StrongerBible

hermēneia

ἑρμηνεία

GreekG2058interpretation

Appears 2 times · tap a cell to see the verses

1Co 12:101Co 14:26
Word studyResearch-gradeher-may-NEE-ahnoun

What hermēneia means

interpretation: putting an unintelligible utterance into speech the gathered church can understand

TranslatabilityApproximateCertaintyContested

Both times this noun appears in the New Testament, it names a gift Paul lists for worship in Corinth: the interpretation that pairs with speaking in tongues. When someone speaks in a tongue, no one in the room understands it; the gift of interpretation is what makes that utterance intelligible and useful to everyone present. Paul's whole concern in these chapters is that what happens in worship should build people up, and a tongue cannot do that until it is interpreted.

The word itself was broad in everyday Greek. It could mean translating one language into another, explaining something obscure, or simply putting a thought into clear words. Paul uses the noun only for this church setting, so the corpus gives us a single usage rather than a spread of distinct senses. The deeper question, which the word alone cannot answer, is exactly what is being made clear: an actual foreign language being rendered, or a Spirit-prompted utterance being given understandable form. That question is genuinely debated and is recorded in the dispute below.

Whatever the precise mechanics, the point Paul presses is constant: interpretation exists so that the rest of the congregation can share in what was said and be strengthened by it.

1Co 12:101Co 14:26

What scholars say about hermēneia

The ἑρμην- group covers four overlapping jobs in ancient Greek: translating between languages, expounding the obscure, articulating inner thought into speech, and mediating between divine and human parties (the cultural, though etymologically false, tie to Hermes). Chantraine, Frisk, and Beekes classify ἑρμηνεύς as a Pre-Greek/Anatolian technical term (Beekes links it to Carian armon, ultimately Akkadian targumanu), rejecting the Hermes derivation as folk etymology; Janko (CQ 64.2 [2014]) defends an Indo-European etymology against this dominant view. LSJ, BDAG, Louw-Nida (domain 33), and Behm's TDNT article treat the senses as a continuum, and agree the prefixes in διερμηνεύω and μεθερμηνεύω are stylistic rather than lexical, with μεθερμηνεύω happening to be reserved in the NT for cross-language glossing. The noun ἑρμηνεία occurs only at 1 Corinthians 12:10 and 14:26, where its sense is contested. The translation reading (Gundry, JTS 17.2 [1966]; Forbes, WUNT 2.75 [1995]; Turner; Carson; Fitzmyer, AYB) takes γλῶσσαι as real languages, so ἑρμηνεία is rendering one language into another. The articulation reading, argued by Thiselton (JTS 30 [1979]; NIGTC 1 Corinthians) from Philo's and Josephus's use of the verb for putting inner thought into words, and joined in substance by Fee (NICNT), takes ἑρμηνεία as giving intelligible voice to a pre-articulate, Spirit-prompted utterance. The older ecstatic-speech reading (Conzelmann, Hermeneia) is now largely abandoned after Forbes. Most agree the lexical data alone cannot decide the question; it turns on what one judges the tongues themselves to be.

Where scholars disagree about hermēneia

What the noun means in its only two New Testament occurrences (1 Corinthians 12:10; 14:26): the translation of an actual language received without learning it, or the articulation into intelligible speech of a Spirit-prompted utterance that is not itself a known language. The answer depends on what one judges speaking in tongues to be, and the word itself cannot settle it.

  • contestedTranslation of a real language: speaking in tongues is a genuine human (or angelic) language, so interpretation is rendering it into the hearers' language.; Christopher Forbes, Prophecy and Inspired Speech, WUNT 2.75 (1995); Robert H. Gundry, JTS n.s. 17.2 (1966): 299-307; Max Turner, The Holy Spirit and Spiritual Gifts (Hendrickson, 1996)
  • contestedArticulation of inarticulate utterance: tongues are Spirit-prompted, language-like utterance that is not a known language, so interpretation gives it intelligible verbal form rather than translating it.; Anthony C. Thiselton, JTS n.s. 30 (1979): 15-36; NIGTC 1 Corinthians (2000); Gordon D. Fee, NICNT 1 Corinthians (rev. 2014)
  • minorityInspired clarification of ecstatic, unintelligible utterance; an older reading now largely abandoned after Forbes dismantled the Hellenistic ecstatic parallels.; Hans Conzelmann, 1 Corinthians, Hermeneia (ET 1975)
In-depth research

This is a research paper, so it may be hard to read without scholarly background. It is useful if you want to dig even deeper into this word.

Sources

  • Johannes Behm, "ἑρμηνεύω κτλ.," TDNT 2:661-66theological-dictionary
  • BDAG, s.v. ἑρμηνεία, ἑρμηνεύωlexicon
  • LSJ, s.v. ἑρμηνεία, ἑρμηνεύςlexicon
  • Louw-Nida, Greek-English Lexicon Based on Semantic Domains, domain 33lexicon
  • Moisés Silva, NIDNTTE, s.v. ἑρμηνεύωtheological-dictionary
  • Anthony C. Thiselton, "The 'Interpretation' of Tongues? A New Suggestion in the Light of Greek Usage in Philo and Josephus," JTS n.s. 30 (1979): 15-36article
  • Anthony C. Thiselton, The First Epistle to the Corinthians, NIGTC (Eerdmans, 2000)commentary
  • Christopher Forbes, Prophecy and Inspired Speech in Early Christianity and Its Hellenistic Environment, WUNT 2.75 (Mohr Siebeck, 1995)monograph
  • Robert H. Gundry, "'Ecstatic Utterance' (N.E.B.)?," JTS n.s. 17.2 (1966): 299-307article
  • Gordon D. Fee, The First Epistle to the Corinthians, NICNT (Eerdmans, rev. 2014)commentary
  • D. A. Carson, Showing the Spirit (Baker, 1987)monograph
  • Robert Beekes, Etymological Dictionary of Greek (Brill, 2010), s.v. ἑρμηνεύςlexicon

All attested forms of ἑρμηνεία

accusative f s

ἑρμηνείαν

1Co 14:26

nominative f s

ἑρμηνεία

1Co 12:10