculine אָבָק "fine airborne dust" (BDB, "powders of merchant = scent-powders"; HALOT; DCH; Gesenius). The feminine ending is understood, following Lagarde's classic study of Hebrew nominal morphology (1889, cited in BDB), as deriving a technical or collective noun rather than merely inflecting for gender, so the word denotes prepared spice-powder as a trade good rather than dust as such; the aromatic sense is reinforced by the construct with רוֹכֵל, the itinerant spice-peddler of the South Arabian caravan trade (Pope, drawing on Rabin; Murphy; Fox; Longman; Delitzsch). The masculine אָבָק occurs six times, always of airborne, dispersible dust in negative or awe-inducing settings (plague, Exodus 9:9; treaty-curse, Deuteronomy 28:24, cf. Weinfeld; winnowing imagery, Isaiah 5:24 and 29:5; cavalry, Ezekiel 26:10; theophany, Nahum 1:3), against which the Song's single feminine form stands out as its lone positive, sensuous use. The ancient versions diverge: the Septuagint and Vulgate keep the ordinary dust-word (κονιορτός; pulvis) and let the following genitive ("of the perfumer/merchant") carry the fragrance, the Peshitta substitutes a Syriac noun already meaning "spice-powder," and the Targum to Canticles allegorizes the phrase as the incense of spices. Two questions remain open, but neither bears on the sense in Song 3:6: whether אבק "wrestle" (Genesis 32) is denominative from אבק "dust" (one root: BDB, Gesenius, Klein) or an unrelated homonym possibly tied instead to a root "embrace/entwine" (two roots: HALOT, DCH, TWOT, NIDOTTE); and whether the prefixed מ־ in מִכֹּל אַבְקַת רוֹכֵל is partitive ("with every powder," the majority, including Alter) or comparative ("more fragrant than every powder," Bloch and Bloch).

Where scholars disagree about avaqah

Whether the root אבק behind this word is a single root that also yields the verb "to wrestle" (Genesis 32), or two unrelated homonyms that merely look alike. The question concerns the word's derivation and wider family, not the agreed sense "aromatic powder" in Song of Songs 3:6.

  • contestedOne root: the verb "to wrestle" is denominative from the noun for dust, literally "to get dusty" in a grapple, with the Greek pair κόνις / κονίω ("dust" / "wrestle in dust") cited as a semantic parallel.; BDB, s.v. אבק; Gesenius (trans. Tregelles), s.v. אבק; Ernest Klein, A Comprehensive Etymological Dictionary of the Hebrew Language, s.v. אבק
  • contestedTwo unrelated roots: "dust" and "wrestle" are distinct homonyms, the latter possibly linked instead to a root meaning "embrace, entwine."; HALOT, 1:9 (I אבק vs. II אבק); DCH, s.v. אבק I, II; TWOT §11-12; NIDOTTE, s.v. אבק
In-depth research

This is a research paper, so it may be hard to read without scholarly background. It is useful if you want to dig even deeper into this word.

Sources

  • BDB, s.v. אֲבָקָהlexicon
  • HALOT, s.v. אֲבָקָהlexicon
  • DCH, s.v. אֲבָקָהlexicon
  • Gesenius (trans. Tregelles), s.v. אֲבָקָהlexicon
  • Paul de Lagarde, Übersicht über die im Aramäischen, Arabischen und Hebräischen übliche Bildung der Nomina (Göttingen, 1889), §81monograph
  • Marvin H. Pope, Song of Songs (Anchor Bible 7C; Doubleday, 1977)commentary
  • Roland E. Murphy, The Song of Songs (Hermeneia; Fortress, 1990)commentary
  • Michael V. Fox, The Song of Songs and the Ancient Egyptian Love Songs (University of Wisconsin Press, 1985)monograph
  • Tremper Longman III, Song of Songs (NICOT; Eerdmans, 2001)commentary
  • Franz Delitzsch, Commentary on the Song of Songs and Ecclesiastes (T&T Clark, 1877)commentary
  • Ariel Bloch and Chana Bloch, The Song of Songs: A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary (Random House, 1995)commentary
  • Moshe Weinfeld, "Traces of Assyrian Treaty Formulae in Deuteronomy," Biblica 46 (1965): 417-27article

All attested forms of אֲבָקָה

f s construct

אַבְקַת

Sng 3:6