a wrongdoing: a concrete act in which someone falls away from what is right and breaks faith with God or neighbor
Outside the Bible this word started out mild. It meant a slip, a blunder, a miscalculation: a general's bad strategy, a clerk's error in the tax accounts, a flaw in a piece of writing. The picture inside the word is of stumbling or falling off to the side of the path you were meant to walk. But by the time the New Testament writers use it, that picture is only faint background. The Greek translators of the Old Testament had already loaded the word with full moral weight, using it to render some of Hebrew's strongest terms for deliberate, faithless rebellion against God. So in the New Testament it is not a softer word for sin. It carries the same force as the ordinary words for sin and transgression.
At its heart it always names a definite act. It is sin pictured as a specific thing a person did, a particular false step taken, rather than sin pictured as a power or a condition. That is why it so often appears in the plural, counting up the individual wrongs that have to be forgiven, and why Paul can speak of one single such act, the one Adam committed, as the doorway through which sin entered the world.
The senses below are not different meanings. They are the same act of wrongdoing seen in two settings: the wrong done against God that needs his pardon, and the wrong done against another person that we are told to forgive as we have been forgiven. The fall imagery survives only as a turn of phrase a writer can play on, never as a way of making the offense sound small.
Nuances
Disputed
Whether Paul, especially in Romans 5, deliberately uses this word for the discrete act of sin in contrast to the word for sin as a power.
- majorityMost modern commentators hold that in Romans 5 Paul exploits a working contrast: this word names the concrete deed of sin (Adam's actual transgression and the many sins of humanity), while the ordinary word for sin names the personified power of evil that the deed unleashed.; C. E. B. Cranfield, The Epistle to the Romans (ICC), 1:283-296; J. A. Fitzmyer, Romans (AB 33), 417; D. J. Moo, The Epistle to the Romans (NICNT, 1996), 334-346
- minorityErnst Kasemann argues the word in this passage cannot be reduced to discrete individual acts: it carries a cosmic, almost mythic weight as the world-determining deed, functioning as a parallel to the word for sin rather than its opposite.; E. Kasemann, Commentary on Romans, ET G. W. Bromiley, 142-158