StrongerBible

helkuō, helkō

ἕλκω

GreekG1670draw, drag, ...

Appears 8 times · tap a cell to see the verses

Jhn 6:44Jhn 12:32Jhn 18:10Jhn 21:6Jhn 21:11Act 16:19Act 21:30Jas 2:6
Root family
Names & words formed with this
Akin to
Word studyHEL-kohverb

What helkuō, helkō means

1

to pull something or someone along by force: a sword drawn out, a net hauled in, a person dragged off.

TranslatabilityApproximateCertaintySettled

The picture behind the word is straightforward: something is taken hold of and pulled along toward whoever is doing the pulling. Effort is part of it. A blade has to be forced out of its sheath, and a net loaded with fish has to be worked up onto the shore.

When the thing pulled is a person, the same word turns menacing. In the New Testament it describes what a mob, an owner, or a rich creditor does: hands take hold, and the man ends up where he never meant to go.

  • Paul and Silas are hauled into the town square to face the city officials.
  • Paul is pulled out of the temple courts by a crowd that has already decided he is guilty.
  • The rich haul poor believers into court.

Greek had blunter options. One verb is used for scraping something along the ground (σύρω), another for snatching something out of a person's grip (ἁρπάζω). This one is the general word for a steady pull, which is why the same verb can cover a fisherman's work in the morning and an angry crowd in the afternoon.

Nuances

1ato pull an object out or in: a sword drawn from its sheath, a loaded net hauled through the water.
Jhn 18:10Jhn 21:6Jhn 21:11
1bto seize a person and haul them off against their will, usually to face a court or a hostile crowd.
TranslatabilityDirect
Act 16:19Act 21:30Jas 2:6
2

of God: to draw a person to Christ, the pull of God on someone who does not come on their own.

TranslatabilityPartialCertaintyStrong

Twice in John's Gospel the pulling is God's and the thing pulled is a person. In one place the Father draws people to the Son. In the other, the Son, once he has been lifted up on the cross, draws people to himself. Both statements come in scenes where people are refusing to believe, which is why they are worded the way they are: something has to move a person before that person comes.

Choosing this verb rather than a word for inviting was deliberate. The same verb hauls a net and drags a prisoner, so the pull is real and not a polite suggestion. The Old Testament had a matching Hebrew verb (מָשַׁךְ) that runs from hauling a load to God drawing his people in love, as in Jeremiah's line about being drawn with unfailing love, and the Greek Old Testament often renders that verb with this one. What the word does not settle on its own is whether the pull always succeeds: in one fishing scene the disciples take hold of the net and cannot bring it in.

That gap is where a long argument sits. Some scholars read the drawing as an act that certainly brings a person to Christ; others read it as God's genuine initiative that a person can still refuse. The verb fits either reading, and the wider question is decided from the rest of the Gospel and from theology, not from this word. It helps to keep it distinct from the Greek verb for calling (καλέω): the call is the summons that goes out, while this word names the pull that moves someone toward the one calling.

Jhn 6:44Jhn 12:32

Disputed

How much force the verb carries in John 6:44 and John 12:32: whether the drawing is a decisive act that certainly brings a person to Christ, or a genuine divine initiative that a person can still refuse.

  • contestedThe drawing is effective. In its ordinary use the verb describes a pull that actually moves what it takes hold of, and John 6:37 read together with 6:44 presents the Father's drawing as selective and successful, so those who are drawn do in fact come.; D. A. Carson, The Gospel according to John, Pillar New Testament Commentary (1991); D. A. Carson, Divine Sovereignty and Human Responsibility: Biblical Perspectives in Tension (1981)
  • contestedThe clause asserts that no one comes on their own initiative and that God acts first, but the verb does not by itself exclude refusal; the same verb in John 12:32 takes an unrestricted object, which tells against reading it as an individual and irresistible pull.; C. K. Barrett, The Gospel according to St John, 2nd ed. (1978); Craig S. Keener, The Gospel of John: A Commentary (2003)

What scholars say about helkuō, helkō

BDAG divides the verb three ways: moving an object by pulling (the sword of John 18:10, the net of John 21:6 and 21:11), compelling a person to go somewhere (Acts 16:19, Acts 21:30, James 2:6), and drawing a person inwardly toward Christ (John 6:44, John 12:32). LSJ documents the same range in classical usage, where the verb covers dragging, hauling, and towing, and TDNT treats the Johannine texts under the same head. The two spellings, ἕλκω and the stem ἑλκυ-, belong to one verb, which is why the New Testament forms alternate freely and STEPBible files them under a single number. On John 6:44 the standard commentaries divide: Carson argues that the verb's ordinary force, together with the logic of John 6:37, makes the Father's drawing effective and selective, while Barrett and Keener read the clause as asserting divine initiative without settling the question of irresistibility. Commentators regularly point to Jeremiah 31:3 (LXX 38:3), where the Greek Old Testament renders מָשַׁךְ with this verb, as background for the language of God drawing his people in love. In John 12:32 the object is textually uncertain, πάντας in most witnesses against πάντα in a few early ones (Metzger). The forcible-arrest texts reflect a standard idiom for hauling a defendant before a magistrate, noted in the commentaries on Acts and on James, where the plaintiffs of James 2:6 are the wealthy.

Sources

  • BDAG (Bauer, Danker, Arndt, Gingrich), A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature, 3rd ed. (2000), s.v. ἕλκωlexicon
  • LSJ (Liddell, Scott, Jones), A Greek-English Lexicon, 9th ed., s.v. ἕλκωlexicon
  • Theological Dictionary of the New Testament (TDNT), s.v. ἕλκωdictionary
  • D. A. Carson, The Gospel according to John, Pillar New Testament Commentary (1991)commentary
  • D. A. Carson, Divine Sovereignty and Human Responsibility: Biblical Perspectives in Tension (1981)monograph
  • C. K. Barrett, The Gospel according to St John, 2nd ed. (1978)commentary
  • Craig S. Keener, The Gospel of John: A Commentary (2003)commentary
  • Raymond E. Brown, The Gospel according to John (i-xii), Anchor Bible 29 (1966)commentary
  • Bruce M. Metzger, A Textual Commentary on the Greek New Testament, 2nd ed. (1994)commentary
  • C. K. Barrett, The Acts of the Apostles, International Critical Commentary (1994, 1998)commentary
  • Luke Timothy Johnson, The Letter of James, Anchor Bible 37A (1995)commentary

All attested forms of ἕλκω

aorist active indicative 3s

εἵλκυσεν

Jhn 18:10, Jhn 21:11

aorist active indicative 3p

εἵλκυσαν

Act 16:19

aorist active infinitive

ἑλκύσαι

Jhn 21:6

aorist active subjunctive 3s

ἑλκύσῃ

Jhn 6:44

future active indicative 1s

ἑλκύσω

Jhn 12:32

imperfect active indicative 3p

εἷλκον

Act 21:30

present active indicative 3p

ἕλκουσιν

Jas 2:6