StrongerBible

patal

פָּתַל

HebrewH6617wrestled, crooked, ...

Appears 5 times · tap a cell to see the verses

Gen 30:82Sa 22:27Job 5:13Psa 18:26(27)Pro 8:8
Root family
Word studyResearch-gradepah-TAHLverb

What patal means

to twist: to be wound out of straightness, whether two rivals locked together or a person, a word, or a response bent away from the straight

TranslatabilityPartialCertaintyStrong

The picture behind this word is rope-making: strands wound around one another so that no single fiber runs straight anymore. Hebrew never uses this verb for the actual craft. That stays with the matching noun for a twisted cord (פָּתִיל), the thread that seals a jar, fastens a priest's breastpiece, and measures a temple. All five appearances of the verb are already pictures, and the picture is always the same: something wound out of true.

The five uses fall into three groups.

  • Rachel calls her long rivalry with her sister a twisting, two women wound around each other like strands in a rope (Genesis 30:8).
  • Wisdom writing turns the word into a label: it marks people whose thinking has gone crooked and speech that has been bent out of shape (Job 5:13, Proverbs 8:8).
  • David's song of thanksgiving aims the word at God, who answers a crooked man in the shape of the man's own crookedness (2 Samuel 22:27, Psalm 18:26).

Hebrew habitually pairs this word with another word for crooked (עִקֵּשׁ), so tightly that the two travel together from the Song of Moses into the wisdom books. Behind the pairing is a simple map of the moral world: a good life runs straight, and wrongdoing is what a twist looks like. That is why an intensified adjective built on the same root can indict a whole generation as utterly twisted (פְּתַלְתֹּל), and why the Greek Old Testament's rendering of that pair, "crooked and warped," carries the same charge into the New Testament's description of a crooked generation.

The boldest use is the last one. Saying that God twists with the twisted sounded as strange in Hebrew as it does in English, and it was meant to. Scholars still argue over how far the mirror goes: whether the line claims God matches crookedness with crookedness, meets the crooked man with a shrewdness he cannot outmaneuver, or merely looks twisted to eyes that are themselves bent.

Nuances

1ato twist oneself together with someone: to grapple, to struggle against a rival
TranslatabilityApproximateCertaintySettled
Gen 30:8
1btwisted, crooked: warped in character, in scheming, or in speech
TranslatabilityDirectCertaintySettled
Job 5:13Pro 8:8
1cto meet a crooked person in kind: to answer the twist with a twist
CertaintyContested
2Sa 22:27Psa 18:26(27)
Psa 18:26

What it means for God to be described with this verb: whether the line asserts a mirrored crookedness, a shrewdness, or only an appearance of twistedness to the crooked person.

  • majorityStrict mirrored recompense: God answers crookedness with a correspondingly twisted response, and the rhetorical shock is intended by the poet, in line with archaic act-consequence theology.; H.-J. Kraus, Psalms 1-59, Continental Commentary (Fortress, 1988), 261-63; P. C. Craigie, Psalms 1-50, WBC 19 (Word, 1983), 172, 176; M. Dahood, Psalms I: 1-50, AB 16 (Doubleday, 1966), 105, 116
  • minorityThe verb here shades into shrewdness or cunning rather than moral crookedness, exploiting the range the root already shows at Job 5:13, where God unravels the counsel of the crafty.; A. P. Ross, A Commentary on the Psalms, vol. 1, Kregel Exegetical Library (Kregel, 2011), ad Ps 18:26-27; G. H. Wilson, Psalms, vol. 1, NIV Application Commentary (Zondervan, 2002), ad Ps 18; T. Longman III, Psalms, TOTC 15-16 (IVP, 2014), ad Ps 18
  • minorityThe form is estimative: God only seems twisted from the vantage point of the crooked person, so the verse concerns perception rather than divine character.; B. K. Waltke and M. O'Connor, An Introduction to Biblical Hebrew Syntax (Eisenbrauns, 1990), sec. 26.2f
2Sa 22:27

Why the verb in 2 Samuel 22:27 is a letter shorter than its counterpart in Psalm 18:27 (English 18:26), and whether it is even the same word.

  • contestedA genuine variant form of the same verb, produced by metathesis of the taw and pe followed by assimilation, an unusual but attested type of development.; GKC (Gesenius-Kautzsch-Cowley), Hebrew Grammar, 2nd Eng. ed., sec. 54c; P. Joüon and T. Muraoka, A Grammar of Biblical Hebrew (Pontifical Biblical Institute, 2006), sec. 17b; C. F. Keil and F. Delitzsch, Biblical Commentary on the Books of Samuel, ad 2 Sam 22:27; A. E. Steinmann, 2 Samuel, Concordia Commentary (Concordia, 2017), ad 22:27
  • contestedA transmission error in 2 Samuel, with the Psalm 18 form original.; P. K. McCarter, II Samuel, AB 9 (Doubleday, 1984), 458-59; D. G. Firth, 1 and 2 Samuel, Apollos Old Testament Commentary 8 (IVP, 2009), ad 22:27
  • minorityA deliberate wordplay on the root meaning tasteless or foolish, echoing the name Ahithophel, whose twisted counsel shadows the narrative of David's reign.; R. F. Youngblood, "1, 2 Samuel," Expositor's Bible Commentary 3 (Zondervan, 1992), ad 2 Sam 22:27

What scholars say about patal

The lexicographical tradition treats פתל as a single root whose concrete sense is "twist, twine, plait" (the manual production of cordage), from which every biblical use is metaphorical. BDB 836 glosses the verb simply "twist," comparing Arabic fatala, Ethiopic fatala, and Aramaic/Syriac ptl as cognates "chiefly in figurative senses," and parses Gen 30:8 as Niphal 1cs "I have wrestled (lit. twisted myself) with," Job 5:13 as "the plan of the tortuous," Prov 8:8 as "tortuous and twisted," and Ps 18:27 as "with the twisted thou dost deal tortuously." HALOT organizes the same data genetically, leading with the comparative Semitic dossier (Akkadian patalu with the derived pitiltu = Sum. su-sar "twisted rope," Arabic fatala/fatil, Old South Arabian ftl, Ge'ez fatala, Jewish Aramaic and Syriac petal) and distinguishing (i) Niphal reciprocal "wrestle" (Gen 30:8), (ii) Niphal stative "be twisted, tortuous" (Job 5:13; Prov 8:8), and (iii) Hitpael "show oneself tortuous, deal cunningly" (Ps 18:27; 2 Sam 22:27). DCH 6 (Clines) dispenses with etymology and treats the ethical uses as their own sense-cluster, routinely collocating niptal with the semantic string 'qs, 'wh, hpk. Ringgren (TDOT XII) argues that the concrete "twist" is primary, that the extension "twist > crooked > crafty" is a cross-Semitic development independently attested in Arabic, that Gen 30:8 is the semantic bridge between physical entwining and ethical torsion, and that the reciprocal formulation of 2 Sam 22:27 // Ps 18:27 is best read as strictly formal reciprocity, God adapting the mode of self-manifestation without ethical compromise; Wakely (NIDOTTE 3) situates the root in the synonym cluster with 'qs, 'wh, and hpk and treats Deut 32:5 as programmatic for the covenantal semantics of straightness versus torsion. TLOT gives the root no entry, falling below its frequency threshold and handling it under 'qs. The word-pair 'iqqes // ptl (Deut 32:5; Prov 8:8; Ps 18:27) is a fixed Hebrew pair for moral perversity (Avishur), transmitted through LXX skolia kai diestrammene into the NT formula of Phil 2:15, Acts 2:40, and Matt 17:17. On Gen 30:8 the majority modern reading takes 'elohim in naptule 'elohim as an intensifier (Skinner, Speiser, Westermann, Hamilton, Sarna, Mathews; cf. Winton Thomas, who calls the case probable but ambiguous), against the traditional "with God" of Rashi, Onqelos, and KJV; Gunkel, Westermann, and Sarna treat the tribal etymology as popular explanation, while BDB and Gesenius 18 keep the derivation from ptl but retrieve "Crafty One" as the plausible original sense. On Job 5:13 the participle is substantival and habitual (Clines, WBC 17: "the schemes of the wily"), rendered by LXX polyplokon ("many-plaited"), preserving the etymological literalness; on Prov 8:8 Waltke (NICOT) and Fox (AYB 18A) read the pair as a hyperbolic guarantee of Wisdom's transparency, with LXX skolion and strangalodes again preserving the rope imagery. On the doublet 2 Sam 22:27 titappal // Ps 18:27 titpattal, GKC sec. 54c and Joüon-Muraoka sec. 17b countenance metathesis plus assimilation, McCarter and Firth judge the Psalm reading original, and Youngblood floats paronomasia on tpl and the name Ahithophel; Cross and Freedman (JBL 72 [1953]: 15-34) treat the two recensions as independent transmissions of a tenth-century royal poem and favor the Psalm reading semantically. The interpretive crux of that line divides between strict judicial reciprocity (Luther, Calvin, Keil-Delitzsch, Kraus, Craigie, Dahood, McCarter), semantic softening to "shrewd" (NJPS, Ross, Wilson, Longman), and an estimative reading (Waltke-O'Connor sec. 26.2f; Augustine), with Goldingay (BCOT) leaving the ambiguity deliberately open.

In-depth research

This is a research paper, so it may be hard to read without scholarly background. It is useful if you want to dig even deeper into this word.

Sources

  • BDB (Brown-Driver-Briggs), A Hebrew and English Lexicon of the Old Testament, p. 836, s.v. פתלlexicon
  • HALOT (Koehler-Baumgartner-Stamm), s.v. פתל, פתיל, פתלתל, נפתוליםlexicon
  • D. J. A. Clines, ed., The Dictionary of Classical Hebrew, vol. 6 (Sheffield Phoenix, 2007), s.v. פתלlexicon
  • Gesenius, Hebräisches und Aramäisches Handwörterbuch, 18th ed., ed. H. Donner (Springer, 2013), s.v. פתלlexicon
  • H. Ringgren, "פתל," in Theological Dictionary of the Old Testament, vol. 12 (Eerdmans, 2003)theological-dictionary
  • R. Wakely, "פתל," in New International Dictionary of Old Testament Theology and Exegesis, vol. 3 (Zondervan, 1997)theological-dictionary
  • D. Winton Thomas, "A Consideration of Some Unusual Ways of Expressing the Superlative in Hebrew," Vetus Testamentum 3 (1953): 209-24article
  • F. M. Cross and D. N. Freedman, "A Royal Song of Thanksgiving: II Samuel 22 = Psalm 18," Journal of Biblical Literature 72 (1953): 15-34article
  • H.-J. Kraus, Psalms 1-59, Continental Commentary (Fortress, 1988), 261-63commentary
  • P. C. Craigie, Psalms 1-50, WBC 19 (Word, 1983), 172, 176commentary
  • P. K. McCarter, II Samuel, AB 9 (Doubleday, 1984), 458-59commentary
  • D. J. A. Clines, Job 1-20, WBC 17 (Word, 1989), ad 5:13commentary
  • B. K. Waltke, The Book of Proverbs: Chapters 1-15, NICOT (Eerdmans, 2004), ad 8:8commentary
  • M. V. Fox, Proverbs 1-9, Anchor Yale Bible 18A (Doubleday, 2000), ad 8:6-9commentary
  • C. Westermann, Genesis 12-36, Continental Commentary (Augsburg, 1985), ad 30:8commentary
  • V. P. Hamilton, The Book of Genesis: Chapters 18-50, NICOT (Eerdmans, 1995), ad 30:8commentary
  • G. J. Wenham, Genesis 16-50, WBC 2 (Word, 1994), ad 30:8commentary
  • J. H. Tigay, Deuteronomy, JPS Torah Commentary (Jewish Publication Society, 1996), ad 32:5commentary
  • J. Goldingay, Psalms, vol. 1: Psalms 1-41, Baker Commentary on the Old Testament (Baker Academic, 2006), 265-66commentary
  • Y. Avishur, Stylistic Studies of Word-Pairs in Biblical and Ancient Semitic Literatures, AOAT 210 (Butzon und Bercker, 1984)monograph
  • P. Sanders, The Provenance of Deuteronomy 32, Oudtestamentische Studiën 37 (Brill, 1996), 154-56monograph
  • B. K. Waltke and M. O'Connor, An Introduction to Biblical Hebrew Syntax (Eisenbrauns, 1990), sec. 26.2fgrammar
  • GKC (Gesenius-Kautzsch-Cowley), Hebrew Grammar, 2nd Eng. ed. (Clarendon, 1910), sec. 54cgrammar
  • W. Leslau, Comparative Dictionary of Ge'ez (Harrassowitz, 1987), 170lexicon

All attested forms of פָּתַל

hithpael imperfect 2ms

תִּתַּפָּל, תִּתְפַּתָּל

2Sa 22:27, Psa 18:26

niphal participle m p absolute

נִפְתָּלִים

Job 5:13

niphal participle m s absolute

נִפְתָּל

Pro 8:8

niphal perfect 1cs

נִפְתַּלְתִּי

Gen 30:8