StrongerBible

tsemaḥ

צֶמַח

HebrewH6780Branch, growth, ...

Appears 12 times · tap a cell to see the verses

Gen 19:25Psa 65:10(11)Isa 4:2Isa 61:11Jer 23:5Jer 33:15Ezk 16:7Ezk 17:9Ezk 17:10Hos 8:7Zec 3:8Zec 6:12
Root family
Word studyTSEH-makhnoun

What tsemaḥ means

what has sprouted: the fresh growth a field or plant puts out, and by extension the ruler God promises to grow from David's line

TranslatabilityPartialCertaintyStrong

This word names the thing that has sprouted. It belongs to the same family as the verb for springing up out of the ground (צָמַח), and its plainest use is farming language: the green cover on a field, the crops a season yields, the leaves a vine puts out. Genesis uses it for everything that grew on the ground of the valley God overthrew, and Psalm 65 for the growth a well watered land is blessed with.

From there the prophets take the same ordinary word and apply it to a person. Jeremiah and Zechariah announce that God will make new growth spring up for David, and Zechariah goes so far as to make it the man's name. The picture is doing real work: it says that a royal line brought low will put out fresh growth because God makes it grow, in the same way a field grows because rain falls on it.

What holds the uses together is that in every one of them something is coming up where nothing was showing. That is why one short word can cover a field of grain and a promised king, and why the prophets keep setting the noun beside its own verb, so that the promise sounds like planting rather than politics.

Nuances

1athe green growth of the ground: the plants, grass, and crops that a field or a land puts out
TranslatabilityApproximate
Gen 19:25Psa 65:10(11)Isa 4:2Isa 61:11Ezk 16:7
Isa 4:2

Whether the phrase rendered "the growth of the LORD" in Isaiah 4:2 names what the land produces or names a person. The parallel line speaks of "the fruit of the land," which favours a harvest; on the other side, this is the earliest place where the noun stands beside the divine name, which is how it works in the royal promises of Jeremiah 23:5 and Zechariah 6:12. Neither reading has won the field.

  • contestedThe phrase names the produce of the restored land, matching the parallel line about the fruit of the earth and the promise of abundance for the survivors of Israel.; Hans Wildberger, Isaiah 1-12 (Continental Commentaries; Fortress, 1991), on 4:2
  • contestedThe phrase names a person, the royal figure God will raise up, read as the later promises in Jeremiah and Zechariah are read; this is the reading behind the traditional rendering "the Branch of the LORD."; BDB, s.v. צֶמַח
1bthe new growth a single plant puts out: the shoots, leaves, or sprouting grain that come up on it
TranslatabilityApproximate
Ezk 17:9Ezk 17:10Hos 8:7
1cthe ruler God promises to make grow up from David's line, traditionally called the Branch
Jer 23:5Jer 33:15Zec 3:8Zec 6:12

What scholars say about tsemaḥ

The lexica are agreed on the sense. BDB and HALOT both give the noun as growth or sprout, what springs up, derived from the verb צמח, and both separate the plain agricultural uses from the figurative application to a coming ruler; DCH treats the range the same way. Almost all the interest of the word lies in the four royal texts, Jeremiah 23:5 and 33:15 with Zechariah 3:8 and 6:12, where the Septuagint renders it ἀνατολή, a rising, a choice that shifts the image from vegetation to dawn and stands behind the language of Luke 1:78. Wolter H. Rose's monograph Zemah and Zerubbabel is the fullest modern treatment of these oracles; it argues that the Zechariah texts do not simply identify the figure with Zerubbabel, against the identification favoured by Carol and Eric Meyers in their Anchor Bible commentary on Haggai and Zechariah 1-8. Isaiah 4:2 is the disputed case, taken as agricultural abundance by Wildberger and as a person in the lexical tradition that files it with the royal texts. The line in Hosea 8:7 is textually uneven, and Wolff's Hermeneia commentary surveys the corrections that have been proposed for it. The treatment followed here agrees with the lexica in taking the royal usage as a figurative extension of ordinary plant vocabulary rather than as a fixed title.

Sources

  • HALOT, s.v. צֶמַחlexicon
  • BDB, s.v. צֶמַחlexicon
  • DCH, vol. 7, s.v. צֶמַחlexicon
  • TDOT, s.v. צמחtheological-dictionary
  • Wolter H. Rose, Zemah and Zerubbabel: Messianic Expectations in the Early Postexilic Period (JSOTSup 304; Sheffield Academic Press, 2000)monograph
  • Carol L. Meyers and Eric M. Meyers, Haggai, Zechariah 1-8 (Anchor Bible 25B; Doubleday, 1987)commentary
  • Hans Wildberger, Isaiah 1-12 (Continental Commentaries; Fortress, 1991)commentary
  • Hans Walter Wolff, Hosea (Hermeneia; Fortress, 1974)commentary

All attested forms of צֶמַח

m s absolute

צֶמַח

Jer 23:5, Hos 8:7, Zec 3:8, Zec 6:12

m s construct

צֶמַח

Gen 19:25, Isa 4:2, Jer 33:15, Ezk 16:7

m s construct

צִמְחָהּ

Psa 65:10, Isa 61:11, Ezk 17:9, Ezk 17:10