StrongerBible

et

אֵת

HebrewH0854with, beside, ...

Appears 929 times · tap a cell to see the verses

Gen 4:1Gen 5:22Gen 5:24Gen 6:9Gen 6:13Gen 6:18 (2×)Gen 6:19Gen 7:7Gen 7:13Gen 7:23Gen 8:1Gen 8:8Gen 8:16Gen 8:17 (2×)Gen 8:18Gen 9:8Gen 9:9 (2×)Gen 9:10 (3×)Gen 9:11Gen 9:12Gen 11:31Gen 12:4Gen 13:5Gen 14:2 (2×)Gen 14:5Gen 14:8Gen 14:9 (2×)Gen 14:17Gen 14:24Gen 15:18Gen 17:3Gen 17:4Gen 17:19Gen 17:21Gen 17:22Gen 17:27Gen 19:24Gen 20:16 (2×)Gen 21:2Gen 23:8Gen 23:20Gen 24:40Gen 25:10Gen 26:8Gen 26:24Gen 26:27Gen 27:30Gen 30:29Gen 30:33Gen 33:15
Root family
Names & words formed with this
Word studyResearch-gradeET (rhymes with "met")preposition

What et means

with: alongside, in the company of, or in dealing with someone or something

TranslatabilityPartialCertaintySettled

This is the ordinary Hebrew word for "with." Its heart is the idea of one person or thing being next to another, and every other use grows out of that single picture of nearness. From simply being in someone's company it stretches to being at their side in support, to keeping something in one's care, to acting toward another party, and even to the sense "from beside" when a small prefix meaning "from" is attached.

The uses shade into one another rather than dividing cleanly, which is normal for a small connecting word. The main branches are:

  • being in someone's company: going, living, or walking with them
  • standing at someone's side in support, or on their side in a quarrel
  • being near or beside a place
  • being in a person's keeping or at their disposal
  • being the party someone deals with: making an agreement with, speaking with, showing kindness to, or contending against
  • coming "from beside" a person or source

Hebrew has a close partner, ʿim (עִם), that also means "with," and in ordinary prose the two are largely interchangeable, sometimes even in neighboring verses. A frequent trap is that this word is spelled exactly like a separate, untranslatable grammar-marker (the one that flags the direct object of a verb); readers should not blend the two or read hidden meaning into the overlap.

Nuances

1ain the company of: going, living, or walking with someone
TranslatabilityDirect
Gen 5:22Gen 5:24Gen 6:9Gen 6:13Gen 6:19Gen 7:7Gen 7:13Gen 7:23Gen 8:1Gen 12:4Gen 13:5Gen 24:40
1bat someone's side: in support of, or on the side of, a person
Gen 14:5Gen 14:17Gen 21:20Gen 26:24Gen 39:2Gen 39:3Gen 39:21Gen 39:23Jos 14:122Ki 9:32Jer 1:8Jer 1:19
1cnear, beside, or at a place
Gen 33:18Exo 1:7Exo 33:21Lev 4:6Lev 4:17Jos 21:11Jdg 3:19Jdg 4:111Ki 9:251Ki 9:262Ki 9:27Psa 84:3
1din someone's keeping or at their disposal: what a person has with them
Gen 27:15Gen 30:29Gen 30:33Gen 39:6Gen 39:8Gen 44:10Lev 10:15Deu 15:31Sa 9:7Job 14:5Jer 23:28Jer 27:18
1ein the presence or sight of someone
Gen 19:13Gen 19:27Gen 20:16 (2×)Exo 34:23Exo 34:24Deu 16:16Deu 31:111Sa 1:221Sa 2:111Sa 2:171Sa 2:18Isa 30:8
1fthe party one deals with: making an agreement with, speaking with, or showing kindness to someone
Gen 6:18 (2×)Gen 9:9 (2×)Gen 9:11Gen 15:18Gen 17:3Gen 17:4Gen 17:19Gen 17:21Gen 42:30Exo 34:27Deu 5:3Rut 2:20
1gagainst: the party one contends or strives with
Gen 14:2 (2×)Gen 14:8Gen 14:9 (2×)Num 20:13Psa 127:5Isa 45:9Jer 1:16Jer 4:12Jer 12:1Jer 39:5Jer 52:9Ezk 20:35
1hfrom beside: from a person or source (with a prefixed "from")
Gen 8:8Gen 19:24Gen 44:28Exo 11:2 (2×)Num 18:26 (2×)Deu 2:6 (2×)Deu 18:3Jos 11:201Ki 12:24Psa 118:23Isa 54:17Hab 2:13
1iwith the help of someone
CertaintyContested
Gen 4:1Jdg 8:7
Gen 4:1

How to read the word אֵת in Eve's exclamation at the birth of Cain, קָנִיתִי אִישׁ אֶת־יְהוָה. Every ancient version already found the clause difficult and reshaped it, and modern scholars remain divided over whether the word here is the object marker or a preposition, and if a preposition, which one.

  • majorityIt is the preposition "with," in the sense "with the help of": Eve gives thanks that she bore a son by the LORD's aid. This is the prevailing modern reading and stands behind most English translations, though the exact "help of" sense is otherwise unattested for the word and has to be supplied from the context.; Gordon J. Wenham, Genesis 1-15 (Word Biblical Commentary 1), 101-102; Victor P. Hamilton, The Book of Genesis: Chapters 1-17 (NICOT), 220-222; Nahum M. Sarna, Genesis (JPS Torah Commentary), 32-33; E. A. Speiser, Genesis (Anchor Bible 1), 29-32
  • minorityIt is the preposition "with" in a comparative sense, "equally with, on a par with," a nuance the word carries elsewhere (Leviticus 26:39; Isaiah 45:9): "I have produced a man equally with the LORD." Umberto Cassuto reads Eve's words as an exuberant boast of sharing in creation, and Bruce Waltke as prideful overreach continuing the fall; the classical rabbinic tradition (Rashi, drawing on the Talmud) hears the same "together with" more devoutly, as partnership with God in bringing forth life.; Umberto Cassuto, A Commentary on the Book of Genesis, Part One, 197-201; Bruce K. Waltke, Genesis: A Commentary, 96; Rashi on Genesis 4:1 (drawing on b. Niddah 31a and Genesis Rabbah 22:2)
  • minorityIt is the preposition "with" marking the LORD as co-agent in conception: "I have brought forth a man together with the LORD," the LORD sharing in the act of procreation, as he elsewhere opens the wombs of the matriarchs. This reading leans on the Ugaritic use of the same Hebrew verb for divine begetting.; David E. Bokovoy, "Did Eve Acquire, Create, or Procreate with Yahweh? A Grammatical and Contextual Reassessment," Vetus Testamentum 63 (2013): 19-35
  • minorityIt is a preposition of source, "from": "I have gained a man from the LORD." This recent proposal matches what the earliest translators did with the line (the old Aramaic, Greek, and Syriac versions all render it "from before" or "through" the LORD) and is argued to be the strongest reading on linguistic grounds, since the verb "acquire" normally takes its source with this preposition.; Ellen van Wolde, "What did Eve say? A study of Genesis 4.1b," Journal for the Study of the Old Testament 49.4 (2025): 435-448; R. Borger, "Genesis 4:1," Vetus Testamentum 9 (1959): 85-86
  • minorityIt is the object marker, placing "the LORD" in apposition to "a man": "I have gotten a man, namely the LORD." On this reading Eve hails the newborn as the LORD himself, the promised deliverer of Genesis 3:15. This is Luther's reading; modern criticism has essentially abandoned it as anachronistic and syntactically forced, and its conservative defenders now soften it to a mistaken hope that Cain was the promised offspring rather than a claim that he was God.; Martin Luther, Lectures on Genesis (Luther's Works, vol. 1), 242; Walter C. Kaiser Jr., The Messiah in the Old Testament (Zondervan, 1995), 37-41; C. John Collins, Genesis 1-4: A Linguistic, Literary, and Theological Commentary (P&R, 2006), 194-198

What scholars say about et

The reference works treat this preposition (H0854) and the homographic object marker (H0853) as two separate lexemes that merged only in the unsuffixed written form; the Masoretic pointing keeps them apart in the suffixed forms (ḥireq-plus-dagesh for the preposition versus ḥolem for the object marker). The clearest cognate is Akkadian itti "with," whose suffixed paradigm matches the Hebrew exactly; the deeper Proto-Semitic etymology (from *ʾint- by assimilation, per BDB, Joüon-Muraoka, and Bauer-Leander, versus a fossilized nominal) is left unresolved by most comparativists. HALOT and Gesenius (18th ed.) lemmatize the preposition separately and organize its roughly 890 occurrences into a grid of accompaniment, proximity, presence, partisanship, possession, and the compound מֵאֵת of origination; DCH catalogs the same range collocationally; BDB preserves the intuition that this word "expresses closer association than עִם." Ernst Jenni (TLOT) characterizes it as locative and juxtapositional against the sociative עִם, a minority reading that Waltke-O'Connor (IBHS), Muraoka's Joüon, Van der Merwe-Naudé-Kroeze (BHRG), and Hardy (2022) treat as a prototype-and-extension tendency rather than a hard rule, since Classical prose neutralizes the contrast freely (Gen 26:3 versus 26:24 in one cycle). Diachronically the free-standing form declines from Classical to Late Biblical Hebrew and Qumran (Kropat; Hurvitz; Qimron) and disappears in Mishnaic Hebrew, where only its suffixed pronoun forms survive, absorbed suppletively into the paradigm of עִם. On the object marker, James Barr (1961) and, more recently, Peter Bekins (2014, differential object marking) and Wilson-Wright (2016) warn against pressing the particle for theological weight, a caution that also guards against blurring the two homographs. The single most-disputed token is Genesis 4:1, Eve's קָנִיתִי אִישׁ אֶת־יְהוָה, where the tradition splits over whether אֵת is the object marker (Luther's now-abandoned appositional reading, on which Cain is hailed as YHWH) or a preposition, and among prepositional readings over "with the help of" (the comfortable but lexically unattested majority: Wenham, Hamilton, Sarna, Speiser), Cassuto's comparative "equally with" (intensified to hubris by Waltke, softened to devout partnership by Rashi and Genesis Rabbah), Bokovoy's co-agentive "together with" (VT 63 [2013]), and a source reading "from." Ellen van Wolde's Construction-Grammar case for the source sense (JSOT 49 [2025]) revives R. Borger's appeal (VT 9 [1959]) to Middle Assyrian birth-names of the type Itti-ili-ašamšu and aligns with the unanimous versional evidence (Onkelos מִן קֳדָם, the Septuagint's διά, the Peshitta's lāmedh), the ancient translators each having reshaped the clause to defuse it.

Where scholars disagree about et

Whether this preposition and the identically written object marker (H0853) are one word with a range of uses or two separate words that came to be spelled alike.

  • majorityTwo distinct words with separate origins that merged only in the base written form; the vowel difference in the suffixed forms preserves the old split.; A. Wilson-Wright, Hebrew Studies 57 (2016): 7-15; H. H. Hardy II, "Whence Come Direct Object Markers in Northwest Semitic?" JSS 61 (2016): 297-318; Bauer & Leander, Historische Grammatik der hebräischen Sprache (1922)
  • minorityUltimately one word, the object marker being a later development of the preposition of nearness.; GKC (Gesenius-Kautzsch-Cowley), §103b; BDB, pp. 84-85, s.v. אֵת
In-depth research

These are research papers, so they may be hard to read without scholarly background. They are useful if you want to dig even deeper into this word.

Sources

  • HALOT, s.v. אֵת II (prep.)lexicon
  • BDB, pp. 84-87, s.v. אֵתlexicon
  • Gesenius, Hebräisches und Aramäisches Handwörterbuch, 18th ed.lexicon
  • DCH (Clines), s.v. אֵת IIlexicon
  • E. Jenni, "אֵת," in TLOT (Jenni-Westermann)theological-dictionary
  • Waltke & O'Connor, An Introduction to Biblical Hebrew Syntax, §11.2.14grammar
  • Joüon & Muraoka, A Grammar of Biblical Hebrew, §§103j-k, 132-133grammar
  • Van der Merwe, Naudé & Kroeze, A Biblical Hebrew Reference Grammar, 2nd ed., §§39.11, 39.19grammar
  • A. Wilson-Wright, "A Reevaluation of the Semitic Direct Object Markers," Hebrew Studies 57 (2016): 7-15article
  • H. H. Hardy II, The Development of Biblical Hebrew Prepositions (ANEM 28, SBL Press, 2022)monograph
  • P. Bekins, Transitivity and Object Marking in Biblical Hebrew (HSS 64, Eisenbrauns, 2014)monograph
  • James Barr, The Semantics of Biblical Language (Oxford, 1961)monograph
  • Ellen van Wolde, "What did Eve say? A study of Genesis 4.1b," Journal for the Study of the Old Testament 49.4 (2025): 435-448article
  • R. Borger, "Genesis 4:1," Vetus Testamentum 9 (1959): 85-86article

All attested forms of אֵת

prep

אֶת, אִתּ, אִתָּ, אֵת, אִתְּ, אִתִּ, אוֹתָ, אֹתָ, אוֹת, אֹת, אוֹתִ, אֹתִ, אוֹתְ, אִתֵּ, אֶתּ

Gen 4:1, Gen 5:22, Gen 5:24, Gen 6:9, Gen 6:13, Gen 9:9, Gen 13:5, Gen 14:2

particle

אֵת, אִתָּ, אִתִּ

Gen 17:27, Exo 11:2, Exo 11:2, Exo 29:28, Exo 29:28, Lev 7:34, Lev 7:34, Num 17:2