StrongerBible

dardar

דַּרְדַּר

HebrewH1863thistle

Appears 2 times · tap a cell to see the verses

Gen 3:18Hos 10:8
Word studyResearch-gradedar-DARnoun

What dardar means

thistle: a spiny weed that overruns worked ground, and so a standing sign of land under a curse

TranslatabilityApproximateCertaintyStrong

This word turns up only twice in the Hebrew Bible, and both times it is bolted to the word for thorn (קוֹץ) in one stock phrase, "thorn and thistle." Nothing else in the Bible pairs those two words. That makes the phrase work almost like a title: the second time it appears, it drags the first appearance along with it.

The plant behind it is almost certainly the star-thistle, the spiny weed that still takes over grain fields across Israel and Syria and still carries this same name in Palestinian Arabic. Words for "thistle" in Aramaic, Syriac, Arabic, and Ethiopic all match it, and the Hebrew word doubles its own syllable, a pattern Hebrew likes for plant names and one that makes the phrase sound as stubborn as the weed itself. A Standard Arabic word that looks identical but means "elm" is a lookalike borrowed from Persian, not a relative.

The two verses use the same weed to make two different points:

  • In Genesis 3:18 the thistles sprout out of the soil itself, the sign that the ground a man works has turned against him.
  • In Hosea 10:8 they climb over Israel's smashed altars, the sign that a place people called holy has been handed back to the wild.

When the Old Testament was translated into Greek, this word became a term for "caltrop" (τρίβολος), the name of the spiked iron device thrown on the ground to cripple horses. That Greek pair, "thorns and thistles," is what the New Testament picks up when Hebrews 6:8 calls fruitless ground close to a curse, and when Jesus asks whether anyone gathers figs from thistles.

Gen 3:18Hos 10:8
Hos 10:8

Whether the phrase in Hosea 10:8 is a deliberate quotation of Genesis 3:18 or a use of shared curse language.

  • contestedA self-conscious echo of Genesis 3:18, part of Hosea's wider reversal-of-creation motif, since no other biblical text pairs these two words and Hosea applies the image to cultic rather than agricultural ground.; J. Andrew Dearman, The Book of Hosea (NICOT; Eerdmans, 2010), 267-268; Duane A. Garrett, Hosea, Joel (NAC 19B; B&H, 1997); Ehud Ben Zvi, Hosea (FOTL XXIA/1; Eerdmans, 2005); Michael DeRoche, "The Reversal of Creation in Hosea," Vetus Testamentum 31 (1981): 400-409
  • contestedThe phrase belongs to a broad stock of desolation and covenant-curse vocabulary, so the shared wording shows familiarity with the primeval history at most, not a formal citation.; Hans Walter Wolff, Hosea (Hermeneia; Fortress, 1974); James Luther Mays, Hosea: A Commentary (OTL; Westminster, 1969); Douglas Stuart, Hosea-Jonah (WBC 31; Word, 1987), 162-164; A. A. Macintosh, A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on Hosea (ICC; T&T Clark, 1997), 391; Francis I. Andersen and David Noel Freedman, Hosea (Anchor Bible 24; Doubleday, 1980), 202, 269, 355-358

Disputed

Which plant the word names.

  • majorityThe star-thistles of the genus Centaurea, the conspicuous winter and spring weeds of Levantine grain fields, with Centaurea iberica and Centaurea calcitrapa the leading candidates.; Michael Zohary, Plants of the Bible (Cambridge University Press, 1982), 153-160; Jehuda Feliks, "Thistles and Thorns," Encyclopaedia Judaica, 2nd ed. (2007); Harold N. and Alma L. Moldenke, Plants of the Bible (Chronica Botanica, 1952); F. Nigel Hepper, Illustrated Encyclopedia of Bible Plants (IVP, 1992); Lytton John Musselman, A Dictionary of Bible Plants (Cambridge University Press, 2012)
  • minorityAn edible spiny plant, the wild cardoon or artichoke (Cynara syriaca), on the reasoning that Adam is condemned to eat these plants, so the curse lies in the painful labor of getting food from thorny growth rather than in inedibility.; Genesis Rabbah 20:10; Nahum M. Sarna, Genesis (JPS Torah Commentary; JPS, 1989), 29-30

What scholars say about dardar

BDB (p. 205) treats the word as a collective noun for thistles and a symbol of wildness and desert, citing the living Palestinian Arabic dardar and Loew's Aramaeische Pflanzennamen; HALOT glosses "thistle" and lists cognates in Jewish Aramaic, Syriac, Arabic and Ge'ez; DCH stays synchronic, noting only that the word is always paired with קוֹץ and always the subject of a verb of sprouting (Genesis 3:18, Hosea 10:8). Gesenius, in Tregelles's translation, derived it from a root דָּרַר "to flow, be abundant," an etymology later lexicons abandon as speculative. Neither TDOT nor NIDOTTE gives the word its own lemma; it is folded into the treatment of קוֹץ and a topical article on thorns. Morphologically the form is the full reduplication of a two-consonant base, a pattern productive for Semitic plant and animal names (Butts, JAOS 131 [2011]: 83-108). The most promising cognate is Akkadian daddaru, "a foetid plant, perhaps centaury" (CAD D, 18-19; von Soden, AHw I, 149), attested in a proverb in parallel with martu "gall" (Lambert, Babylonian Wisdom Literature, 244) and plausibly from an earlier *dardaru by the regular assimilation of rd to dd; Watson's survey of Ugaritic botanical vocabulary lists no cognate. On the plant itself, Zohary, Feliks, the Moldenkes, Hepper and Musselman converge on Centaurea star-thistles, with C. iberica and C. calcitrapa the leading candidates, against the rabbinic identification with an edible cardoon in Genesis Rabbah 20:10, which modern botanists read as theologically driven midrash rather than field observation. On Genesis 3:18, Wenham stresses that the ground and not the man is cursed and that the man's painful toil deliberately mirrors Eve's in childbearing; Cassuto notes that the same verb which produced Eden's trees in Genesis 2:9 now produces weeds; Mathews, Hamilton and Waltke develop the reversal-of-creation reading, while Westermann and Walton hold that the verse retrojects ordinary agricultural experience rather than announcing a new botanical order. On Hosea 10:8, Dearman, Garrett, Ben Zvi and DeRoche read a deliberate echo of Genesis 3:18; Andersen and Freedman treat de-creation as a broad theme; Wolff, Mays, Stuart and Macintosh decline to press quotation. The Septuagint renders the word τρίβολος in both verses, and that Greek pair (ἀκάνθας καὶ τριβόλους) is what Hebrews 6:8 and Matthew 7:16 take up, with Ellingworth and Attridge treating Genesis 3, Hosea 10 and Isaiah 5 as converging sources behind the Hebrews warning.

In-depth research

This is a research paper, so it may be hard to read without scholarly background. It is useful if you want to dig even deeper into this word.

Sources

  • BDB, A Hebrew and English Lexicon of the Old Testament (Oxford, 1906), 205, s.v. דַּרְדַּרlexicon
  • HALOT (Koehler, Baumgartner, Stamm; Brill, 1994-2000), s.v. דַּרְדַּרlexicon
  • DCH (David J. A. Clines, ed., Dictionary of Classical Hebrew, Sheffield), vol. 2, s.v. דַּרְדַּרlexicon
  • Wilhelm Gesenius, Hebrew and Chaldee Lexicon, tr. Samuel P. Tregelles (London, 1857), s.v. דַּרְדַּרlexicon
  • Chicago Assyrian Dictionary (CAD), vol. D (Oriental Institute), 18-19, s.v. daddarulexicon
  • Wolfram von Soden, Akkadisches Handwoerterbuch I (Harrassowitz), 149lexicon
  • W. G. Lambert, Babylonian Wisdom Literature (Clarendon, 1960), 244monograph
  • Immanuel Loew, Die Flora der Juden I (Vienna, 1926-28), 404-407monograph
  • Aaron Michael Butts, "Reduplicated Nominal Patterns in Semitic," Journal of the American Oriental Society 131 (2011): 83-108article
  • W. G. E. Watson, "A Botanical Snapshot of Ugarit," Aula Orientalis 22 (2004): 107-155article
  • Michael Zohary, Plants of the Bible (Cambridge University Press, 1982), 153-160monograph
  • Jehuda Feliks, "Thistles and Thorns," Encyclopaedia Judaica, 2nd ed. (2007)reference
  • Harold N. and Alma L. Moldenke, Plants of the Bible (Chronica Botanica, 1952)monograph
  • F. Nigel Hepper, Illustrated Encyclopedia of Bible Plants (IVP, 1992)monograph
  • Lytton John Musselman, A Dictionary of Bible Plants (Cambridge University Press, 2012)monograph
  • Nogah Hareuveni, Nature in Our Biblical Heritage, tr. Helen Frenkley (Neot Kedumim, 1980)monograph
  • Genesis Rabbah 20:10primary-source
  • Nahum M. Sarna, Genesis (JPS Torah Commentary; JPS, 1989), 29-30commentary
  • Gordon J. Wenham, Genesis 1-15 (WBC 1; Word, 1987), 82-83commentary
  • Umberto Cassuto, A Commentary on the Book of Genesis, Part I: From Adam to Noah (Magnes, 1961), 165-168commentary
  • Claus Westermann, Genesis 1-11: A Continental Commentary (Fortress, 1994), 263-267commentary
  • Kenneth A. Mathews, Genesis 1-11:26 (NAC 1A; B&H, 1996), 252-254commentary
  • Victor P. Hamilton, The Book of Genesis: Chapters 1-17 (NICOT; Eerdmans, 1990), 202-205commentary
  • Bruce K. Waltke with Cathi J. Fredricks, Genesis: A Commentary (Zondervan, 2001), 94-95commentary
  • E. A. Speiser, Genesis (Anchor Bible 1; Doubleday, 1964), 24, 27commentary
  • Bill T. Arnold, Genesis (New Cambridge Bible Commentary; Cambridge University Press, 2009), 71-72commentary
  • John H. Walton, The Lost World of Adam and Eve (IVP, 2015)monograph
  • J. Andrew Dearman, The Book of Hosea (NICOT; Eerdmans, 2010), 267-268commentary
  • Duane A. Garrett, Hosea, Joel (NAC 19B; B&H, 1997)commentary
  • Ehud Ben Zvi, Hosea (FOTL XXIA/1; Eerdmans, 2005)commentary
  • Michael DeRoche, "The Reversal of Creation in Hosea," Vetus Testamentum 31 (1981): 400-409article
  • Francis I. Andersen and David Noel Freedman, Hosea (Anchor Bible 24; Doubleday, 1980), 202, 269, 355-358commentary
  • Hans Walter Wolff, Hosea (Hermeneia; Fortress, 1974)commentary
  • James Luther Mays, Hosea: A Commentary (OTL; Westminster, 1969)commentary
  • Douglas Stuart, Hosea-Jonah (WBC 31; Word, 1987), 162-164commentary
  • A. A. Macintosh, A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on Hosea (ICC; T&T Clark, 1997), 391commentary
  • Paul Ellingworth, The Epistle to the Hebrews (NIGTC; Eerdmans, 1993), 314, 328commentary
  • Harold W. Attridge, Hebrews (Hermeneia; Fortress, 1989)commentary

All attested forms of דַּרְדַּר

m s absolute

דַרְדַּר

Gen 3:18, Hos 10:8