StrongerBible

azazel

עֲזָאזֵל

HebrewH5799Proper Nounscapegoat, Azazel

Appears 4 times · tap a cell to see the verses

Lev 16:8Lev 16:10 (2×)Lev 16:26
Compound of
Word studyResearch-gradeah-zah-ZALEnoun

What azazel means

Azazel: the mysterious wilderness destination or being to whom the second goat of the Day of Atonement was sent away carrying Israel's sins.

TranslatabilityUntranslatableCertaintyContested

This word appears only in the instructions for the Day of Atonement in Leviticus 16, where the high priest casts lots over two goats. One lot is marked "for the LORD," and that goat is offered in sacrifice. The other lot is marked "for Azazel," and that goat is not killed: after the people's sins are confessed over its head, it is driven out alive into the desert. Because the two lots are set side by side in exactly the same way, one for the LORD and one for Azazel, the word almost certainly names a real counterpart on the other side of the ritual, not just a purpose or a thing.

What that counterpart is has been argued for two thousand years, and there is no settled answer. Most scholars today take Azazel as the name of a wilderness power, a demon or hostile spirit of the desert waste to whom the sin-laden goat is dispatched (though never sacrificed). An older Jewish tradition read it as a place, a rugged desert cliff off which the goat was later thrown. And the tradition behind the familiar English word "scapegoat" broke it into "the goat that goes away," reading it as removal rather than a name. The three readings sit behind the different translations you will see, and the strongest current view is the first.

Whatever the name meant at its root, the point of the ritual in Leviticus is clear and controlled: the goat is sent away, not offered up. Both goats first stand before the LORD, and only one is given over to be sacrificed. The other simply carries the year's guilt out of the camp and into empty land, so that the sin is removed from the people rather than handed over as a gift. The very next chapter forbids Israel to sacrifice to the goat-demons of the open country, which is part of why many read the sending-away here as deliberately kept separate from worship.

Lev 16:8Lev 16:10 (2×)Lev 16:26

Disputed

What or whom the word denotes: a wilderness demon or divine being, a place, an abstract sense of removal, or something else.

  • majorityA supernatural being: the name of a wilderness demon or chthonic divine power to whom the sin-laden goat is dispatched (though not offered), most likely from an older form meaning something like "El is fierce." This is the majority position in critical scholarship since roughly 1980, resting above all on the parallel wording of the two lots, one for the LORD and one for Azazel, which requires Azazel to be a comparable personal recipient.; Bernd Janowski, "Azazel," in Dictionary of Deities and Demons in the Bible, 2nd ed. (1999), 128-131; Jacob Milgrom, Leviticus 1-16, Anchor Bible 3 (1991), 1020-1021, 1071-1079; David P. Wright, "Azazel," in Anchor Bible Dictionary 1 (1992), 536-537; Hayim Tawil, "Azazel the Prince of the Steppe: A Comparative Study," ZAW 92 (1980), 43-59
  • minorityA place name: a rugged desert cliff or hard mountain, the destination to which the goat was led. Dominant in Jewish exegesis from the Talmud through the Middle Ages and given a philological defense in modern scholarship by taking the final letter as a word-forming ending on a root meaning "rough, strong."; b. Yoma 67b; Rashi on Leviticus 16:8; G. R. Driver, "Three Technical Terms in the Pentateuch," Journal of Semitic Studies 1 (1956), 97-98; Baruch A. Levine, Leviticus / Va-yikra, JPS Torah Commentary (1989), Excursus 4
  • minorityAn abstract term for removal, parsed as "the goat that goes away" or "entire removal." This is the analysis behind the ancient versions and the English word "scapegoat," but its grammar is widely judged untenable, since it rests on an unattested root and mixes Hebrew and Aramaic elements.; Wilhelm Gesenius, Hebrew-Chaldee Lexicon to the Old Testament, trans. Tregelles, 617; Brown-Driver-Briggs, s.v. עזאזל, 736

What scholars say about azazel

The term occurs only at Leviticus 16:8, 10, 26 and is among the most contested words in the Hebrew Bible. Modern discussion organizes the options into four families (Levine, Pinker): a wilderness demon or divine being; a place name (a rugged cliff); an abstract noun for removal ("the goat that departs"); and various minority proposals. The majority view since Tawil (1980) and Milgrom (1991) is that עזאזל names a supernatural recipient, decisive support being the syntactic parallel of the two lots (לַיהוָה // לַעֲזָאזֵל), which requires a personal referent of the same order as YHWH. The most productive etymology treats the form as theophoric on the pattern of the personal name עֲזַזְיָהוּ, with the older spelling עזזאל attested at Qumran (4Q180; 11QTemple 26:13), in the Samaritan Pentateuch, and in the Peshitta; the Masoretic spelling is widely read as a secondary metathesis. Milgrom argues the priestly writer retained the name while stripping its demonic personality, so the goat is a disposal vehicle aimed at Azazel's territory rather than an offering to him, congruent with the polemic against שְׂעִירִים (goat-demon) worship in Leviticus 17:7. The place reading (Driver; b. Yoma 67b) and the removal etymology (Gesenius, BDB) are both defended but face internal objections (Leviticus 16:22 already names the destination אֶרֶץ גְּזֵרָה; the removal etymology rests on an unattested root). The ritual has close Hittite analogues (the elimination rites of Ašḫella and Ambazzi; the nakkušši substitute animals) analyzed by Wright and Feder, and an Eblaite antecedent (Zatelli). The Septuagint avoided naming a demon, rendering it with the apotropaic ἀποπομπαῖος ("the one who carries away") and later εἰς ἄφεσιν ("for release"), whence the Vulgate's caper emissarius and Tyndale's "scapegoat." The Second Temple and rabbinic afterlife (1 Enoch 10; 4Q180; b. Yoma 67b; Pseudo-Jonathan; Nachmanides) alternately demonizes and euphemizes the figure. Open questions remain over whether Azazel was a true deity or a demon (Tawil vs. Janowski/Milgrom; Frey-Anthes doubts "demon" is even apt for early Israel) and whether the Enochic demonization recovers an old substratum or is a post-exilic development (Milgrom/Wright vs. Janowski/Wilhelm).

In-depth research

This is a research paper, so it may be hard to read without scholarly background. It is useful if you want to dig even deeper into this word.

Sources

  • Jacob Milgrom, Leviticus 1-16, Anchor Bible 3 (1991), 1020-1021, 1071-1079commentary
  • Bernd Janowski, "Azazel," in Dictionary of Deities and Demons in the Bible, 2nd ed. (1999), 128-131dictionary
  • David P. Wright, "Azazel," in Anchor Bible Dictionary 1 (1992), 536-537dictionary
  • David P. Wright, The Disposal of Impurity, SBL Dissertation Series 101 (1987), 15-74monograph
  • Hayim Tawil, "Azazel the Prince of the Steppe: A Comparative Study," ZAW 92 (1980), 43-59article
  • Baruch A. Levine, Leviticus / Va-yikra, JPS Torah Commentary (1989), Excursus 4commentary
  • John E. Hartley, Leviticus, WBC 4 (1992), 220-238commentary
  • Roy E. Gane, Cult and Character (2005)monograph
  • Aron Pinker, "A Goat to Go to Azazel," Journal of Hebrew Scriptures 7, art. 8 (2007), 1-24article
  • G. R. Driver, "Three Technical Terms in the Pentateuch," Journal of Semitic Studies 1 (1956), 97-98article
  • Bernd Janowski and Gernot Wilhelm, "Der Bock, der die Sunden hinaustragt," in Religionsgeschichtliche Beziehungen, OBO 129 (1993), 109-169article
  • Ida Zatelli, "The Origin of the Biblical Scapegoat Ritual: The Evidence of Two Eblaite Texts," Vetus Testamentum 48 (1998), 254-263article
  • Yitzhaq Feder, Blood Expiation in Hittite and Biblical Ritual, WAW Supplement 2 (2011)monograph
  • Anna Angelini, L'imaginaire du demoniaque dans la Septante (2021), 94-100monograph
  • Daniel Stokl Ben Ezra, The Impact of Yom Kippur on Early Christianity, WUNT 163 (2003), 102-106, 165-171monograph
  • George W. E. Nickelsburg, 1 Enoch 1, Hermeneia (2001)commentary
  • Lester L. Grabbe, "The Scapegoat Tradition," Journal for the Study of Judaism 18 (1987), 152-167article
  • Andrei A. Orlov, Dark Mirrors: Azazel and Satanael in Early Jewish Demonology (2011)monograph
  • Wilhelm Gesenius, Hebrew-Chaldee Lexicon to the Old Testament, trans. Tregelles, 617lexicon
  • Brown-Driver-Briggs, s.v. עזאזל, 736lexicon

All attested forms of עֲזָאזֵל

noun

עֲזָאזֵל

Lev 16:8, Lev 16:10, Lev 16:10, Lev 16:26