StrongerBible

sanver

סַנְוֵרִים

HebrewH5575blindness, blinding light

Appears 3 times · tap a cell to see the verses

Gen 19:112Ki 6:18 (2×)
Word studyResearch-gradesan-veh-REEMnoun

What sanver means

a sudden dazzling sent by God that leaves people unable to make sense of what is in front of them

TranslatabilityPartialCertaintyContested

This rare word turns up in only two stories, and both are the same kind of scene: a hostile group closes in, and God disables them on the spot. The men crowding Lot's door at Sodom are struck so that they wear themselves out groping for the entrance, and the Aramean troops sent to seize Elisha are struck so that the prophet can walk them straight into the middle of Samaria.

English Bibles almost always say "blindness," but three things point somewhere slightly different:

  • Hebrew already had an ordinary word for blindness (עִוָּרוֹן), so reaching for a rare word instead marks this out as something else.
  • The people struck can still stand, walk, follow, and grope about, which is not how a crowd behaves when it has just lost its sight altogether.
  • The word looks to be built from a word for shining, naming the blaze of light rather than the darkness that follows it.

Most scholars now read it as dazzled, disoriented misperception: the eyes still work, but nothing they take in can be placed. The medieval commentator Rashi said as much long before anyone could check it against Akkadian, describing an affliction in which a person "sees but does not know what he is seeing." The oldest Greek translation of these two verses reaches for an unusual term it otherwise saves for a curse of madness and confusion, and the old Aramaic versions use a word for a sudden darkening of the eyes with dizziness.

The two scenes it links pull in opposite directions. At Sodom the dazzling shuts down an assault and opens the way for the city's ruin the next morning. At Samaria it disarms an army without a blow, and the captives are fed and sent home. The same flash of divine light ends one story in fire and the other in a shared meal.

Gen 19:112Ki 6:18 (2×)

Disputed

Whether the word denotes ordinary blindness that comes on suddenly, or a dazzling that disorients perception without removing sight.

  • majorityThe word is specialized: it names a radiant, disorienting flash, so those struck misperceive rather than lose their sight. Both narratives require it, since the afflicted still move about and are led.; HALOT, s.v. סַנְוֵרִים ("dazzling, deception"); E. A. Speiser, Genesis (Anchor Bible 1), pp. 138-143; Mordechai Cogan and Hayim Tadmor, II Kings (Anchor Bible 11), p. 74; Nahum M. Sarna, Genesis (JPS Torah Commentary); Gordon J. Wenham, Genesis 16-50 (WBC 2); Robert L. Cohn, 2 Kings (Berit Olam)
  • minorityThe word simply means sudden blindness, miraculously inflicted; its unusual form and rarity do not require a distinct sense beyond that.; BDB, s.v. סַנְוֵרִים ("sudden blindness"); David J. A. Clines (ed.), The Dictionary of Classical Hebrew, s.v. סַנְוֵרִים

What scholars say about sanver

The noun occurs three times (Gen 19:11; 2 Kgs 6:18 twice, in both petition and fulfillment), always plural. BDB (1906) treats the plural as intensive or abstract with Stade (Grammatik §324b), the same pattern as זְקֻנִים and נְעוּרִים, glosses "sudden blindness," observes that all cases are miraculous and that in Kings the affliction is temporary, and pronounces the etymology dubious, rejecting the derivations of Halévy (REJ 11 [1885]: 66), Hoffmann (ZAW 2 [1882]: 68), and Wetzstein (in Delitzsch, Psalms) and settling for an assumed quadriliteral root. The modern turning point is E. A. Speiser's 1952 study of the elative in West Semitic and Akkadian (JCS 6: 81-92), which explained the samekh preformative as reflecting the Akkadian Š-stem verbal noun šunwurum, from nawārum/namārum "to shine, be bright" (CAD N/1; AHw), so that the noun names the radiant cause and not the visual effect; Speiser rendered Gen 19:11 with "blinding light" in Anchor Bible Genesis (1964), pp. 138-143. Cogan and Tadmor extended the derivation to 2 Kgs 6:18 in Anchor Bible II Kings (1988), p. 74, and Tawil systematized it in An Akkadian Lexical Companion for Biblical Hebrew (2009). Orlinsky's Notes on the New Translation of the Torah (JPS, 1969) carried it into the JPS Tanakh, and the New American Bible follows suit. HALOT accepts the semantics ("dazzling, deception") but analyzes the form as an internal Hebrew Šafʿel or Siphʿel from √נור used euphemistically; Klein's Comprehensive Etymological Dictionary sets the two analyses side by side, noting that both are euphemistic and differ only over borrowing versus independent coinage. The proposed link to Akkadian sillurmâ/sinlurmâ "night blindness" (Landsberger; Marten Stol, "Blindness and Night-Blindness in Akkadian," JNES 45 [1986]: 295-299) is generally rejected, since both biblical scenes occur in daylight. DCH retains the plain gloss "blindness, sudden blindness"; TDOT and TLOT have no dedicated article, subsuming the word under עור. The ancient versions divide sharply: LXX uses the marked ἀορασία at both loci, a term it otherwise employs in the Greek Old Testament only at Deut 28:28 in a triad with παραπληξία and ἔκστασις διανοίας, and Targum Onkelos (Gen 19:11) and Targum Jonathan (2 Kgs 6:18) use שברירי, glossed in Castellus as scotomata with vertigo and known in b. Pesahim 112a and b. Avodah Zarah 12b as a demon of night blindness, whereas the Peshitta (ʿawīrūtā) and Vulgate (caecitas) flatten the term to ordinary blindness. Jewish exegesis anticipated the philology: Rashi glosses "an illness of stupefaction: he sees but does not know what he sees," Ibn Ezra speaks of a darkening of eye and mind, Ralbag reasons from the narrative that the Arameans retained partial sight, and Malbim insists the word denotes distorted vision distinct from עִוָּרוֹן. On the literary plane the intertextual dependence of 2 Kgs 6 on Gen 19 is widely recognized (already Ewald), with Cohn (Berit Olam) reading 2 Kgs 6:17-20 as an ironic triad of opened, struck, and reopened eyes that inverts the Sodom paradigm.

Where scholars disagree about sanver

Whether the word is a loan from Akkadian or an internal Hebrew coinage, both from a root meaning "to shine."

  • majorityIt is borrowed from the Akkadian causative verbal noun šunwurum, "to make radiant," the sibilant prefix reflecting the Akkadian pattern; the noun therefore names the blaze of light rather than the loss of sight.; E. A. Speiser, "The 'Elative' in West-Semitic and Akkadian," Journal of Cuneiform Studies 6 (1952): 81-92; Mordechai Cogan and Hayim Tadmor, II Kings (Anchor Bible 11), p. 74; Hayim Tawil, An Akkadian Lexical Companion for Biblical Hebrew (Ktav, 2009)
  • minorityIt is a rare Hebrew formation from the native root for shining, used as a polite substitute for naming blindness directly, with no borrowing required.; HALOT, s.v. סַנְוֵרִים; Ernest Klein, A Comprehensive Etymological Dictionary of the Hebrew Language for Readers of English, s.v. סנורים
In-depth research

This is a research paper, so it may be hard to read without scholarly background. It is useful if you want to dig even deeper into this word.

Sources

  • BDB, s.v. סַנְוֵרִיםlexicon
  • HALOT, s.v. סַנְוֵרִיםlexicon
  • David J. A. Clines (ed.), The Dictionary of Classical Hebrew, s.v. סַנְוֵרִיםlexicon
  • Ernest Klein, A Comprehensive Etymological Dictionary of the Hebrew Language for Readers of English, s.v. סנוריםdictionary
  • E. A. Speiser, "The 'Elative' in West-Semitic and Akkadian," Journal of Cuneiform Studies 6 (1952): 81-92article
  • E. A. Speiser, Genesis (Anchor Bible 1), pp. 138-143commentary
  • Mordechai Cogan and Hayim Tadmor, II Kings (Anchor Bible 11), p. 74commentary
  • Hayim Tawil, An Akkadian Lexical Companion for Biblical Hebrew (Ktav, 2009)reference-work
  • Marten Stol, "Blindness and Night-Blindness in Akkadian," Journal of Near Eastern Studies 45 (1986): 295-299article
  • Harry M. Orlinsky, Notes on the New Translation of the Torah (JPS, 1969), pp. 93ff.monograph
  • Nahum M. Sarna, Genesis (JPS Torah Commentary)commentary
  • Gordon J. Wenham, Genesis 16-50 (WBC 2)commentary
  • Victor P. Hamilton, The Book of Genesis, Chapters 18-50 (NICOT)commentary
  • Kenneth A. Mathews, Genesis 11:27-50:26 (NAC 1B)commentary
  • Claus Westermann, Genesis 12-36 (Continental Commentary)commentary
  • Robert L. Cohn, 2 Kings (Berit Olam)commentary
  • T. R. Hobbs, 2 Kings (WBC 13)commentary
  • Marvin A. Sweeney, I and II Kings (Old Testament Library)commentary
  • Burke O. Long, 2 Kings (FOTL 10)commentary
  • Bernhard Stade, Lehrbuch der hebräischen Grammatik, §324bgrammar

All attested forms of סַנְוֵרִים

m p absolute

סַּנְוֵרִים

Gen 19:11, 2Ki 6:18, 2Ki 6:18