StrongerBible

exapataō

ἐξαπατάω

GreekG1818deceive, beguile, ...

Appears 6 times · tap a cell to see the verses

Rom 7:11Rom 16:181Co 3:182Co 11:32Th 2:31Ti 2:14
Compound of
Word studyResearch-gradeex-ap-at-AH-ohverb

What exapataō means

to deceive: to lead someone into believing what is false

TranslatabilityApproximateCertaintyStrong

This is Paul's word for deception, and only Paul uses it in the New Testament, in just six places. It means to take someone in completely, to get them to accept something untrue. The plain sense is not in doubt: whether the deceiver is a false teacher, sin itself, Satan, or a person fooling themselves, the verb names the same act of leading a mind astray.

Older writers argued that the longer form of this verb (built on the shorter, ordinary word for deceiving, ἀπατάω) meant to deceive utterly or thoroughly. Most scholars today think the extra syllable had lost that force by Paul's day, so the two forms had become near-interchangeable, and any sense of a stronger deception comes from the surrounding context rather than from the word itself. That shift matters, because a good deal of older interpretation, especially of the verse about Eve, leaned on the idea that this verb was inherently the stronger one.

What stays constant is the company this word keeps. Four of its six uses look back to the garden of Eden and the serpent's deceiving of Eve, sometimes openly, sometimes by echo. For Paul, deception is the signature move of the fall, and he reaches for this verb when he wants that story in the background:

  • sin plays the serpent
  • false teachers do the serpent's work
  • the great rebellion at the end of the age repeats the same pattern
Rom 7:11Rom 16:181Co 3:182Co 11:32Th 2:31Ti 2:14
1Ti 2:14

What Paul's switch of verbs in 1 Timothy 2:14 means, using the longer form of the verb for Eve and the shorter form for Adam in a single sentence.

  • minorityThe longer verb signals that Eve was more thoroughly or completely deceived than Adam.; Thomas R. Schreiner, in Women in the Church, 3rd ed., eds. Kostenberger and Schreiner (2016); Paul Barnett, The Second Epistle to the Corinthians (NICNT, 1997)
  • majorityThe switch is stylistic variation with no difference in meaning, since the two verbs were interchangeable in Koine Greek; the deception of Eve illustrates the danger the letter addresses rather than a claim about female nature.; I. Howard Marshall, The Pastoral Epistles (ICC, 1999), 462-467; Philip H. Towner, The Letters to Timothy and Titus (NICNT, 2006), 224-237; Philip B. Payne, Man and Woman, One in Christ (Zondervan, 2009), 401-413; Douglas J. Moo, "1 Timothy 2:11-15: Meaning and Significance," Trinity Journal 1 NS (1980): 62-83
  • contestedThe contrast is qualitative, not gradational: Adam sinned with open eyes while Eve was genuinely taken in, matching Paul's placing of responsibility for the fall on Adam in Romans 5.; William D. Mounce, Pastoral Epistles (WBC 46, 2000), 137-143

What scholars say about exapataō

ἐξαπατάω is a Pauline word: five undisputed Pauline uses plus 1 Timothy 2:14, and no other New Testament author employs it. The central lexical question is whether the ἐκ-compound intensifies the simplex ἀπατάω ("deceive thoroughly") or is merely the Koine-default synonym. The older intensive reading (Thayer, Cremer, Trench, Robertson, Milligan) has largely yielded to the flattened view now reflected in BDAG, Louw-Nida (Domain 88.155 glosses both verbs identically), Oepke's TDNT article, Balz's EDNT entry, and Spicq's Theological Lexicon. The mechanism is the loss of prepositional force in Koine prefixed verbs (Moulton, Prolegomena; BDF 316-318), confirmed by Moulton-Milligan's papyri evidence that the compound was the ordinary word for fraud while the simplex had become rare. A middle position (Cranfield, Kasemann, Barnett, Weima) still hears a real intensive nuance in particular verses, but grants it arises from context, not the morpheme. Two threads shape interpretation. First, the Septuagint of Genesis 3:13 uses the simplex ἠπάτησεν of the serpent and Eve, whereas Paul uses the compound at 2 Corinthians 11:3 and 1 Timothy 2:14; Wevers attributes the LXX simplex to the archaizing style of the Pentateuch translator, and Josephus (Antiquities 1.49) already uses the compound of the serpent, so Paul's choice reflects his generation's default rather than deliberate intensification. Second, the 1 Timothy 2:14 alternation (compound of Eve, simplex of Adam) is textually secure and deliberate, but scholars increasingly agree the lexical argument alone cannot bear doctrinal weight: the two verbs stand as stylistic variation (Marshall, Towner, Payne, Moo, Belleville, Keener) or mark a qualitative rather than gradational contrast (Mounce, Knight). Beale reads the six occurrences as a unified theology of deception in which the Edenic fall recapitulates from Romans 7 through 2 Thessalonians 2 to the parousia.

In-depth research

This is a research paper, so it may be hard to read without scholarly background. It is useful if you want to dig even deeper into this word.

Sources

  • BDAG, s.v. ἐξαπατάω, ἀπατάω (3rd ed., 2000)lexicon
  • Louw-Nida, Greek-English Lexicon Based on Semantic Domains (1989), Domain 88.155lexicon
  • Armin Oepke, "ἀπατάω, ἐξαπατάω, ἀπάτη," in Theological Dictionary of the New Testament (TDNT) 1:384-385dictionary
  • Horst Balz, "ἐξαπατάω," in Exegetical Dictionary of the New Testament (EDNT) 1:117dictionary
  • Ceslas Spicq, Theological Lexicon of the New Testament (Hendrickson, 1994), 1:145-147dictionary
  • J. H. Moulton, A Grammar of New Testament Greek, vol. 1: Prolegomena (T&T Clark, 1908), 111-113monograph
  • F. Blass, A. Debrunner, R. Funk, A Greek Grammar of the New Testament, 316-318monograph
  • James Hope Moulton and George Milligan, The Vocabulary of the Greek Testament (1930), s.v. ἐξαπατάωlexicon
  • John W. Wevers, Notes on the Greek Text of Genesis (SBLSCS 35; Scholars Press, 1993)monograph
  • I. Howard Marshall, The Pastoral Epistles (ICC, 1999), 462-467commentary
  • Philip H. Towner, The Letters to Timothy and Titus (NICNT, 2006), 224-237commentary
  • Philip B. Payne, Man and Woman, One in Christ (Zondervan, 2009), 401-413monograph
  • Douglas J. Moo, "1 Timothy 2:11-15: Meaning and Significance," Trinity Journal 1 NS (1980): 62-83article
  • Jeffrey A. D. Weima, 1-2 Thessalonians (BECNT, 2014), 508-515commentary
  • Margaret E. Thrall, The Second Epistle to the Corinthians (ICC, 1994-2000), 2:660-666commentary
  • G. K. Beale, A New Testament Biblical Theology (Baker Academic, 2011)monograph

All attested forms of ἐξαπατάω

aorist active indicative 3s

ἐξηπάτησεν, ἐξηπάτησέν

2Co 11:3, Rom 7:11

aorist active subjunctive 3s

ἐξαπατήσῃ

2Th 2:3

aorist passive participle nominative f s

ἐξαπατηθεῖσα

1Ti 2:14

present active imperative 3s

ἐξαπατάτω

1Co 3:18

present active indicative 3p

ἐξαπατῶσιν

Rom 16:18