StrongerBible

dikaioō

δικαιόω

GreekG1344justify, vindicate, ...

Appears 39 times · tap a cell to see the verses

Mat 11:19Mat 12:37Luk 7:29Luk 7:35Luk 10:29Luk 16:15Luk 18:14Act 13:39Act 13:39(38)Rom 2:13Rom 3:4Rom 3:20Rom 3:24Rom 3:26Rom 3:28Rom 3:30Rom 4:2Rom 4:5Rom 5:1Rom 5:9Rom 6:7Rom 8:30 (2×)Rom 8:331Co 4:41Co 6:11Gal 2:16 (3×)Gal 2:17Gal 3:8Gal 3:11Gal 3:24Gal 5:41Ti 3:16Tit 3:7Jas 2:21Jas 2:24Jas 2:25
Word studyResearch-gradedee-kai-OH-ohverb

What dikaioō means

to declare someone to be in the right: to hand down a favorable verdict, acquitting, clearing, or vindicating a person rather than making the person good

TranslatabilityPartialCertaintyStrong

This is a courtroom word. To justify someone is to announce a verdict about them, not to change what they are inside. A judge who justifies the accused does not make that person good; the judge declares that the person stands in the right. That is the settled core of the word across the major reference works, even though its form looks as if it should mean "to make righteous." The Greek Old Testament fixed the sense: the word stands as the exact opposite of "to condemn," and since no judge condemns a person by making them wicked, its partner cannot mean making a person good either. It renders a ruling.

In the letters of Paul this verdict becomes the center of the good news. God declares guilty people to be in the right, as a free gift, on the basis of trust in Christ rather than on a record of law-keeping. The sharpest line is that God "justifies the ungodly" (Romans 4:5): the ruling is a gift, not a wage earned. Elsewhere the same verb bends to nearby uses.

  • A person or a wise course of action is "vindicated," shown by results to have been right all along.
  • People can "justify" God by acknowledging that he is in the right.
  • A person can try to "justify himself," presenting himself as righteous to others.

The famous theological arguments that surround this word are mostly not arguments about the word itself. Whether the verdict also remakes the person from within, whose righteousness is credited to whom, and how a person receives it are debates about the salvation the word describes, not about the plain sense of the verb, which stays close to a judge clearing the accused.

Nuances

1aof God's saving verdict: to acquit and declare a person to be in the right before God, the core sense of justification by faith
Rom 2:13Rom 3:20Rom 3:24Rom 3:26Rom 3:28Rom 3:30Rom 4:2Rom 4:5Rom 5:1Rom 5:9Rom 8:30 (2×)Rom 8:33
1bto be vindicated: to be shown or proven to have been right, by results, by the evidence, or by one's actions
Mat 11:19Luk 7:351Ti 3:16Jas 2:21Jas 2:24Jas 2:25
1cto acknowledge or prove to be in the right, with God as the one declared righteous
Luk 7:29Rom 3:4
1dto justify oneself: to present oneself as being in the right
Luk 10:29Luk 16:15
1eto be set free or released from a claim
CertaintyContested
Rom 6:7

What scholars say about dikaioō

The lexical core is firmer than the theological polemics suggest: in biblical usage δικαιόω is forensic-declarative, "declare/pronounce righteous, acquit, vindicate," a Septuagintal calque on the hiphil הִצְדִּיק in courtroom settings (Deut 25:1; Exod 23:7; Prov 17:15; Isa 5:23; Ps 142:2 LXX = Rom 3:20). The morphology problem (denominative -όω verbs from adjectives are normally factitive, so δίκαιος + -όω would suggest "make righteous," as the Vulgate's iustificare rendered it) is answered by Gottlob Schrenk (TDNT 2:211-219), who classed δικαιόω with the aestimative -όω verbs (ἀξιόω, ὁμοιόω) and pointed to the antonymic pair with καταδικάζω, which cannot mean "make wicked." The forensic reading is followed by BDAG, Cranfield (ICC), Moo (NICNT), Schreiner (BECNT), and, notably for a Catholic, Fitzmyer (AB Romans), who calls the Vulgate's iustificare a mistranslation; Romans 4:5 (τὸν δικαιοῦντα τὸν ἀσεβῆ) is treated as decisive against a transformative-only reading. Dissent survives at the edges: Chris VanLandingham argues for "make righteous"; Louw-Nida flag a relational/covenantal domain alongside the forensic; and effective-word readings (Käsemann's Gabe und Macht, Kertelge's Wirkwort in EDNT, the Catholic and Orthodox transformative traditions) hold verdict and reality inseparable. Isa 53:11 LXX (with object לָרַבִּים) and Rom 6:7 are the chief candidates for an effective/liberative extension. Charles Lee Irons (WUNT II/386, 2015) mounts the most thorough recent lexical case that the associated δικαιοσύνη θεοῦ is a genitive of source (gift-status from God) rather than covenant faithfulness. Non-Pauline usage confirms the range without transformation: Luke 7:29 (people justify God), Luke 7:35 // Matt 11:19 (wisdom vindicated), Luke 10:29; 16:15 (justify oneself), Luke 18:14 (the tax collector went home δεδικαιωμένος), and James 2:21-25 (Abraham and Rahab shown righteous by works). The live disputes (the New Perspective of Sanders, Dunn, and Wright; the imputation question; the πίστις Χριστοῦ genitive) concern the theological frame and content of the verdict, not the lexical sense of the verb.

Where scholars disagree about dikaioō

Whether δικαιόω is purely declarative (God pronounces a person righteous) or also effective (God's declaration itself makes the person righteous). Lexically the declarative reading is the majority; the disagreement is real but is closely bound up with confessional theology.

  • majorityForensic-declarative only: the verb renders a verdict, declaring a person to be in the right without in itself making the person inwardly righteous, on the analogy of the aestimative -όω verbs and the antonymic pairing with καταδικάζω.; Gottlob Schrenk, "δικαιόω," TDNT 2:211-219; C. E. B. Cranfield, Romans (ICC, 1975), 1:95-99; Douglas J. Moo, Romans (NICNT, 2nd ed., 2018), pp. 86-90; Joseph A. Fitzmyer, Romans (Anchor Bible, 1993), pp. 117-119
  • minorityEffective/transformative: the divine declaration also makes the person righteous, beginning a real change of the person, so "make righteous" is the better rendering.; Chris VanLandingham, Judgment and Justification in Early Judaism and the Apostle Paul (Hendrickson, 2006), pp. 242-332; John Meyendorff, Byzantine Theology (Fordham, 1979), pp. 143-146; Council of Trent, Decree on Justification (Session VI, 1547), ch. 7
  • minorityBoth together: God's verdict is an effective word that cannot be split from the reality it creates, so the declaration both acquits and renews.; Ernst Käsemann, "Gottesgerechtigkeit bei Paulus," in New Testament Questions of Today (1969), pp. 168-182; Karl Kertelge, "δικαιόω," EDNT 1:330-334; Michael F. Bird, The Saving Righteousness of God (Paternoster, 2007), ch. 4
In-depth research

This is a research paper, so it may be hard to read without scholarly background. It is useful if you want to dig even deeper into this word.

Sources

  • F. W. Danker, BDAG (3rd ed., 2000), pp. 249-250, s.v. δικαιόωlexicon
  • Gottlob Schrenk, "δικαιόω," TDNT 2:211-219theological-dictionary
  • Karl Kertelge, "δικαιόω," EDNT 1:330-334theological-dictionary
  • Moisés Silva (rev. Brown), NIDNTTE 1:723-744theological-dictionary
  • J. P. Louw & E. A. Nida, Greek-English Lexicon Based on Semantic Domains (1989), §§34.46, 56.34lexicon
  • C. E. B. Cranfield, Romans (ICC, T&T Clark, 1975), 1:95-99, 231-233commentary
  • Douglas J. Moo, Romans (NICNT, 2nd ed., Eerdmans, 2018), pp. 86-90, 264-267commentary
  • Thomas R. Schreiner, Romans (BECNT, Baker, 1998), pp. 184-186, 216commentary
  • Joseph A. Fitzmyer, Romans (Anchor Bible, 1993), pp. 117-119, 257-263, 374commentary
  • Charles Lee Irons, The Righteousness of God: A Lexical Examination of the Covenant-Faithfulness Interpretation (WUNT II/386; Mohr Siebeck, 2015)monograph
  • Ernst Käsemann, "Gottesgerechtigkeit bei Paulus," ET in New Testament Questions of Today (1969), pp. 168-182article
  • James D. G. Dunn, "The New Perspective on Paul," BJRL 65 (1983): 95-122article
  • N. T. Wright, Justification: God's Plan and Paul's Vision (IVP, 2009)monograph
  • Douglas J. Moo, James (Pillar, Eerdmans, 2000), p. 141commentary

All attested forms of δικαιόω

aorist passive indicative 3s

ἐδικαιώθη

Mat 11:19, Luk 7:35, Rom 4:2, 1Ti 3:16, Jas 2:21, Jas 2:25

present passive indicative 3s

δικαιοῦται

Act 13:39, Gal 2:16, Gal 3:11, Jas 2:24

aorist passive participle nominative m p

δικαιωθέντες, Δικαιωθέντες

Rom 5:9, Tit 3:7, Rom 5:1

aorist active indicative 3s

ἐδικαίωσεν

Rom 8:30, Rom 8:30

aorist passive infinitive

δικαιωθῆναι

Act 13:39, Gal 2:17

aorist passive subjunctive 1p

δικαιωθῶμεν

Gal 2:16, Gal 3:24

future passive indicative 3s

δικαιωθήσεται

Rom 3:20, Gal 2:16

present active participle accusative m s

δικαιοῦντα

Rom 3:26, Rom 4:5

aorist active indicative 3p

ἐδικαίωσαν

Luk 7:29

aorist active infinitive

δικαιῶσαι

Luk 10:29

aorist passive indicative 2p

ἐδικαιώθητε

1Co 6:11

aorist passive subjunctive 2s

δικαιωθῇς

Rom 3:4

future active indicative 3s

δικαιώσει

Rom 3:30

future passive indicative 2s

δικαιωθήσῃ

Mat 12:37

future passive indicative 3p

δικαιωθήσονται

Rom 2:13

perfect passive indicative 1s

δεδικαίωμαι

1Co 4:4

perfect passive indicative 3s

δεδικαίωται

Rom 6:7

perfect passive participle nominative m s

δεδικαιωμένος

Luk 18:14

present active indicative 3s

δικαιοῖ

Gal 3:8

present active participle nominative m p

δικαιοῦντες

Luk 16:15

present active participle nominative m s

δικαιῶν

Rom 8:33

present passive indicative 2p

δικαιοῦσθε

Gal 5:4

present passive infinitive

δικαιοῦσθαι

Rom 3:28

present passive participle nominative m p

δικαιούμενοι

Rom 3:24