StrongerBible

pishon

פִּישׁוֹן

HebrewH6376Proper NounPishon

Appears 1 time · tap a cell to see the verses

Gen 2:11
Root family
Word studyResearch-gradepee-SHOHNnoun

What pishon means

Pishon: the name of the first river flowing out of Eden, the one said to wind around the whole land of Havilah, where the gold is.

TranslatabilityApproximateCertaintyContested

Pishon is the first of the four rivers that branch off from the single stream watering Eden. The word appears in the Bible exactly once, and it turns up in no other ancient record either, which leaves a reader almost nothing to work from besides the name itself and the sentence around it.

The name looks built from a rare Hebrew verb (פּוּשׁ) used of stalled calves kicking and springing about once they are let loose. On that reading Pishon means something like "the Leaper" or "the Gusher," a name that says what the water does rather than where it runs. The best support for it is the company the name keeps: the second river of Eden, Gihon (גִּיחוֹן), is built the same way on a verb meaning to burst out, so the two unknown rivers would form a matched pair of descriptions. Even so, the standard Hebrew lexicons will not commit to it, and one of them calls the derivation "dubious."

Instead of placing the river, the text says what it wraps around: the whole land of Havilah (חֲוִילָה), where there is good gold, along with a fragrant resin and a precious stone. Those treasures have sent readers hunting in every direction for two thousand years:

  • An old Jewish tradition read it as the Nile, tying the name to the word for flax and to Egypt's flooded fields.
  • Josephus made it the Ganges, while later scholars preferred the Indus, which does curl around India's western side.
  • Others look closer to Mesopotamia, to the Kerkha or the Karun in western Iran, on the argument that the four rivers meet near the head of the Persian Gulf rather than spreading out from a northern source.
  • A widely publicized modern proposal traces a now dry riverbed running from the gold country of western Arabia down to that same gulf.

None of these can be shown from the text, and every one of them has been answered. Many scholars conclude that the passage was never meant as a map. Two of Eden's four rivers, the Tigris (חִדֶּקֶל) and the Euphrates (פְּרָת), are waters anyone in the ancient world could point to; the other two are not, and that mixture of the familiar and the unplaceable may well be the point. On this reading the four streams show one source inside God's garden feeding the far edges of the world, and the gold and the precious stone are the same materials the Bible later assigns to the tabernacle, marking the garden as holy ground.

Gen 2:11

Disputed

Which river, if any, the Pishon of Genesis 2:11 names. The name is unattested outside this verse, so every proposal is argued from the land of Havilah and its gold rather than from the name itself.

  • majorityThe four rivers of Eden are not a route that can be traced. They portray the garden as the source of the waters that reach the whole world, so no waterway should be matched with the Pishon.; Claus Westermann, Genesis 1-11: A Commentary, Continental Commentary (Minneapolis: Augsburg, 1984); Gordon J. Wenham, Genesis 1-15, Word Biblical Commentary 1 (Waco: Word, 1987); Terje Stordalen, Echoes of Eden: Genesis 2-3 and Symbolism of the Eden Garden in Biblical Hebrew Literature (Leuven: Peeters, 2000)
  • minorityA real river near the head of the Persian Gulf, most plausibly a now dry channel draining the gold-bearing hills of western Arabia, with Havilah in Arabia.; E. A. Speiser, "The Rivers of Paradise," in I Studied Inscriptions from Before the Flood, ed. R. S. Hess and D. T. Tsumura (Winona Lake: Eisenbrauns, 1994), 175-182; James A. Sauer, "The River Runs Dry: Creation Story Preserves Historical Memory," Biblical Archaeology Review 22, no. 4 (1996): 52-57, 64; Walter W. Müller, "Pishon," in The Anchor Bible Dictionary, ed. David Noel Freedman (New York: Doubleday, 1992), 5:374
  • minorityA great river far from Mesopotamia: the Ganges, the Indus, or the Nile.; Josephus, Jewish Antiquities 1.1.3 (1.38); Wilhelm Gesenius, Thesaurus Philologicus Criticus Linguae Hebraeae et Chaldaeae Veteris Testamenti (Leipzig: Vogel, 1829-1858), s.v. פושׁ

How much weight the derivation of the name from the verb פוּשׁ, "spring about, gush," can carry.

  • majorityIt is the best available Hebrew etymology but remains unproven, so the meaning of the name should be left open.; Brown, Driver, and Briggs, A Hebrew and English Lexicon of the Old Testament, s.v. פּוּשׁ, פִּישׁוֹן; Ludwig Koehler and Walter Baumgartner, The Hebrew and Aramaic Lexicon of the Old Testament, s.v. פִּישׁוֹן; David J. A. Clines, ed., The Dictionary of Classical Hebrew (Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1993-2011), s.v. פִּישׁוֹן
  • minorityThe derivation is sound and the name means the overflowing or poured-out water, supported by the parallel formation of Gihon on a verb meaning to burst forth.; Wilhelm Gesenius, Thesaurus Philologicus Criticus Linguae Hebraeae et Chaldaeae Veteris Testamenti (Leipzig: Vogel, 1829-1858), s.v. פושׁ

What scholars say about pishon

פִּישׁוֹן is a hapax legomenon, attested only at Genesis 2:11. Morphologically the ־וֹן afformative is the ordinary nominal and toponymic ending seen in גִּיחוֹן, חֶשְׁבּוֹן and אַיָּלוֹן (GKC §85, §85v); the diminutive function GKC §86g allows for אִישׁוֹן is expressly disputed by Barth and is not in view here, and Aharoni classes such endings among the droppable sufformatives of place names, changeable without altering the geographic reference. The traditional derivation takes the name from פוּשׁ I, "spring about, gambol," attested of stalled calves at Malachi 3:20 (English 4:2) and Jeremiah 50:11 (Qere), yielding "the Leaper, the Springer, the Gusher." BDB discounts the two further supposed attestations of the root, proposing with Nowack that Habakkuk 1:8 וּפָשׁוּ be struck as a dittography and that Nahum 3:18 נָפֹשׁוּ be emended to נָפֹצוּ, and its entry on the name reads "proper name of a river ... but dubious." Gesenius glossed the name as water poured forth and filed it under פושׁ; the "dispersive" of Strong's Concordance is a derivative of that tradition rather than an independent judgment. HALOT and DCH treat the derivation as uncertain. The strongest internal argument remains the parallel with גִּיחוֹן, transparently from גִּיחַ, "burst forth." Non-Semitic proposals (Sanskrit Sindhu, an Egyptian pA-Shen "the ocean," Iranian Uizhun via Walker and Rohl) have no standing in the reference literature; the last requires an ad hoc sound change.

Geographically the crux is the asymmetry of Genesis 2:10-14. חִדֶּקֶל and פְּרָת are securely identified through Akkadian Idiqlat (Sumerian Idigna) and Purattu, whereas פִּישׁוֹן and גִּיחוֹן are unattested as hydronyms anywhere else in the Bible or in the wider ancient Near Eastern record. Speiser's philological argument that רָאשִׁים in verse 10 denotes upstream headwaters seen from the mouth rather than downstream branches, on the analogy of Akkadian rēš for the upper course against Hebrew קָצֶה for the lower, relocated the discussion to the head of the Persian Gulf and underlies most modern Mesopotamian identifications, though Speiser himself remained tentative about the Pishon and doubted that any present wadi had been a perennial river in the relevant period. The commodities of Havilah (gold, בְּדֹלַח, אֶבֶן הַשֹּׁהַם) drive the Arabian reading: Müller localizes Havilah with the southwest Arabian Khaulān and suggests that "Pishon" may conflate the names of the Wadi Baysh and the Wadi Bishah, Arabic b corresponding to Hebrew p; Sauer, drawing on El-Baz's radar imagery, and Zarins independently identified the Pishon with the fossil Wadi al-Rummah and Wadi al-Batin system draining the gold-bearing Hijaz toward the Gulf. These are geological hypotheses rather than philological demonstrations, and the identification of בְּדֹלַח (aromatic gum resin, or pearl) and of אֶבֶן הַשֹּׁהַם (onyx, carnelian, lapis lazuli, malachite) is itself unsettled, which compounds the uncertainty of any commodity-based argument. The older identifications with the Nile (Rashi and Genesis Rabbah, with the wordplay on פִּשְׁתָּן, "flax"), the Ganges (Josephus, Antiquities 1.38) and the Indus (Gesenius) survive chiefly as reception history.

Against all locative readings stands a substantial body of work treating Genesis 2:10-14 as sacred space rather than cartography. Westermann judged that the difficulty of identification could indicate that the passage speaks symbolically, and that the notice of gold, bdellium and onyx serves to mark the world outside the garden which humans could reach by following the river. Stordalen reads Eden as archetypal sacred space with echoes across the Hebrew Bible; Wenham aligns the garden with the sanctuary, noting that its river, gold and onyx are the materials of the tabernacle and the priestly vestments in Exodus 25, and connects the stream with Ezekiel 47 and Revelation 22. Walton, Mettinger, Hendel and Tigay similarly foreground the Mesopotamian cosmological background, the sweet-water abzu and the Dilmun traditions. Most of these scholars nonetheless grant that real rivers and real-sounding names root the garden at the edge of the known world. In the versions and reception, the Septuagint has Φισών and the Vulgate Phison; Targum Onqelos transliterates while Targum Pseudo-Jonathan renders Havilah as Hindiki; Sirach 24:25 uses the Pishon as an image of the Torah's overflowing wisdom; and the pairing of Pishon with the Ganges and Gihon with the Nile became standard through Ambrose, Jerome and Epiphanius.

In-depth research

This is a research paper, so it may be hard to read without scholarly background. It is useful if you want to dig even deeper into this word.

Sources

  • Brown, Driver, and Briggs, A Hebrew and English Lexicon of the Old Testament, s.v. פּוּשׁ, פִּישׁוֹןlexicon
  • Ludwig Koehler and Walter Baumgartner, The Hebrew and Aramaic Lexicon of the Old Testament, s.v. פִּישׁוֹןlexicon
  • David J. A. Clines, ed., The Dictionary of Classical Hebrew (Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1993-2011), s.v. פִּישׁוֹןlexicon
  • Wilhelm Gesenius, Thesaurus Philologicus Criticus Linguae Hebraeae et Chaldaeae Veteris Testamenti (Leipzig: Vogel, 1829-1858), s.v. פושׁlexicon
  • Wilhelm Gesenius, Gesenius' Hebrew Grammar, ed. E. Kautzsch, rev. A. E. Cowley, 2nd English ed. (Oxford: Clarendon, 1910), §85, §86ggrammar
  • Yohanan Aharoni, The Land of the Bible: A Historical Geography, rev. ed., trans. A. F. Rainey (Philadelphia: Westminster, 1979)monograph
  • E. A. Speiser, "The Rivers of Paradise," in I Studied Inscriptions from Before the Flood, ed. R. S. Hess and D. T. Tsumura (Winona Lake: Eisenbrauns, 1994), 175-182article
  • E. A. Speiser, Genesis, Anchor Bible 1 (Garden City: Doubleday, 1964)commentary
  • Walter W. Müller, "Pishon," in The Anchor Bible Dictionary, ed. David Noel Freedman (New York: Doubleday, 1992), 5:374reference-work
  • Walter W. Müller, "Havilah," in The Anchor Bible Dictionary, ed. David Noel Freedman (New York: Doubleday, 1992), 3:81-82reference-work
  • James A. Sauer, "The River Runs Dry: Creation Story Preserves Historical Memory," Biblical Archaeology Review 22, no. 4 (1996): 52-57, 64article
  • Claus Westermann, Genesis 1-11: A Commentary, Continental Commentary (Minneapolis: Augsburg, 1984)commentary
  • Gordon J. Wenham, Genesis 1-15, Word Biblical Commentary 1 (Waco: Word, 1987)commentary
  • Terje Stordalen, Echoes of Eden: Genesis 2-3 and Symbolism of the Eden Garden in Biblical Hebrew Literature (Leuven: Peeters, 2000)monograph
  • Nahum M. Sarna, Genesis, JPS Torah Commentary (Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society, 1989)commentary
  • Umberto Cassuto, A Commentary on the Book of Genesis, Part One: From Adam to Noah, trans. Israel Abrahams (Jerusalem: Magnes, 1961)commentary
  • John H. Walton, Genesis, NIV Application Commentary (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2001)commentary
  • Josephus, Jewish Antiquities 1.1.3 (1.38)primary-source

All attested forms of פִּישׁוֹן

noun

פִּישׁוֹן

Gen 2:11