Beliar: a Jewish name for Satan, the ruler of evil, named as the exact opposite of Christ
This word appears once in the whole New Testament, in 2 Corinthians 6:15, where it names the being the New Testament usually calls Satan (Σατανᾶς) or the devil (διάβολος). The verse asks what agreement Christ has with him, and the expected answer is none at all.
The name has a long history behind it. In the Old Testament the Hebrew word behind it (בליעל) is not a name at all but an insult meaning "worthlessness" or "good for nothing," used most often in the phrase "sons of Belial," that is, scoundrels. The ancient Greek translation of the Old Testament never carried the word over as a name; it used ordinary words for a lawless or worthless person instead. Only in Jewish writings from the centuries just before the New Testament, above all the Dead Sea Scrolls, does the word harden into the personal name of a prince of darkness who commands the forces of evil against God.
By the time this letter was written that use was standard, and the verse assumes its readers know it. The paragraph it sits in is built out of stark pairs: right living against lawlessness, light against darkness, Christ against Beliar, a believer against an unbeliever, God's temple against idols. Naming Satan "Beliar" sets him at the far end of that line, as the dark counterpart to Christ himself.
The spelling is worth noticing. The Greek here ends in r, "Beliar," rather than the l of the Hebrew form, "Belial." Scholars trace the change to the way the name was said in Aramaic and related languages, and the r spelling is the usual one in Jewish Greek writings of the period.
Whether 2 Corinthians 6:14 to 7:1, the paragraph containing this word, is a non-Pauline interpolation, a pre-existing fragment Paul adapted, or Paul's own composition. The presence of this name, which Paul never uses elsewhere, together with the paragraph's Qumran-like light and darkness dualism and its otherwise rare vocabulary, is a central piece of evidence in the argument.
- contestedThe paragraph is a non-Pauline insertion, Jewish or Essene in character, placed into the letter by a later hand; on the strongest form of this view its theology is not merely un-Pauline but opposed to Paul.; Joseph A. Fitzmyer, "Qumran and the Interpolated Paragraph in 2 Cor 6:14-7:1," Catholic Biblical Quarterly 23 (1961): 271-280; Hans Dieter Betz, "2 Cor 6:14-7:1: An Anti-Pauline Fragment?" Journal of Biblical Literature 92 (1973): 88-108; Joachim Gnilka, "2 Cor 6:14-7:1 in the Light of the Qumran Texts and the Testaments of the Twelve Patriarchs," in Paul and Qumran, ed. J. Murphy-O'Connor (1968)
- contestedThe paragraph is a pre-existing fragment shaped by Qumran-style thinking that Paul himself modified and inserted at this point in the letter.; Ralph P. Martin, 2 Corinthians, Word Biblical Commentary (1985)
- contestedPaul wrote the paragraph himself, drawing on Jewish apocalyptic language he shared with his contemporaries; its temple imagery has genuine parallels elsewhere in his letters.; Bertil Gärtner, The Temple and the Community in Qumran and the New Testament (Cambridge, 1965)