StrongerBible

anegklētos

ἀνέγκλητος

GreekG0410blameless, above reproach, ...

Appears 5 times · tap a cell to see the verses

1Co 1:8Col 1:221Ti 3:10Tit 1:6Tit 1:7
Compound of
Word studyResearch-gradean-ENG-klay-tosadjective

What anegklētos means

unaccusable: so clear of any real charge that no accusation against the person would stand.

TranslatabilityApproximateCertaintySettled

This is a word from the courtroom. It is built from a negative prefix plus the ordinary Greek verb for bringing a legal charge against someone (ἐγκαλέω, "to accuse"), so it means, quite literally, "not chargeable": a person against whom no accusation can be made to stick. In everyday Greek life it was the stock word for a public official who finished his term of office and no citizen came forward to complain: the accounts were approved, the audit passed, the case closed.

Paul reaches for it in two very different settings:

  • Of God's people at the last day, promising that they will stand before God with no charge that can be brought against them (1 Corinthians 1:8; Colossians 1:22).
  • Of candidates for church leadership, requiring elders and deacons whose examined lives turn up no sustainable complaint (1 Timothy 3:10; Titus 1:6 and 1:7).

The key nuance is that the word is objective, not a matter of reputation. One neighbor word for "blameless" (ἄμεμπτος) is about whether people happen to find fault with you; this word is about whether a charge would actually hold up. Its closest overlap is with the term rendered "above reproach" (ἀνεπίλημπτος), which pictures giving an opponent no handhold to grab. In Colossians it stands next to a purity word, "without blemish" (ἄμωμος).

There is a deep resonance beneath the two church settings. When Paul says believers will be unaccusable, he is answering in a single word his own challenge in Romans, "Who will bring a charge against God's elect?", which uses the very verb this word is built from. No one will, because no charge is admissible.

Nuances

1aof God's people at the final judgment: kept by God so that they stand before him with no charge that can be brought against them.
1Co 1:8Col 1:22
1bof a candidate for church office: someone whose examined life shows a clean public record, with no sustainable complaint against them.
1Ti 3:10Tit 1:6Tit 1:7

Disputed

How much of the word's forensic, administrative flavor Paul intends in the church-office qualification lists, and whether his switch from anepilēmptos (1 Timothy 3:2) to anenklētos in Titus 1:6-7 is deliberate.

  • majorityIn the qualification lists the word functions as a general "above reproach," essentially interchangeable with the near-synonym anepilēmptos used in 1 Timothy 3:2; the variation between the two is stylistic rather than loaded.; I. Howard Marshall (with Philip H. Towner), The Pastoral Epistles, ICC (T&T Clark, 1999); William D. Mounce, Pastoral Epistles, WBC 46 (Nelson, 2000); George W. Knight III, The Pastoral Epistles, NIGTC (Eerdmans, 1992)
  • minorityThe word keeps its administrative, courtroom coloring: Paul chose it in Titus to match the picture of the overseer as God's household steward, echoing the standard honor Greek cities paid to officials whose public audit produced no successful accusation.; Ceslas Spicq, Theological Lexicon of the New Testament, tr. James Ernest (Hendrickson, 1994), s.v.; Jerome D. Quinn, The Letter to Titus, AB 35 (Doubleday, 1990), on 1:6
  • minorityThe word is subtly distinct from its neighbor: it means "unaccused" (no charge has actually been lodged), whereas anepilēmptos means offering no ground to lay hold of a charge in the first place.; R. C. Trench, Synonyms of the New Testament, section ciii

What scholars say about anegklētos

The lexical consensus is firm: anenklētos is formed from the privative prefix plus a verbal adjective of egkaleō ("to bring a charge, to arraign"; cognate noun enklēma, "indictment"), giving the potential-passive sense "not able to be called to account." BDAG glosses "blameless, irreproachable"; LSJ distinguishes personal-moral, juridical, and (rarely) an active "uncomplainingly"; Louw-Nida (88.318) place it wholly in the ethical domain, treating the forensic derivation as etymological color. Grundmann (TDNT 1:356-358) presses the forensic reading most strongly, as objective (the impossibility of a charge) rather than subjective. Documentary evidence gathered by Moulton-Milligan and Spicq shows the term was a stock formula of Hellenistic civic life: Aristotle ties it to the audit of financial officials (Politics 1321b22), honorific decrees use the formula anenklēton heauton parechein of benefactors, and contractual papyri (e.g. SB 7619.22) use it as a quittance clause discharging legal liability; it appears in the Greek Old Testament only at 3 Maccabees 5:31 and in Josephus (Antiquities 17.289) of those not chargeable in the disturbances after Herod's death. For the eschatological texts (1 Corinthians 1:8; Colossians 1:22) the commentary tradition is largely agreed that the word is forensic and God-given, not a demand for moral perfection (Thiselton, Fee, Garland on 1 Corinthians; Dunn, O'Brien, Lohse on Colossians, where a cultic overtone from the accompanying amōmos is also heard); the intertextual anchor is Romans 8:33, tis egkalesei kata eklektōn theou. For the Pastoral Epistles opinion divides three ways: a majority (Marshall, Mounce, Knight, Towner, Fee) treats anenklētos as functionally equivalent to anepilēmptos (1 Timothy 3:2), a general "above reproach"; a minority following Spicq and Quinn preserves the administrative, forensic flavor and reads the choice in Titus as evoking the steward (oikonomos) image; and an older tradition (Trench) presses a lexical distinction between "unaccused" and "unimpeachable." The disagreement is over connotational weight and pragmatic force, not lexical denotation.

In-depth research

This is a research paper, so it may be hard to read without scholarly background. It is useful if you want to dig even deeper into this word.

Sources

  • BDAG, Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament, 3rd ed. (2000), s.v. ἀνέγκλητος (p. 64)lexicon
  • LSJ, A Greek-English Lexicon, s.v. ἀνέγκλητοςlexicon
  • Johannes P. Louw and Eugene A. Nida, Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament Based on Semantic Domains, 2nd ed. (1989), 88.318lexicon
  • James Hope Moulton and George Milligan, The Vocabulary of the Greek Testament (1930), 40dictionary
  • Ceslas Spicq, Theological Lexicon of the New Testament, tr. James Ernest (Hendrickson, 1994), s.v.dictionary
  • Walter Grundmann, "ἐγκαλέω, ἔγκλημα, ἀνέγκλητος," in Theological Dictionary of the New Testament (TDNT) 1:356-358dictionary
  • Horst Balz and Gerhard Schneider, eds., Exegetical Dictionary of the New Testament (EDNT) 1:92dictionary
  • Anthony C. Thiselton, The First Epistle to the Corinthians, NIGTC (Eerdmans, 2000), on 1 Cor 1:8commentary
  • Gordon D. Fee, The First Epistle to the Corinthians, rev. ed., NICNT (Eerdmans, 2014), on 1 Cor 1:8commentary
  • David E. Garland, 1 Corinthians, BECNT (Baker, 2003), on 1:8commentary
  • James D. G. Dunn, The Epistles to the Colossians and to Philemon, NIGTC (Eerdmans, 1996), on 1:22commentary
  • Peter T. O'Brien, Colossians, Philemon, WBC 44 (Word, 1982), on 1:22commentary
  • Eduard Lohse, Colossians and Philemon, Hermeneia (Fortress, 1971), 65commentary
  • I. Howard Marshall (with Philip H. Towner), The Pastoral Epistles, ICC (T&T Clark, 1999)commentary
  • William D. Mounce, Pastoral Epistles, WBC 46 (Nelson, 2000)commentary
  • George W. Knight III, The Pastoral Epistles, NIGTC (Eerdmans, 1992)commentary
  • Jerome D. Quinn, The Letter to Titus, AB 35 (Doubleday, 1990), on 1:6commentary
  • R. C. Trench, Synonyms of the New Testament, section ciiimonograph

All attested forms of ἀνέγκλητος

accusative m p

ἀνεγκλήτους

1Co 1:8, Col 1:22

accusative m s

ἀνέγκλητον

Tit 1:7

nominative m p

ἀνέγκλητοι

1Ti 3:10

nominative m s

ἀνέγκλητος

Tit 1:6