StrongerBible

existēmi

ἐξίστημι

GreekG1839amazed, beside himself

Appears 17 times · tap a cell to see the verses

Mat 12:23Mrk 2:12Mrk 3:21Mrk 5:42Mrk 6:51Luk 2:47Luk 8:56Luk 24:22Act 2:7Act 2:12Act 8:9Act 8:11Act 8:13Act 9:21Act 10:45Act 12:162Co 5:13
Compound of
Root family
Word studyResearch-gradeex-ISS-tay-meeverb

What existēmi means

to be knocked out of your normal state of mind: overwhelmed with amazement, or, at the far edge, out of your senses.

TranslatabilityPartialCertaintyStrong

The word literally pictures standing outside your fixed place. In everyday Greek it covered a wide range, from stepping down out of an office to losing your wits. The Bible fastens on one edge of that range: the way a person is bowled over by something overwhelming. When crowds watch Jesus heal, drive out demons, or raise the dead, they are amazed in exactly this sense, knocked clean out of their composure.

Underneath the different English words lies one picture: being displaced from your normal footing. The same verb runs from the bright astonishment of a crowd at a miracle, through causing that astonishment in others, to the darker edge where a person seems to have left their right mind. That is why two short verses have drawn centuries of argument: when Jesus' family says he is beside himself, and when Paul says that if he was out of his mind, it was for God.

The amazement here is not casual surprise. In the Greek Old Testament this verb was chosen to translate a whole family of Hebrew words for trembling and dread before God, so it carries the weight of awe: the body's involuntary response when God breaks in. Keep that in mind, and the line between overwhelmed wonder and being knocked out of one's senses stops looking like two unrelated ideas and starts to look like one continuum.

Nuances

1ato be overwhelmed with amazement; to be astonished or awestruck at what one sees or hears.
Mat 12:23Mrk 2:12Mrk 5:42Mrk 6:51Luk 2:47Luk 8:56Act 2:7Act 2:12Act 8:13Act 9:21Act 10:45Act 12:16
1bto amaze or astound other people; to leave a crowd beside itself with wonder.
Luk 24:22Act 8:9Act 8:11
1cto be out of one's mind; to be beside oneself, whether through madness or through God-given overwhelming.
Mrk 3:212Co 5:13
Mrk 3:21

How to read the word in Mark 3:21, and who its subject is: whether Jesus is charged with being out of his mind, or the verse means something else.

  • majorityJesus' family come to seize him because they believe he is out of his mind; their charge is a milder version of the scribes' charge that he is possessed.; R. T. France, The Gospel of Mark, NIGTC (2002); Joel Marcus, Mark 1-8, Anchor Yale Bible (2000); Adela Yarbro Collins, Mark, Hermeneia (2007); Robert A. Guelich, Mark 1-8:26, WBC (1989)
  • minorityThe people around Jesus are his associates rather than his family, and the subject of the verb is the crowd, which is out of control, not Jesus.; Henry Wansbrough, "Mark III.21: Was Jesus Out of His Mind?," NTS 18 (1972)
  • minorityThe verb is causative here, "he has amazed them," so the verse belongs with the crowd's astonishment rather than with madness.; Drew J. Holland, "A Proposal for a New Reading of Mark 3:21," Journal of Inductive Biblical Studies 4 (2017)
2Co 5:13

What Paul means by saying that if he was beside himself, it was for God.

  • majorityPaul refers to his own genuine ecstatic experience, which is private and directed toward God, set against the sober public ministry he conducts for the church.; Ernst Kasemann, "Die Legitimitat des Apostels," ZNW 41 (1942); Margaret E. Thrall, 2 Corinthians, ICC (1994); Victor Paul Furnish, II Corinthians, Anchor Bible (1984)
  • minorityPaul echoes, and ironically concedes, an accusation of madness that has been leveled against him.; Alfred Plummer, Second Epistle of St Paul to the Corinthians, ICC (1915); David E. Garland, 2 Corinthians, NAC (1999); Albrecht Oepke, "existemi," in Theological Dictionary of the New Testament (TDNT) 2:449-460
  • minorityThe words are drawn from ordinary criticism of a public leader's manner and speech; Paul is answering the complaint that his speaking was unimpressive, not any charge about religious ecstasy.; Moyer V. Hubbard, "Was Paul Out of His Mind? Re-Reading 2 Corinthians 5.13," JSNT 70 (1998); C. Andrew Ballard, "Tongue-Tied and Taunted," JSNT 37 (2014)

What scholars say about existēmi

The lexica agree on a two-part structure governed by form. First-aorist and other active forms are transitive-causative (to displace, drive out of one's senses, astound another); second-aorist, perfect, and middle or passive forms are intransitive (to be displaced, astonished, or beside oneself), a rule formalized in BDF section 95 and stressed by Robertson and Wallace. BDAG organizes the entry as transitive (to confuse, amaze, astound, at Luke 24:22 and Acts 8:9, 11) and intransitive, the latter with two sub-senses: to be astonished (the majority of NT occurrences) and to be out of one's senses (assigned explicitly to Mark 3:21 and 2 Cor 5:13). Louw-Nida likewise split the verb between an astonishment domain and a "beside oneself" domain. The classical range (LSJ) is far wider, covering legal cession of office or property, degeneration of substances, and mental derangement, with astonishment only a marginal branch; Moulton-Milligan document both the legal and the psychological senses in the Koine papyri, defeating older claims of a Semitizing usage. As Oepke argues in TDNT (2:449-460), the Septuagint elevated the marginal "astonishment" branch to central position, using the verb to render a broad Hebrew field of numinous trembling and dread (chared, pachad, shamem, tamah), and pressing the noun ekstasis into service for a divinely imposed visionary trance at Genesis 2:21 and 15:12; Philo (Her. 249-266) systematized four kinds of ekstasis, giving the term a positive religious valence. Two NT occurrences remain sharply contested. On Mark 3:21 a strong majority (France, Marcus, Yarbro Collins, Guelich) reads Jesus' family charging him with derangement, a datum most historical-Jesus scholars judge early on the criterion of embarrassment; Wansbrough's crowd reading and Holland's causative reading have not carried the field. On 2 Cor 5:13 the ecstatic reading (Kasemann, Thrall, Furnish, Barrett) dominates but is now pressed by Hubbard and Ballard, who show that existemi and ekstasis nowhere in the LXX or NT denote ritual ecstasy and argue the language is that of Greco-Roman leadership criticism, and by the older opponents'-charge reading (Plummer, Garland, Oepke).

In-depth research

This is a research paper, so it may be hard to read without scholarly background. It is useful if you want to dig even deeper into this word.

Sources

  • Walter Bauer, A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament (BDAG), 3rd ed. (2000), s.v. existemilexicon
  • Henry George Liddell and Robert Scott, A Greek-English Lexicon (LSJ), 9th ed., s.v. existemilexicon
  • Johannes P. Louw and Eugene A. Nida, Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament Based on Semantic Domains (1988), 25.218; 30.24lexicon
  • Albrecht Oepke, "existemi," in Theological Dictionary of the New Testament (TDNT) 2:449-460dictionary
  • James Hope Moulton and George Milligan, The Vocabulary of the Greek Testament (1930), s.v. existemidictionary
  • F. Blass, A. Debrunner, and R. W. Funk, A Greek Grammar of the New Testament (BDF) section 95monograph
  • R. T. France, The Gospel of Mark, NIGTC (2002)commentary
  • Joel Marcus, Mark 1-8, Anchor Yale Bible (2000)commentary
  • Adela Yarbro Collins, Mark, Hermeneia (2007)commentary
  • Margaret E. Thrall, 2 Corinthians, ICC (1994)commentary
  • Murray J. Harris, The Second Epistle to the Corinthians, NIGTC (2005)commentary
  • David E. Garland, 2 Corinthians, NAC (1999)commentary
  • Ernst Kasemann, "Die Legitimitat des Apostels," ZNW 41 (1942)article
  • Moyer V. Hubbard, "Was Paul Out of His Mind? Re-Reading 2 Corinthians 5.13," JSNT 70 (1998)article
  • C. Andrew Ballard, "Tongue-Tied and Taunted," JSNT 37 (2014)article
  • Henry Wansbrough, "Mark III.21: Was Jesus Out of His Mind?," NTS 18 (1972)article
  • Philo of Alexandria, Quis Rerum Divinarum Heres Sit 249-266monograph

All attested forms of ἐξίστημι

imperfect middle indicative 3p

ἐξίσταντο

Mat 12:23, Mrk 6:51, Luk 2:47, Act 2:7, Act 2:12, Act 9:21

second-aorist active indicative 3p

ἐξέστησαν

Mrk 5:42, Luk 8:56, Luk 24:22, Act 10:45, Act 12:16

imperfect middle indicative 3s

ἐξίστατο

Act 8:13

perfect active infinitive

ἐξεστακέναι

Act 8:11

present active participle nominative m s

ἐξιστάνων

Act 8:9

present middle infinitive

ἐξίστασθαι

Mrk 2:12

second-aorist active indicative 1p

ἐξέστημεν

2Co 5:13

second-aorist active indicative 3s

ἐξέστη

Mrk 3:21