StrongerBible

boheret

בַּהֶרֶת

HebrewH0934bright spot, spot, ...

Appears 12 times · tap a cell to see the verses

Lev 13:2Lev 13:4Lev 13:19Lev 13:23Lev 13:24Lev 13:25Lev 13:26Lev 13:28Lev 13:38 (2×)Lev 13:39Lev 14:56
Root family
Word studyba-HEH-retnoun

What boheret means

a bright, shiny patch on the skin: one of the three marks a priest inspects when deciding whether a skin condition makes a person unclean

TranslatabilityPartialCertaintyStrong

Every one of this word's twelve appearances sits inside a single body of law: the instructions in Leviticus 13 and 14 telling a priest how to examine a suspicious mark on someone's skin. The name itself points to brightness. The patch is paler and shinier than the skin around it, which is why most English Bibles render it "bright spot".

It is one of three marks the law names at the start of the procedure, alongside a raised or swollen patch (שְׂאֵת) and a scaly eruption (סַפַּחַת). Of the three, this is the one the chapter works out in the most detail. It governs the opening case, the case of a healed boil, and the case of a burn.

A bright patch is a question, not a verdict. When the priest finds one, he looks for three specific things:

  • whether the hair growing in it has turned white
  • whether the patch looks sunk below the surrounding skin
  • whether it has spread during a week of waiting

Only those signs decide whether the person has the spreading condition the law declares unclean (צָרַעַת).

Often the answer is that all is well. A bright patch left where a boil or a burn has healed is simply scar tissue, and the priest pronounces the person clean. Bright patches scattered over the body that are dull rather than vivid are a harmless rash (בֹּהַק), and again the verdict is clean.

Lev 13:2Lev 13:4Lev 13:19Lev 13:23Lev 13:24Lev 13:25Lev 13:26Lev 13:28Lev 13:38 (2×)Lev 13:39Lev 14:56

Disputed

Whether the word names a bright, shiny patch specifically, or more generally a patch of discolored skin, and whether the three terms listed in Leviticus 13:2 describe appearances or name distinct conditions.

  • contestedA visible discoloration of the skin. On this reading the three terms of the list describe how a patch looks rather than naming separate diseases, since every criterion the priest applies is visual: whether hair within the patch has whitened, whether the patch appears deeper than the surrounding skin, and whether it has spread after quarantine.; Milgrom, Leviticus 1-16 (AB 3, 1991), pp. 773-76; Levine, Leviticus (JPS Torah Commentary, 1989), pp. 76-79
  • contestedA bright or shiny patch, retaining the note of brightness that the word's own derivation carries. The standard lexicons gloss it this way and most English versions follow them.; HALOT, vol. 1, s.v. בַּהֶרֶת; BDB, s.v. בַּהֶרֶת; Wenham, The Book of Leviticus (NICOT, 1979), pp. 194-201; Hartley, Leviticus (WBC 4, 1992), pp. 187-92

What scholars say about boheret

בַּהֶרֶת occurs 12 times, all within Leviticus 13-14, and the standard lexica derive it from an otherwise unattested root בהר "to shine, be bright," comparing Arabic bahira "to shine, dazzle" and the Hebrew hapax בֹּהַק (Lev 13:39): BDB, HALOT, DCH and Ges18 all gloss "bright spot, white patch (on the skin)." Morphologically it is a qattelet-type feminine noun, and the plural בֶּהָרֹת (Lev 13:38, 39) is the same lexeme, not a second entry. In the diagnostic triad of Lev 13:2 (שְׂאֵת, סַפַּחַת, בַּהֶרֶת), repeated as the summary formula at 14:56, בַּהֶרֶת is the term ch. 13 develops most fully: it governs the primary case (13:4-8) and both post-traumatic cases, the healed boil (13:18-23) and the burn (13:24-28), and it carries the benign ruling of 13:38-39. Milgrom (AB) renders it "shiny mark" or "discoloration" and argues from the applied criteria (whether the hair within has turned white, whether the lesion appears עָמֹק "deeper" than the skin at 13:3 or שָׁפָל "lower" at 13:20-21, whether it has spread after the seven-day quarantine) that the triad terms describe surface appearance rather than naming distinct pathologies; Levine (JPS) likewise renders "discoloration," while Wenham (NICOT) and Hartley (WBC) retain the traditional "bright spot." The singular-plural difference at 13:38-39 is not semantic: the patches there are diagnostically distinguished as כֵּהוֹת ("dull") and diffuse, which yields the verdict בֹּהַק and a declaration of cleanness. What the term denoted clinically is not recoverable; Hulse's survey of the medical vocabulary of these chapters concluded that the Levitical category is not Hansen's disease, and no differential diagnosis for בַּהֶרֶת can be established from the text. The later rabbinic system (Mishnah Nega'im 1:1) grades בַּהֶרֶת as the most intense of the whitenesses, a systematization post-dating the biblical legislation.

Sources

  • BDB, s.v. בַּהֶרֶתlexicon
  • HALOT, vol. 1, s.v. בַּהֶרֶתlexicon
  • DCH (Clines), vol. 2, s.v. בַּהֶרֶתlexicon
  • Milgrom, Leviticus 1-16 (AB 3, 1991), pp. 773-87commentary
  • Levine, Leviticus (JPS Torah Commentary, 1989), pp. 76-79commentary
  • Wenham, The Book of Leviticus (NICOT, 1979), pp. 194-201commentary
  • Hartley, Leviticus (WBC 4, 1992), pp. 187-92commentary
  • Hulse, 'The Nature of Biblical "Leprosy" and the Use of Alternative Medical Terms in Modern Translations of the Bible', Palestine Exploration Quarterly 107 (1975): 87-105article
  • Mishnah Nega'im 1:1other

All attested forms of בַּהֶרֶת

f s absolute

בַּהֶרֶת, בֶּהֶרֶת, בֶּהָרֶת

Lev 13:2, Lev 13:4, Lev 13:19, Lev 13:23, Lev 13:24, Lev 13:25, Lev 13:28, Lev 13:26

f p absolute

בֶּהָרֹת

Lev 13:38, Lev 13:38, Lev 13:39