StrongerBible

avaq

אָבַק

HebrewH0079wrestle

Appears 2 times · tap a cell to see the verses

Gen 32:24(25)Gen 32:25(26)
Root family
Word studyResearch-gradeah-VAHKverb

What avaq means

to wrestle: to grapple bodily with an opponent, locked in a hold neither side will release

TranslatabilityApproximateCertaintyStrong

This verb names the physical grip of a wrestling match, two people fastened onto each other and straining until one gives way. It appears in exactly one scene in the whole Bible. Jacob, alone at the ford of the Jabbok on the night before he must face his brother Esau, is seized by a stranger who holds him until daybreak (Genesis 32:24, 32:25). The word describes only the hold itself. It says nothing about who the opponent is, and nothing about who wins.

Where the word came from is genuinely debated, and three explanations circulate:

  • Most scholars connect it to the noun for fine, flying dust (אָבָק), so that wrestling is named for the cloud two grappling bodies kick up; Greek built its own word for wrestling from its word for dust in just this way.
  • Some trace it instead to an Aramaic word for twisting or knotting two things together, which would make the picture one of bodies tangled tight rather than dusty.
  • Others argue the storyteller reached for a rare, half-opaque word chiefly for the sound of it, and that hunting for its origin misses the point.

What the word means in the scene is not in doubt, whichever origin is right: the ancient translators rendered it "wrestled" and every modern version follows them. Its real force is in its sound. Within three verses the storyteller sets Jacob's name, the name of the river Jabbok, and this verb side by side, three words shaped from nearly the same handful of consonants, exactly where Jacob is about to be renamed Israel. The night is then summed up with a different verb altogether (שָׂרָה), the one that explains the new name: you have struggled with God and with people, and have prevailed.

The sound-play reaches into the next morning. Esau runs to Jacob and throws his arms around him, and the word for that embrace (חָבַק) is a near twin of this one, differing by a single consonant. The grip that would not let go in the dark is answered by a brother's arms at dawn.

Gen 32:24(25)Gen 32:25(26)

Disputed

Where the wrestling verb in Genesis 32:24-25 comes from, and therefore what image lies behind it: dust raised by grappling bodies, an Aramaic sense of entwining, or a rare word chosen mainly for its sound. All parties agree the contextual meaning is "wrestle."

  • majorityThe verb is denominative from the noun אָבָק ("fine dust"), so literally something like "to get oneself dusty," on the model of Greek παλαίω / κονίομαι built from κόνις ("dust").; BDB (Brown-Driver-Briggs), s.v. אבק; HALOT (Koehler-Baumgartner) 1.6, s.v. אבק; Wilhelm Gesenius, Hebraisches und Aramaisches Handworterbuch, 18th ed. (Meyer/Donner), s.v. אבק; Robin Wakely, "אבק," NIDOTTE 1:246-247
  • minorityThe verb is an Aramaic loan meaning "to attach, entwine, knot," as in b. Hullin 91a and Rashi's gloss; the picture is bodies tangled together rather than dust raised.; E. A. Speiser, Genesis, Anchor Bible 1 (Doubleday, 1964), 255; Victor P. Hamilton, The Book of Genesis, Chapters 18-50, NICOT (Eerdmans, 1995)
  • minorityThe etymology is not recoverable and not the point: the narrator chose a rare, opaque verb to generate the wordplay on יַעֲקֹב / יַבֹּק / וַיֵּאָבֵק, so the verb's sense is negotiated by its sonic neighbors.; Herbert Marks, "Biblical Naming and Poetic Etymology," Journal of Biblical Literature 114 (1995): 21-42; Stephen A. Geller, "The Struggle at the Jabbok: The Uses of Enigma in a Biblical Narrative," JANES 14 (1982): 37-60; Robert Alter, Genesis: Translation and Commentary (Norton, 1996)

What scholars say about avaq

The verb occurs only in the Niphal and only twice, both in the Jabbok pericope (Genesis 32:25-26 in Hebrew numbering, 32:24-25 in English). Every major Genesis commentator, Gunkel, Speiser, von Rad, Westermann, Sarna, Wenham, Hamilton, Waltke, Alter, and Mathews, renders it "wrestled" or "grappled," following the Septuagint's epalaien and the Vulgate's luctabatur; the debate concerns derivation, not sense. BDB, HALOT (1.6), Gesenius 18, and NIDOTTE (Wakely) take it as denominative from the noun אָבָק ("fine dust"), citing the Greek parallel of παλαίω and κονίομαι from κόνις; Gesenius explicitly glosses the reciprocal Niphal as wrestling in which dust is raised. A minority derivation, attested in b. Hullin 91a and preferred by Rashi (lešon wayyitqašer), takes אבק as an Aramaic root for attaching or entwining; Speiser and Hamilton judge this philologically stronger than the dust link and downplay the latter. An older midrashic line, revived with appeal to Akkadian epequ ("to embrace, enclose"), reads the infinitive as embracing on the assumption of an aleph/het interchange with חבק, which is exegetically suggestive because Esau wayehabbeqehu in Genesis 33:4, though no mainstream critical commentary treats "embrace" as the verb's primary sense. Marks (JBL 114 [1995]: 21-42) and Geller (JANES 14 [1982]: 37-60) argue that poetic etymology, the sonic knot of יַעֲקֹב, יַבֹּק, and וַיֵּאָבֵק, is doing more work than any historical derivation, and Geller holds the verb's opacity is itself the narrative point. The lexica also divide on lexeme identity: BDB, HALOT, Gesenius, NIDOTTE, TDOT, and TLOT treat noun and verb as one root, while TWOT and, in effect, DCH list them as homonyms; both camps agree the verb's sense must be recovered from context. On the identity of the opponent, Gunkel's river-numen reading, the theophanic reading of the received text supported by Hosea 12:4-5 and the naming of Peniel (Hamori's אִישׁ-theophany category), Barthes' structuralist reading of the pronominal ambiguity, and psychological readings all remain live, but none turns on the lexical semantics of this verb.

In-depth research

This is a research paper, so it may be hard to read without scholarly background. It is useful if you want to dig even deeper into this word.

Sources

  • BDB (Brown-Driver-Briggs), s.v. אבקlexicon
  • HALOT (Koehler-Baumgartner) 1.6, s.v. אבקlexicon
  • DCH (Clines, ed.) 1:104-105, s.v. אבקlexicon
  • Wilhelm Gesenius, Hebraisches und Aramaisches Handworterbuch, 18th ed. (Meyer/Donner), s.v. אבקlexicon
  • Robin Wakely, "אבק," NIDOTTE 1:246-247dictionary
  • R. Laird Harris, Gleason L. Archer, and Bruce K. Waltke, Theological Wordbook of the Old Testament (TWOT), s.v. אבקdictionary
  • E. A. Speiser, Genesis, Anchor Bible 1 (Doubleday, 1964)commentary
  • Victor P. Hamilton, The Book of Genesis, Chapters 18-50, NICOT (Eerdmans, 1995)commentary
  • Gordon J. Wenham, Genesis 16-50, WBC 2 (Word, 1994), 295commentary
  • Nahum M. Sarna, Genesis, JPS Torah Commentary (1989)commentary
  • Claus Westermann, Genesis 12-36: A Commentary (Augsburg, 1985)commentary
  • Robert Alter, Genesis: Translation and Commentary (Norton, 1996)commentary
  • Herbert Marks, "Biblical Naming and Poetic Etymology," Journal of Biblical Literature 114 (1995): 21-42article
  • Stephen A. Geller, "The Struggle at the Jabbok: The Uses of Enigma in a Biblical Narrative," JANES 14 (1982): 37-60article
  • S. H. Smith, "'Heel' and 'Thigh': The Concept of Sexuality in the Jacob-Esau Narratives," Vetus Testamentum 40 (1990): 464-473article
  • Esther J. Hamori, "When Gods Were Men": The Embodied God in Biblical and Near Eastern Literature, BZAW 384 (de Gruyter, 2008)monograph

All attested forms of אָבַק

niphal consecutive-imperfect 3ms

וַיֵּאָבֵק

Gen 32:24

niphal infinitive-construct construct

הֵאָבְק

Gen 32:25