StrongerBible

ekplēssō

ἐκπλήσσω

GreekG1605amazed, astonished, ...

Appears 13 times · tap a cell to see the verses

Mat 7:28Mat 13:54Mat 19:25Mat 22:33Mrk 1:22Mrk 6:2Mrk 7:37Mrk 10:26Mrk 11:18Luk 2:48Luk 4:32Luk 9:43Act 13:12
Compound of
Word studyResearch-gradeek-PLACE-soverb

What ekplēssō means

to be overwhelmed with astonishment: knocked out of one's normal composure by something too big to take in

TranslatabilityPartialCertaintySettled

The picture behind this word is a physical blow. It is built from a verb meaning to strike or hit, so its oldest sense is to strike something clean out of a person. In the New Testament it always describes people on the receiving end: something outside them lands with such force that it drives them out of their ordinary calm. That makes it a strong word, well above the everyday word for marveling or wondering (θαυμάζω). It belongs near the top of the range of words for amazement, close to the idea of being beside oneself (ἐξίστημι).

Every one of its appearances describes bystanders reacting, and the thing that hits them is almost always Jesus: his teaching, the power in his miracles, or, in the one occurrence outside the Gospels, the message about him. Crowds, disciples, his own parents, and a Roman governor are all knocked back the same way. The word insists that the reaction was not chosen. These people did not decide to be amazed; something struck them.

The emotional color shifts from writer to writer.

  • In Luke the astonishment leans toward worship, as when a crowd is overwhelmed at the majesty of God.
  • In Mark it carries a note of unsettling, almost fearful shock.
  • In Matthew it can be a blow to the mind that curdles into offense, since the same neighbors who are stunned by Jesus then take offense at him.
  • In Acts it becomes the doorway to belief.

One important caution runs through all of this: being struck like this is not the same as faith. It can open into faith or it can stall short of it.

Mat 7:28Mat 13:54Mat 19:25Mat 22:33Mrk 1:22Mrk 6:2Mrk 7:37Mrk 10:26Mrk 11:18Luk 2:48Luk 4:32Luk 9:43

What scholars say about ekplēssō

The lexica agree on the core sense. BDAG (Danker, 3rd ed., 2000, 308) glosses the passive "be amazed, astounded, overwhelmed" and notes the etymology, "strike out of one's senses." Louw and Nida place ἐκπλήσσομαι high on the astonishment gradient (§25.219, "to be so amazed as to be practically overwhelmed"), above θαυμάζω and adjacent to ἐξίστημι and ἐκθαμβέω; the classical synonymist J. H. H. Schmidt (Synonymik der griechischen Sprache, vol. II §139) likewise groups it with words for a sudden, violent shock from an overwhelming external cause. Spicq (Theological Lexicon of the NT, 1994) describes a psycho-physical seizure by something too big for the mind, and Stählin (TDNT VI, on πλήσσω/ἐκπλήσσω) and Radl (EDNT I, 420) stress that in Koine it outweighs θαυμάζω while remaining religiously ambivalent, an involuntary shock that can open into faith or stall as unbelief. The verb is elevated and literary rather than vernacular: Moulton-Milligan find almost no documentary papyri, and the cognate noun ἔκπληξις became the rhetorical term (in On the Sublime) for the shattering effect of great writing. The one live disagreement is over how much of the etymological force the Evangelists still felt. France (Mark, NIGTC, 2002; Matthew, NICNT, 2007) and Davies-Allison (ICC, 1988-97) argue the verb had faded toward a stock formula, pointing to Mark's added intensifiers (περισσῶς, ὑπερπερισσῶς) and Matthew's substitution of it for ἐξεθαύμαζον at 22:33. Marcus (AYB, 2000-09), Hooker (BNTC, 1991), Yarbro Collins (Hermeneia, 2007), and Lane (NICNT, 1974) counter that the metaphor stayed live and the intensifiers are climactic rhetoric, not lexical propping. Guelich (WBC, 1989) and Fitzmyer (Luke, AB, 1981-85) take a middle line.

Where scholars disagree about ekplēssō

Whether the Evangelists still heard the verb's literal "struck out of one's senses" force, or whether it had faded into a conventional evaluative formula for strong amazement.

  • contestedThe verb had largely bleached into a stock formula for a powerful impression, which is why Mark reinforces it with intensifiers (περισσῶς, ὑπερπερισσῶς) and Matthew swaps it in for other amazement verbs.; France, R. T., The Gospel of Mark (NIGTC), Eerdmans, 2002; Davies, W. D., and Allison, D. C., Matthew (ICC), T&T Clark, 1988-97
  • contestedThe violent metaphor remained live; the intensifiers are climactic rhetoric straining language to its limit, not repairs to a worn-out word.; Marcus, J., Mark (Anchor Yale Bible), 2000-09; Hooker, M. D., Saint Mark (BNTC), 1991; Yarbro Collins, A., Mark (Hermeneia), Fortress, 2007
  • contestedA middle position: the verb had grown somewhat conventional in Koine, but the Evangelists could and did exploit its residual force for rhetorical climax.; Guelich, R. A., Mark 1-8:26 (WBC), 1989; Fitzmyer, J. A., Luke (Anchor Bible), 1981-85
In-depth research

This is a research paper, so it may be hard to read without scholarly background. It is useful if you want to dig even deeper into this word.

Sources

  • Danker, F. W., A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament (BDAG), 3rd ed., Chicago, 2000, s.v. ἐκπλήσσω, p. 308lexicon
  • Louw, J. P., and Nida, E. A., Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament Based on Semantic Domains, §25.219lexicon
  • Stählin, G., "πλήσσω, ἐκπλήσσω," in Theological Dictionary of the New Testament (TDNT), vol. VItheological-dictionary
  • Radl, W., "ἐκπλήσσομαι," in Exegetical Dictionary of the New Testament (EDNT), vol. 1, p. 420theological-dictionary
  • Spicq, C., Theological Lexicon of the New Testament, Peabody: Hendrickson, 1994, vol. 1theological-dictionary
  • Schmidt, J. H. H., Synonymik der griechischen Sprache, Leipzig 1876-86, vol. II §139lexicon
  • France, R. T., The Gospel of Mark (NIGTC), Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2002commentary
  • Marcus, J., Mark (Anchor Yale Bible), New Haven, 2000-2009commentary

All attested forms of ἐκπλήσσω

imperfect passive indicative 3p

ἐξεπλήσσοντο

Mat 7:28, Mat 19:25, Mat 22:33, Mrk 1:22, Mrk 6:2, Mrk 7:37, Mrk 10:26, Luk 4:32

imperfect passive indicative 3s

ἐξεπλήσσετο

Mrk 11:18

present passive infinitive

ἐκπλήσσεσθαι

Mat 13:54

present passive participle nominative m s

ἐκπλησσόμενος

Act 13:12

second-aorist passive indicative 3p

ἐξεπλάγησαν

Luk 2:48