StrongerBible

spilos

σπίλος

GreekG4696spot, blemish

Appears 2 times · tap a cell to see the verses

Eph 5:272Pe 2:13
Root family
Word studyResearch-gradeSPEE-lossnoun

What spilos means

a spot or stain: a blemish that mars something otherwise clean, used morally of the corruption that spoils a person or a community

TranslatabilityApproximateCertaintySettled

This was an ordinary, everyday word in the Greek-speaking world. It named:

  • the spot you notice on someone's cheek
  • the stain on a linen shirt
  • the fleck on a slab of marble
  • a mark on the moon

It was not a religious or ceremonial term; it belonged to plain sensory life, and both New Testament writers who use it reach for exactly that vividness.

In the New Testament the word is always figurative, and its two appearances turn the same picture in slightly different directions. In one, the stain is what a spotless bride does not have: the church is presented perfect, without a single mark. In the other, corrupt people are themselves the stains, spoiling the fellowship they sit down to share. In both cases the force is moral: a blemish is something that has no business being there, that ruins what should be clean, and that must be washed away.

Because the word came from common life rather than from Israel's worship, the New Testament writers often set a stronger, ceremonial word for a sacrificial defect (μῶμος) right beside it (in Ephesians the bride is also called flawless, and in Second Peter the same people are called both spots and defects). The everyday image lets an ordinary reader feel the corruption on their own skin and clothing, while the paired ceremonial word supplies the weight of what it means to be unfit to stand before God.

Nuances

1aa moral blemish on someone otherwise clean: the mark a spotless bride does not have
Eph 5:27
1ba person who is himself a stain: corrupt people who spoil the fellowship they join
2Pe 2:13

What scholars say about spilos

The lexica treat σπίλος (masculine, short iota) as ordinary Hellenistic Greek for a physical spot or stain, well attested on skin (Dioscorides, Lucian Amores 15, Artemidorus), in blood (Josephus Ant. 13.11.3), and on the moon (Plutarch, De facie 921f), with a natural extension to a moral fault in persons (Dionysius of Halicarnassus 4.24). LSJ separates it as σπίλος (B) from the unrelated homonym σπίλος (A) / σπιλάς "rock, reef"; Frisk (GEW 2:767-68) and Beekes (2010) agree the two are etymologically distinct, the "stain" root being unexplained. The Atticist Phrynichus (Ecloga 21) rejected σπίλος as un-Attic in favor of κηλίς, but Lobeck (ad Phrynichum, 28) documents that it became the standard Koine literary word. BDAG glosses "spot, stain, blemish"; Louw-Nida splits the literal sense (Domain 79 K) from the moral sense (Domain 88). TDNT has no dedicated article, treating the family only under μῶμος/ἄμωμος. Spicq (TLNT 3, s.v.) gathers the literary and papyrological evidence and stresses that σπίλος + μῶμος in 2 Peter 2:13 plays on Deuteronomic sacrificial vocabulary. The word is absent from the LXX (the verb σπιλόω appears only at Wisdom 15:4, non-cultically), so the New Testament writers draw it from common life, not from Greek Scripture, and add ἄμωμος or μῶμος when a Levitical resonance is wanted. On Ephesians 5:27, Lincoln (WBC 42, 375-79), Thielman (BECNT, 386), Best (ICC, 546-49), and Hoehner (Baker, 750-63) read "spot or wrinkle" as bridal skin-imagery drawing on Ezekiel 16:8-14 and Song of Songs 4:7 LXX (Sampley, SNTSMS 16, 1971), with the cultic register supplied by ἄμωμος at the sentence's close; ῥυτίς "wrinkle" has no LXX cultic pedigree, anchoring the pair in the bridal frame. On 2 Peter 2:13, the near-consensus (Fornberg, ConBNT 9, 1977; Bauckham, WBC 50, 265-66; Neyrey, AB 37C; Davids, Pillar; G. Green, BECNT; Moo) is that 2 Peter depends on Jude and has deliberately replaced Jude's rare σπιλάδες with the familiar σπίλοι, pairing it with μῶμοι to activate the Levitical vocabulary and ironically invert the ἄμωμος καὶ ἄσπιλος lamb of 1 Peter 1:19.

In-depth research

This is a research paper, so it may be hard to read without scholarly background. It is useful if you want to dig even deeper into this word.

Sources

  • BDAG, s.v. σπίλοςlexicon
  • LSJ, s.v. σπίλοςlexicon
  • H. Frisk, Griechisches etymologisches Wörterbuch 2:767-68lexicon
  • R. Beekes, Etymological Dictionary of Greek (2010), s.v. σπίλοςlexicon
  • J. P. Louw & E. A. Nida, Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament Based on Semantic Domains, Domains 79, 88lexicon
  • C. Spicq, Theological Lexicon of the New Testament, vol. 3, s.v. σπίλοςdictionary
  • A. T. Lincoln, Ephesians (WBC 42, 1990), 375-79commentary
  • F. Thielman, Ephesians (BECNT, 2010), 386commentary
  • R. J. Bauckham, Jude, 2 Peter (WBC 50, 1983), 85-86, 265-66commentary
  • T. Fornberg, An Early Church in a Pluralistic Society (ConBNT 9, 1977), 33-59monograph
  • J. N. D. Kelly, A Commentary on the Epistles of Peter and of Jude (Black's, 1969), 269-70commentary

All attested forms of σπίλος

accusative m s

σπίλον

Eph 5:27

nominative m p

σπίλοι

2Pe 2:13