StrongerBible

skotia

σκοτία

GreekG4653darkness

Appears 16 times · tap a cell to see the verses

Mat 10:27Luk 12:3Jhn 1:5 (2×)Jhn 6:17Jhn 8:12Jhn 12:35 (2×)Jhn 12:46Jhn 20:11Jn 1:51Jn 2:81Jn 2:91Jn 2:11 (3×)
Root family
Word studyResearch-gradesko-TEE-ahnoun

What skotia means

darkness: the absence of light, used both for literal nighttime gloom and, in John's writings above all, for the realm of evil, ignorance, and hostility to God that the coming of Christ is driving out.

TranslatabilityApproximateCertaintyStrong

On its surface this is an ordinary word for darkness, the plain fact of no light. The Gospels can use it that way, for the dark of a night crossing or the early dark before dawn, and it carries the everyday idea of doing something out of sight, in the dark, as opposed to out in the open.

What makes the word remarkable is the weight John gives it. He sets it against the word for light and turns it into the name for a whole condition: the world as it is before and apart from God, where people do not know him, do evil, and resist the truth when it arrives. This is not darkness as a thing equal and opposite to God. In John's telling it is something made, something that fails to master the light shining in it, and something already on its way out now that Christ has come.

The same word does slightly different work in John's letters. There the cosmic picture narrows to a test of how a person lives: to walk in darkness is to keep sinning and, above all, to hate fellow believers, while those who love walk in the light. The not-knowing that the Gospel stresses becomes, in the letters, mostly a result of the hatred rather than the heart of the problem.

Underneath all of this the word means one thing, darkness, and the differences are shades drawn out by the setting: the literal dark of a verse about the time of day, the secrecy of something done in the dark, and the moral and spiritual dark that the rest of John's writing fills with meaning.

Nuances

1aliteral darkness: the absence of daylight, the dark of night or before dawn.
TranslatabilityDirect
Jhn 6:17Jhn 20:1
1bhiddenness or secrecy: what is said or done in the dark, out of sight, as opposed to out in the open.
Mat 10:27Luk 12:3
1cmoral and spiritual darkness: the realm of evil, ignorance, and hostility to God, opposed to light; in John's letters, narrowed to a life of sin and the hatred of fellow believers.
Jhn 1:5 (2×)Jhn 8:12Jhn 12:35 (2×)Jhn 12:461Jn 1:51Jn 2:81Jn 2:91Jn 2:11 (3×)

What scholars say about skotia

The major lexicons (BDAG, EDNT, Louw-Nida) and Conzelmann's TDNT article agree on a stable three-part range for skotia in the NT: literal darkness or absence of daylight (John 6:17; 20:1); hiddenness or secrecy, set against doing a thing in the open (Matt 10:27; Luke 12:3); and figurative spiritual or moral darkness, which dominates the Johannine corpus. Conzelmann denies any real semantic difference between skotia (the late, non-Attic feminine form, flagged as such by the Atticist grammarians Moeris and Thomas Magister) and the older neuter skotos, treating John's preference as stylistic; BDAG, EDNT, and Louw-Nida concur, against the popular claim that skotia is the more "abstract/moral" term. In the Septuagint skotos is the usual rendering of Hebrew choshek and related words, with skotia rare (e.g., Mic 3:6; Job 28:3); the Johannine background is set by Gen 1:2-5, the plague of darkness (Exod 10:21-22), and the Isaianic light-to-the-nations oracles (Isa 9:1; 42:6; 60:1-3). Johannine commentators (Brown, Schnackenburg, Michaels, Keener, Thompson, Carson, Kostenberger) read skotia in the Gospel as the cosmic-moral sphere of estrangement from God (ignorance, evil, hostility), created and already-defeated rather than a metaphysical equal of light; Michaels' formulation that it denotes the hostile "environment" or sphere rather than a group of people is widely cited. In 1 John the consensus (Brown, Marshall, Smalley, Kruse, Yarbrough, Jobes, Lieu, Painter) is that the term is primarily moral and relational (hating the brother), with cognitive blindness as a consequence; 1 John 2:8's present-tense "is passing away" is read as inaugurated eschatology.

Where scholars disagree about skotia

Whether skotia differs in meaning from its older twin skotos, or whether John's preference for it is only a matter of style.

  • majorityThere is no real difference; the two words are interchangeable and John's choice of skotia is stylistic. This is the verdict of the standard scholarly lexicons.; H. Conzelmann, TDNT VII (1971), 423-445; BDAG, 3rd ed. (2000), s.vv. σκοτία, σκότος; Louw-Nida, 2nd ed. (1989), s.vv.
  • minorityskotia is the more abstract or moral term and skotos the more concrete or physical one.; Popular Strong's-derivative lexicons (as characterized and rejected by Conzelmann, TDNT VII)
In-depth research

This is a research paper, so it may be hard to read without scholarly background. It is useful if you want to dig even deeper into this word.

Sources

  • H. Conzelmann, "σκότος, σκοτία, σκοτόω κτλ.," in Theological Dictionary of the New Testament (TDNT) VII (1971), 423-445dictionary
  • BDAG (Bauer-Danker-Arndt-Gingrich), A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament, 3rd ed. (2000), s.vv. σκοτία, σκότοςlexicon
  • Louw-Nida, Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament Based on Semantic Domains, 2nd ed. (1989), domains 14.53; 23.180; 28.71; 88.121lexicon
  • H. Balz and G. Schneider, eds., Exegetical Dictionary of the New Testament (EDNT) 3 (1990-93), s.vv. σκοτία, σκότοςdictionary
  • Raymond E. Brown, The Gospel According to John I-XII, Anchor Bible 29 (1966), 8-12, 26-27commentary
  • Raymond E. Brown, The Epistles of John, Anchor Bible 30 (1982), 230-266commentary
  • Rudolf Schnackenburg, The Gospel According to St John, ET vol. 1 (1968), 245, 271commentary
  • J. Ramsey Michaels, The Gospel of John, NICNT (2010), 53-54commentary
  • Craig S. Keener, The Gospel of John: A Commentary, 2 vols. (2003)commentary
  • D.A. Carson, The Gospel According to John, PNTC (1991), 119commentary
  • Andreas Kostenberger, A Theology of John's Gospel and Letters (2009), 277monograph
  • Colin G. Kruse, The Letters of John, PNTC (2000), 69-72commentary
  • Richard Bauckham, "Qumran and the Fourth Gospel: Is There a Connection?" in The Scrolls and the Scriptures, JSPSup 26 (1997), 267-279article

All attested forms of σκοτία

dative f s

σκοτίᾳ

Mat 10:27, Luk 12:3, Jhn 1:5, Jhn 8:12, Jhn 12:35, Jhn 12:46, 1Jn 2:9, 1Jn 2:11

nominative f s

σκοτία

Jhn 1:5, Jhn 6:17, Jhn 12:35, 1Jn 1:5, 1Jn 2:8, 1Jn 2:11

genitive f s

σκοτίας

Jhn 20:1