StrongerBible

orgē

ὀργή

GreekG3709wrath, anger, ...

Appears 36 times · tap a cell to see the verses

Mat 3:7Mrk 3:5Luk 3:7Luk 21:23Jhn 3:36Rom 1:18Rom 2:5 (2×)Rom 2:8Rom 3:5Rom 4:15Rom 5:9Rom 9:22 (2×)Rom 12:19Rom 13:4Rom 13:5Eph 2:3Eph 4:31Eph 5:6Col 3:6Col 3:81Th 1:101Th 2:161Th 5:91Ti 2:8Heb 3:11Heb 4:3Jas 1:19Jas 1:20Rev 6:16Rev 6:17Rev 11:18Rev 14:10
Root family
Word studyResearch-gradeor-GAYnoun

What orgē means

1

the wrath of God: his settled, personal opposition to evil and the judgment it brings

TranslatabilityApproximateCertaintyStrong

This is by far the most common use of the word in the New Testament, and it names something very specific. God's wrath here is not a sudden loss of temper or a fitful mood. It is a steady, deliberate, personal hostility toward everything that ruins his good world, and it is inseparable from his love: a God who did not oppose cruelty and evil would not be good. The word had traveled a long way to get here. In older Greek it meant a person's natural temperament, and the philosophers who followed treated anger as a fault to be moderated or erased. The translators of the Greek Old Testament then made it the standard word for the God who is slow to anger yet finally pours out judgment, and Paul inherited it in that form.

The senses below sort out the two things this one word can point to. Most often it names the reality itself, God's response to sin, whether that response is breaking in now or waiting for the last day. But the word also slides toward the judgment that the anger produces, so that the wrath can be spoken of as something poured out, treasured up, or escaped, almost as a thing with a location and a date.

A striking feature of the New Testament is that salvation is repeatedly described as rescue from this wrath. Paul says believers are saved from it through Christ, and that God did not appoint his people for wrath but for deliverance. That is why the word matters so much: what the gospel saves people from is defined, in part, by this term.

Nuances

1aGod's opposition to evil already at work in the present, revealed as he gives sinners over to the ruin they have chosen
Jhn 3:36Rom 1:18Rom 3:5Rom 4:15Eph 2:3Eph 5:6Col 3:6
1bthe wrath still to come: God's judgment reserved for the last day, from which Christ rescues his people
Mat 3:7Luk 3:7Luk 21:23Rom 2:5 (2×)Rom 2:8Rom 5:91Th 1:101Th 2:161Th 5:9Heb 3:11Heb 4:3Rev 6:16
1cwrath as the judgment itself, spoken of as something poured out, stored up, or handed over
Rom 9:22 (2×)Rom 12:19Rom 13:4Rom 13:5Rev 14:10Rev 16:19Rev 19:15

Disputed

Whether God's wrath in the New Testament is genuinely personal (his own settled response to evil) or an impersonal process by which sin brings its own ruin.

  • majorityIt is genuinely personal: God's own holy opposition to evil, though it often works through the ordinary course of history rather than by direct intervention.; Leon Morris, The Apostolic Preaching of the Cross, 3rd ed. (Tyndale, 1965); C. E. B. Cranfield, The Epistle to the Romans, ICC (T&T Clark, 1975); D. A. Carson, The Wrath of God, in Engaging the Doctrine of God, ed. B. L. McCormack (Baker, 2008)
  • minorityIt is an impersonal working-out of cause and effect in a moral universe; Paul kept the phrase but emptied it of God's personal anger.; C. H. Dodd, The Epistle of Paul to the Romans, MNTC (Hodder & Stoughton, 1932); A. T. Hanson, The Wrath of the Lamb (SPCK, 1957)
2

human anger: strong hostility in people, usually named as a fault to be put away

TranslatabilityApproximateCertaintySettled

When the New Testament turns the same word on people rather than on God, the verdict is almost always negative. Human anger belongs in lists of things believers are told to strip off, alongside malice and slander. James puts it most sharply: a person's anger does not produce the kind of life God calls for, so one should be slow to reach for it. The point is not that all strong feeling is wrong, but that human anger tends to run past justice into self-will, which is exactly why it is fitting in God and dangerous in us.

There is one telling exception. The Gospel of Mark reports that Jesus looked around in anger at people whose hearts were hard, and it pairs that anger with grief. This is not spite or wounded pride but moral indignation joined to sorrow, and it leads straight into an act of healing. It is the rare case where this word describes anger in a human being that is right rather than sinful, and it stands close to God's own wrath in kind.

Nuances

2asinful human anger, listed among the attitudes believers must put away
Eph 4:31Col 3:81Ti 2:8Jas 1:19Jas 1:20
2brighteous indignation in a person: anger at evil joined to grief, not sinful
Mrk 3:5

What scholars say about orgē

The dominant NT sense is divine wrath, and the standard scholarly treatment (Stählin, TDNT V.382-447) traces its path from a classical anthropological term (Aristotle's reasoned desire for due retribution, Rhet. II.2) through the LXX, where it becomes overwhelmingly God's, most often rendering Hebrew 'aph, and shifts toward the concrete manifestation of judgment (the cup, the day, the vessels). The twentieth-century debate turns on C. H. Dodd's 1932 thesis that Paul's orge is an impersonal process of cause and effect, not God's personal attitude; Leon Morris, Roger Nicole, Cranfield, Kasemann, Moo, Schreiner, and Carson answer that the OT evidence, Paul's active language (the threefold "God gave them up" in Rom 1:24-28; "the one who inflicts wrath" in 3:5), and the settled sense of the word all favor a personal reading, while conceding Dodd's insight that the wrath normally operates through historical process. Mediating voices (Lane, Travis, MacGregor) hold that NT wrath is personal but somewhat less personally portrayed than in the OT and is an aspect of God's love. Lexica (BDAG; Louw-Nida, domains 38 and 88) register the slide from emotion to enacted retribution. The classical distinction from thumos (sudden vs. settled) is historically real but, as Stählin cautions and Barr and Carson warn, should not be pressed in NT exegesis; it remains statistically visible in that Paul favors orge for divine wrath while Revelation attracts thumos and combines both.

In-depth research

This is a research paper, so it may be hard to read without scholarly background. It is useful if you want to dig even deeper into this word.

Sources

  • G. Stählin, "ὀργή," Theological Dictionary of the New Testament, vol. V, pp. 382-447lexicon
  • BDAG, A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament, 3rd ed. (2000), s.v. ὀργήlexicon
  • Leon Morris, The Apostolic Preaching of the Cross, 3rd ed. (Tyndale, 1965)monograph
  • C. H. Dodd, The Epistle of Paul to the Romans, MNTC (Hodder & Stoughton, 1932)commentary
  • A. T. Hanson, The Wrath of the Lamb (SPCK, 1957)monograph
  • C. E. B. Cranfield, The Epistle to the Romans, ICC (T&T Clark, 1975)commentary
  • D. J. Moo, The Epistle to the Romans, NICNT (Eerdmans, 1996)commentary
  • T. R. Schreiner, Romans, BECNT (Baker, 1998)commentary
  • A. N. S. Lane, "The Wrath of God as an Aspect of the Love of God," in Nothing Greater, Nothing Better, ed. K. J. Vanhoozer (Eerdmans, 2001)monograph
  • D. A. Carson, The Gospel According to John, PNTC (Eerdmans, 1991)commentary

All attested forms of ὀργή

genitive f s

ὀργῆς

Mat 3:7, Mrk 3:5, Luk 3:7, Rom 2:5, Rom 5:9, Rom 9:22, Eph 2:3, 1Th 1:10

nominative f s

ὀργὴ, ὀργή

Luk 21:23, Jhn 3:36, Rom 1:18, Rom 2:8, Eph 4:31, Eph 5:6, Col 3:6, 1Th 2:16

accusative f s

ὀργὴν, ὀργήν

Rom 2:5, Rom 4:15, Rom 9:22, Rom 13:4, Rom 13:5, 1Th 5:9, Rom 3:5, Col 3:8

dative f s

ὀργῇ

Rom 12:19, Heb 3:11, Heb 4:3