manna, the bread-like food God supplied for Israel to eat in the wilderness
This word names one specific thing: the flaky, seed-sized substance that appeared on the ground with the dew each morning during Israel's years in the wilderness. Exodus describes it as fine and white, like coriander seed, tasting like wafers made with honey; Numbers describes it as pale and resin-like, tasting like a rich cake made with oil. It could be gathered, ground, boiled, and baked into bread. It fell six days a week, doubled on the sixth day so none had to be gathered on the Sabbath, and a jar of it was kept as a lasting reminder in front of the covenant chest. It stopped completely the day Israel first ate food grown in the promised land.
Later writers keep returning to manna as proof of God's care and as a teaching tool. Deuteronomy says God let the people go hungry and then fed them with manna to teach them that a person does not live on bread alone but on every word that comes from God. Psalm 78 and Psalm 105 retell the story in celebratory, almost cosmic language, picturing God opening the doors of heaven to rain it down. Nehemiah's long prayer of confession lists the manna, never withheld through forty years, as one more example of God's persistent kindness toward a people who kept turning away.
Because it was tied so closely to this one story, many scholars think the word is connected to a real substance still known in the region: a sweet, sticky residue that certain insects leave on tamarisk trees in the Sinai peninsula, which local people have long called by a very similar name and still gather and eat. Whether or not that natural substance stands behind the story, the biblical picture goes well beyond it, describing something that appeared daily for decades, in far greater quantity, on a fixed and controllable schedule tied to the Sabbath. Later Jewish and Christian writers develop the word even further, calling it the bread of angels or the food of heaven, and the Gospel of John and the book of Revelation use it as a picture of Jesus and of end-time promise. None of that theological weight, though, changes what the Hebrew word itself simply names: a particular food God gave.
Disputed
Whether the manna of the wilderness narratives is best explained as a retelling of a known natural substance, or as something the text presents as beyond any natural process.
- majorityThe story as told cannot be fully explained by any known natural substance. Details such as the double portion gathered before the Sabbath, the total cessation of the supply the moment Israel entered the land, and the sheer scale needed to feed a whole people for decades go beyond what any natural phenomenon could supply.; Nahum M. Sarna, Exodus, JPS Torah Commentary (1991); Brevard S. Childs, The Book of Exodus: A Critical, Theological Commentary, OTL (1974); Thomas B. Dozeman, Commentary on Exodus, ECC (2009)
- minorityThe story has a real natural substance behind it: the sweet honeydew that certain insects leave on Sinai tamarisk trees, which desert dwellers in the region still gather, eat, and call by a closely related name.; F. S. Bodenheimer, "The Manna of Sinai," Biblical Archaeologist 10/1 (1947); James K. Hoffmeier, Ancient Israel in Sinai: The Evidence for the Authenticity of the Wilderness Tradition (2005); Carol Meyers, Exodus, NCBC (2005)