StrongerBible

Petros

Πέτρος

GreekG4074Proper NounPeter

Appears 159 times · tap a cell to see the verses

Mat 4:18Mat 8:14Mat 10:2Mat 14:28Mat 14:29Mat 15:15Mat 16:16Mat 16:18Mat 16:22Mat 16:23Mat 17:1Mat 17:4Mat 17:24Mat 17:26Mat 18:21Mat 19:27Mat 26:33Mat 26:37Mat 26:40Mat 26:73Mrk 3:16Mrk 5:37Mrk 8:33Mrk 9:2Mrk 14:33Mrk 14:37Mrk 14:66Mrk 14:67Mrk 14:70Mrk 16:7Mrk 16:8Luk 6:14Luk 8:51Luk 9:28Luk 22:34Luk 22:61Jhn 1:40Jhn 1:44Jhn 6:8Jhn 18:11Jhn 18:17Jhn 20:4Jhn 21:7Act 4:13Act 5:15Act 10:13Act 10:19Act 10:44Act 11:7Act 12:7
Root family
Word studyPEH-trossnoun

What Petros means

Peter: the added name, meaning "a stone," that Jesus gave the fisherman Simon, who became the leading apostle

TranslatabilityApproximateCertaintyStrong

Before it was anyone's name, this was an ordinary Greek word for a stone or a lump of rock. Greek speakers did not use it as a personal name, and no clear case of a man called by it turns up before this one. So when the Gospels attach it to Simon, the word has not gone quiet: it still sounds like a description, something close to calling a man "Rock."

The name arrives in the story as a gift rather than an inheritance. At their first meeting Jesus tells Simon he will be called Cephas (Κηφᾶς), the Aramaic word for a rock, "which is translated" by this Greek name (John 1:42). Mark and Luke record the giving plainly, inside the list of the twelve. Matthew puts it at the high point of the confession near Caesarea Philippi, where the new name and the promise about building are spoken in one breath. After that the writers mostly just use it, the way any name is used, and his birth name (Σίμων) often stands beside it.

Matthew 16:18 sets the new name next to the ordinary word for bedrock (πέτρα) in the same sentence, and a long argument has grown up over the switch. Older writers made much of it, treating the name as a small loose stone and the other word as a cliff. Most lexicographers now read the change as a matter of grammar and naming rather than size: a man's name wanted the masculine form, and the Aramaic sentence behind it would have used one word twice.

Paul is the odd one out. In his letters he nearly always calls the man by the Aramaic form, keeping the Greek name for one short stretch of Galatians, which is why the same apostle can look like two people to an English reader moving between the Gospels and the letters.

Nuances

1athe personal name of Simon the fisherman, used simply as the name he goes by
TranslatabilityDirect
Mat 8:14Mat 14:28Mat 14:29Mat 15:15Mat 16:16Mat 16:22Mat 16:23Mat 17:1Mat 17:4Mat 17:24Mat 17:26Mat 18:21
1bthe name at the moment it is given, where the giving of it is the point
TranslatabilityPartial
Mat 16:18Mrk 3:16Luk 6:14Jhn 1:42
1cthe added name used as an identifying tag: "Simon who is called Peter"
Mat 4:18Mat 10:2Act 10:5Act 10:18Act 10:32Act 11:13

Disputed

Whether the name and the ordinary word for bedrock in Matthew 16:18 are meant to differ in force, or are simply the masculine and feminine forms of one rock word.

  • majorityEffectively one word. The masculine form appears because it is serving as a man's name, and the Aramaic behind the saying would have used a single word twice.; BDAG, s.v. Πέτρος; W. D. Davies and Dale C. Allison, A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Gospel according to Saint Matthew, vol. 2 (ICC; Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1991)
  • minorityA deliberate contrast. On this reading the name keeps the older poetic sense of a detached stone, set against a rock mass, so the two words are not interchangeable.; Richard Chenevix Trench, Synonyms of the New Testament (9th ed.; London: Macmillan, 1880)

What scholars say about Petros

The lexica treat Πέτρος as a single entry: the Greek equivalent of the Aramaic surname Kepha, applied in the New Testament exclusively to Simon bar Jonah. LSJ documents πέτρος as a common noun for a stone or boulder, chiefly in poetry, and BDAG notes that its use as a personal name is otherwise unattested before the New Testament, which is why the evangelists present it as a bestowed designation rather than an inherited name. Cullmann's TDNT article argues for the priority of the Aramaic form: John 1:42 explicitly glosses Κηφᾶς with Πέτρος, and Paul's predominant use of Κηφᾶς in 1 Corinthians and Galatians supports the Semitic original. The classical distinction between πέτρος (a detached stone) and πέτρα (living rock) is real in Attic poetry but is widely held to have flattened in Koine, so most recent commentators on Matthew 16:18 read the two forms as a gender-driven variation on one underlying rock word rather than a deliberate contrast of size. The identification of the Cephas of Galatians 2:11 with the Peter of Galatians 2:7 and 2:8 has been challenged (Ehrman) and defended (Allison); the defence is the majority position.

Sources

  • BDAG, s.v. Πέτροςlexicon
  • LSJ, s.v. πέτροςlexicon
  • Oscar Cullmann, Πέτρος, Κηφᾶς, TDNT 6:100-112dictionary
  • EDNT, s.v. Πέτροςdictionary
  • W. D. Davies and Dale C. Allison, A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Gospel according to Saint Matthew, vol. 2 (ICC; Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1991)commentary
  • Bart D. Ehrman, "Cephas and Peter," Journal of Biblical Literature 109 (1990): 463-474article
  • Dale C. Allison, "Peter and Cephas: One and the Same," Journal of Biblical Literature 111 (1992): 489-495article

All attested forms of Πέτρος

nominative m s

Πέτρος

Mat 10:2, Mat 14:28, Mat 14:29, Mat 15:15, Mat 16:16, Mat 16:18, Mat 16:22, Mat 17:4

accusative m s

Πέτρον

Mat 4:18, Mat 17:1, Mat 26:37, Mrk 3:16, Mrk 5:37, Mrk 9:2, Mrk 14:33, Mrk 14:67

dative m s

Πέτρῳ

Mat 16:23, Mat 17:24, Mat 26:40, Mat 26:73, Mrk 8:33, Mrk 14:37, Mrk 14:70, Mrk 16:7

genitive m s

Πέτρου

Mat 8:14, Mrk 14:66, Jhn 1:40, Jhn 1:44, Jhn 6:8, Jhn 20:4, Act 4:13, Act 5:15

vocative m s

Πέτρε

Luk 22:34, Act 10:13, Act 11:7