StrongerBible

hothen

ὅθεν

GreekG3606therefore, whence, ...

Appears 15 times · tap a cell to see the verses

Mat 12:44Mat 14:7Mat 25:24Mat 25:26Luk 11:24Act 14:26Act 26:19Act 28:13Heb 2:17Heb 3:1Heb 7:25Heb 8:3Heb 9:18Heb 11:191Jn 2:18
Root family
Word studyResearch-gradeHO-thenconjunction

What hothen means

1

from which place: a word pointing back to a physical starting point that something has left or come from

TranslatabilityApproximateCertaintySettled

In its most concrete use ὅθεν marks the place of origin from which someone or something moves or is taken. The unclean spirit returns to the house from which it came (Matt 12:44; Luke 11:24); Paul's company sails from a port (Acts 28:13); the disciples return to the church from which they had been sent out (Acts 14:26). The word combines the ordinary "which" with an ending that means "away from a place" (the same ending behind the Greek word for "from there"), so its sense of motion out of a place is built right in.

In Matthew 25:24 and 25:26 the parable of the talents stretches the word a little: it stands in for the fuller phrase "from the place where," a compressed way of speaking that was already common in older Greek. The sense of a place something is gathered from is perfectly clear even when the wording is tightened up.

Nuances

1afrom which place, from where (motion or origin)
Mat 12:44Luk 11:24Act 14:26Act 28:13
1bfrom which place (a compressed phrasing: from where, gathering from a source)
Mat 25:24Mat 25:26
2

for which reason, therefore: a word that draws a conclusion from something already said

TranslatabilityPartialCertaintyStrong

Used this way, ὅθεν is not a vague "therefore." It points back to a particular statement just made and draws the conclusion that necessarily follows from it. The idea of a physical source ("from which place") slides into the idea of a starting point for thought ("from which fact, from which premise"). The oldest Greek already used the word this way, but it became common in the more polished, literary Greek of writers like Philo, the books of Maccabees, formal petitions to officials, and most strikingly the letter to the Hebrews.

Six of the word's fifteen New Testament appearances are in Hebrews, every one of them drawing a conclusion, and often paired with words of obligation or necessity (he was obligated in 2:17; it is necessary in 8:3; he is able in 7:25). It is not just a plain "therefore" but a refined way of marking a consequence drawn from something already established. At Hebrews 3:1 the word marks a major turning point in the letter, swinging from teaching about Christ into sustained pastoral encouragement. The writer of Hebrews leans on ὅθεν heavily (Paul never uses it at all), one of the reasons scholars think Hebrews was written by someone at home in elevated, literary Greek rather than by Paul.

The three conclusion-drawing uses outside Hebrews appear in Matthew's narrative (14:7, Herod's oath and what it led to) and in Paul's formal courtroom speech before Agrippa (Acts 26:19), which one scholar said "gathers up all that Paul has said," again a polished setting that calls for ὅθεν. 1 John 2:18 is the one verse where the "from which premise" sense shades into "from which evidence" (the departure of the antichrists is the ground for knowing it is the last hour), and readers have long kept both shades in view rather than flattening it into a bare conclusion.

Nuances

2atherefore, for which reason (drawing a conclusion from something already said)
Mat 14:7Act 26:19Heb 2:17Heb 3:1Heb 7:25Heb 8:3Heb 9:18Heb 11:19
2bfrom which evidence, by which we know (drawing a conclusion from what can be seen)
1Jn 2:18

What scholars say about hothen

Every major lexicon agrees on a binary split: spatial (from which place) and inferential (for which reason). BDAG (p. 693) states this most cleanly; LSJ traces both senses from Homer and classical Attic; Louw-Nida assigns two domain numbers (84.11 spatial; 89.25 causal/inferential). The concentration of inferential ὅθεν in Hebrews (six of fifteen NT occurrences, all inferential, often pairing with verbs of necessity) is one of the well-established arguments against Pauline authorship (Paul never uses the word) and for locating the author in literary Hellenistic Jewish Greek. George Guthrie's text-linguistic analysis of Hebrews and Derrick Hildebrant's conjunction-driven analysis both show ὅθεν functioning as a structural hinge in the epistle, most conspicuously at 3:1. The one live exegetical debate concerns Hebrews 11:19, where a small minority allows a locative reading alongside the majority inferential one. 1 John 2:18 is the second edge case, where the word shades from inference into epistemic-source; Westcott and Abbott-Smith resist flattening it into the inferential pile. Steven Runge and Stephen Levinsohn's discourse-grammar frameworks clarify the register difference between ὅθεν, διό, and οὖν: each imposes distinct constraints, and ὅθεν's literary elevation (well-attested in Philo, 2-4 Maccabees, and formal petitions) explains its concentration in Hebrews and its absence from Paul.

Where scholars disagree about hothen

Whether Hebrews 11:19 is inferential ("therefore he received him back, as a type of resurrection") or spatial/locative ("from which [death] he received him back").

  • majorityInferential: Abraham received Isaac back from death figuratively, as a type or symbol of resurrection; ὅθεν draws the typological conclusion from Abraham's faith that God could raise the dead.; Attridge, Hebrews, Hermeneia (Fortress, 1989); Lane, Hebrews, WBC 47A-B (Word, 1991); Koester, Hebrews, AYB 36 (Yale, 2001); Cockerill, Hebrews, NICNT (Eerdmans, 2012); Bruce, Hebrews, NICNT rev. ed. (Eerdmans, 1990)
  • minorityLocative: ὅθεν refers back to ἐκ νεκρῶν ("from which death" he received him back), reading the word spatially rather than inferentially.; Ellingworth, Hebrews, NIGTC (Eerdmans, 1993)
In-depth research

This is a research paper, so it may be hard to read without scholarly background. It is useful if you want to dig even deeper into this word.

Sources

  • BDAG, s.v. ὅθεν, p. 693lexicon
  • LSJ, s.v. ὅθενlexicon
  • Louw-Nida, domains 84.11 and 89.25lexicon
  • Thayer, s.v. ὅθενlexicon
  • Abbott-Smith, s.v. ὅθενlexicon
  • Moulton-Milligan, Vocabulary of the Greek Testament, s.v. ὅθενlexicon
  • Spicq, Theological Lexicon of the New Testament, s.v. ὅθεν (ET Hendrickson, 1994)lexicon
  • B. F. Westcott, The Epistle to the Hebrews (Macmillan, 1903)commentary
  • F. F. Bruce, The Epistle to the Hebrews, NICNT rev. ed. (Eerdmans, 1990)commentary
  • Harold W. Attridge, Hebrews, Hermeneia (Fortress, 1989), pp. 95-96commentary
  • Paul Ellingworth, The Epistle to the Hebrews, NIGTC (Eerdmans, 1993)commentary
  • William L. Lane, Hebrews, WBC 47A-B (Word, 1991)commentary
  • Craig R. Koester, Hebrews, AYB 36 (Yale, 2001)commentary
  • Gareth Lee Cockerill, The Epistle to the Hebrews, NICNT (Eerdmans, 2012)commentary
  • George H. Guthrie, The Structure of Hebrews: A Text-Linguistic Analysis, NovTSup 73 (Brill, 1994)monograph
  • Cynthia Long Westfall, A Discourse Analysis of the Letter to the Hebrews, LNTS 297 (T&T Clark, 2005)monograph
  • Steven E. Runge, Discourse Grammar of the Greek New Testament (Lexham, 2010)monograph
  • Stephen H. Levinsohn, Discourse Features of New Testament Greek, 2nd ed. (SIL, 2000)monograph
  • Daniel B. Wallace, Greek Grammar Beyond the Basics (Zondervan, 1996), p. 673monograph
  • Raymond E. Brown, The Epistles of John, AB 30 (Doubleday, 1982), pp. 330-32commentary
  • C. K. Barrett, A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Acts of the Apostles, ICC (T&T Clark, 1994, 1998)commentary
  • W. D. Davies and Dale C. Allison, A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Gospel According to Saint Matthew, ICC, vol. 2 (T&T Clark, 1991)commentary
  • Ronald Williamson, Philo and the Epistle to the Hebrews (Brill, 1970)monograph

All attested forms of ὅθεν

conj

ὅθεν, Ὅθεν

Mat 14:7, Mat 25:24, Mat 25:26, Heb 2:17, Heb 7:25, Heb 8:3, Heb 9:18, 1Jn 2:18

prep

ὅθεν

Mat 12:44, Luk 11:24, Act 14:26, Act 28:13, Heb 11:19