StrongerBible

eḥad

אֶחָד

HebrewH0259one, first, ...

Appears 971 times · tap a cell to see the verses

Gen 1:5Gen 1:9Gen 2:11Gen 2:21Gen 2:24Gen 3:22Gen 4:19Gen 8:5Gen 8:13 (2×)Gen 10:25Gen 11:1 (2×)Gen 11:6 (2×)Gen 19:9Gen 21:15Gen 22:2Gen 26:10Gen 27:38Gen 27:44Gen 27:45Gen 29:20Gen 32:8(9)Gen 32:22(23)Gen 33:13Gen 34:16Gen 34:22Gen 37:9Gen 37:20Gen 40:5Gen 41:5Gen 41:11Gen 41:22Gen 42:13Gen 42:27Gen 42:32Gen 42:33Gen 44:28Gen 48:22Gen 49:16Exo 1:15Exo 12:18Exo 12:49Exo 16:22Exo 16:33Exo 23:29Exo 25:12Exo 25:36Exo 26:2 (3×)Exo 26:4Exo 26:5Exo 26:8 (3×)
Root family
Names & words formed with this
Word studyResearch-gradeeh-KHAHDadjective

What eḥad means

one: the cardinal number one, with the everyday senses that grow out of counting a single thing

TranslatabilityPartialCertaintySettled

At its core this is simply the number one. It behaves like a describing word that follows its noun and agrees with it (one man, one day, one woman), and almost everything else it does in the Bible is an ordinary outgrowth of counting a single item. Because it names one thing, it slides easily into singling out one unspecified member of a group (a certain man), into naming the opening item in a counted run of days or months, into spreading one across a set (each one, one to another), into saying that things that could be counted as many are really one and the same, and, in its plural form, into the vague small number a few.

The senses below sort these everyday jobs apart so a reader can see which one a given verse is doing. They are shades of the same number, not separate words, which is why every standard lexicon keeps them under one entry. The lines between plain one, a single, and the same are often soft, and translators differ verse by verse, so many occurrences are left unsorted here rather than forced into a slot.

The most weighed-on uses are the ones where calling something one makes a claim about unity:

  • a man and a woman become one flesh
  • two sticks become one stick
  • a scattered people is gathered into one nation

The unity in these cases comes from the thing being described, not from a special meaning hidden inside the number itself, which is the point modern scholarship presses hardest. The single most discussed verse is the opening line of the Shema, where what one claims about God is a long-running question the number alone does not settle (see the disputes).

Nuances

1athe plain counting number one: a single item, person, or unit
TranslatabilityDirect
Gen 1:9Gen 2:21Gen 27:38Gen 27:45Gen 33:13Gen 41:5Gen 41:11Exo 12:46Num 7:13Deu 17:61Sa 13:17Job 9:3
1bfirst: the counting number one used to name the opening day or month in a series
Gen 1:5Gen 8:5Gen 8:13 (2×)Exo 40:2Exo 40:17Deu 1:31Ch 27:12Ch 29:172Ch 36:22Ezr 1:1Ezr 3:6Ezr 7:9
1ca certain one, a single one: singling out one unspecified or lone member of a group
Gen 2:11Gen 21:15Gen 42:16Gen 42:19Lev 4:13Lev 4:22Lev 4:27Lev 5:171Sa 1:12Sa 18:101Ki 19:41Ki 22:9
1deach one, one to another: the number spread across a group or paired off against itself
Exo 17:12Exo 25:19Exo 36:10 (4×)Num 1:44Num 7:11Num 13:2Num 17:3Num 17:6Num 28:4Num 34:181Ki 6:24Ezk 1:6
1eone and the same: two or more things shown to be a single identical one
Gen 11:1 (2×)Gen 40:5Gen 41:25Gen 41:26Exo 12:49Lev 7:7Lev 24:22Num 9:14Num 15:15Num 15:16Num 15:291Sa 2:34
1fone as a united whole: many parts joined or gathered into a single thing
Gen 2:24Gen 11:6 (2×)Gen 34:16Gen 34:22Exo 24:3Exo 26:6Exo 26:11Exo 36:13Exo 36:18Ezk 37:17Ezk 37:19Ezk 37:22
1galone, the only one: one used of a person or of God to say there is no other beside
Deu 6:4Job 23:13Job 31:15Ecc 4:8Sng 6:9Isa 51:2Dan 10:21Zec 14:7Zec 14:9Mal 2:10Mal 2:15
1ha few: the plural form used for a small, unspecified number
Gen 27:44Gen 29:20Dan 11:20

Disputed

Whether the number one at Genesis 1:5 (yom echad) should be read as the ordinal first (the first day) or as the cardinal one (one day, defining a day as one evening-and-morning cycle).

  • majorityOrdinal: the first day, with the cardinal standing in for an ordinal as Hebrew often allows in such series.; Wenham, Genesis 1-15 (WBC), at 1:5; Westermann, Genesis 1-11, at 1:5; Hamilton, The Book of Genesis: Chapters 1-17 (NICOT), at 1:5
  • minorityCardinal: one day, the text defining one day as evening plus morning rather than ranking it first in a series; the unusual lack of the article on both words tells against the ordinal reading.; Steinmann, "echad as an Ordinal Number and the Meaning of Genesis 1:5," JETS 45 (2002): 577-84; Cassuto, A Commentary on the Book of Genesis, Part I, at 1:5

What scholars say about eḥad

Modern Semitic lexicography is agreed that this word is simply the cardinal number one, together with predictable contextual extensions: an indefinite a certain, the distributive each, one and the same, alone or the only one (especially with proper names), and the plural a few. The standard lexicons (BDB, HALOT, DCH, Gesenius) and the major theological dictionaries (TDOT, by Lohfink and Bergman, and TLOT, by Jenni) all map this single range, and none lists a compound or composite oneness as a separate sense. Where the word seems to describe a plurality made one (one flesh, one tabernacle, two sticks made one), scholars stress that the compoundness belongs to the thing described, not to the number, and that reading it into the word commits the error James Barr called illegitimate totality transfer (also treated by Silva and Carson). Daniel Block's study of Deuteronomy 6:4 is the fullest recent refutation of the popular compound-unity claim, and Block, Tigay, MacDonald, and Driver converge on reading the Shema as a confession of the LORD's exclusive claim on Israel rather than a statement about God's inner constitution, though Weinfeld and Gordon prefer unique or incomparable and Janzen reads integral, wholehearted. The plural a few and the ordinal-or-cardinal question at Genesis 1:5 (Steinmann versus the standard commentaries) are the other points of live discussion.

Where scholars disagree about eḥad

What one claims about God at Deuteronomy 6:4, the Shema (the LORD our God, the LORD is one). The verse is a terse clause with no verb, so both how to supply the missing verb and what one means are open, and the number itself does not decide either.

  • majorityExclusive allegiance: one says the LORD alone is Israel's God, the LORD and no other (often rendered the LORD alone). This is the dominant modern reading and is not in the first place a statement about how many gods exist.; Tigay, Deuteronomy (JPS Torah Commentary), at 6:4; MacDonald, Deuteronomy and the Meaning of 'Monotheism' (FAT II/1); Block, "How Many Is God?" JETS 47 (2004): 193-212; Driver, A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on Deuteronomy (ICC), at 6:4
  • minorityUnique or incomparable: one declares the LORD to be one of a kind, drawing on ancient hymnic parallels that praise a god as the one who is unmatched.; Weinfeld, Deuteronomy 1-11 (Anchor Bible), at 6:4; Gordon, "His Name Is 'One,'" JNES 29 (1970): 198-99
  • minorityIntegral or wholehearted: the LORD's oneness is the unbroken consistency between his purpose and his action, which grounds the call for Israel's undivided love in the next verse.; Janzen, "On the Most Important Word in the Shema," VT 37 (1987): 280-300; Merrill, Deuteronomy (NAC), at 6:4

A popular claim, common in apologetic and some Trinitarian writing, holds that this word means a built-up or compound oneness (one made of parts), in deliberate contrast to a different Hebrew word said to mean an absolute solitary one, so that the Shema leaves room for plurality within God.

  • minorityThis word denotes a compound or composite unity, distinct from a word for absolute oneness, and the choice of it in the Shema is significant.; Bullinger, The Companion Bible, note on Deuteronomy 6:4; Geisler, Systematic Theology, vol. 2
  • majorityThere is no compound-unity sense: the word is the ordinary number one, any compoundness lies in the thing being counted (one flesh, one nation), and the supposed contrast fails because the other word means uniquely beloved or the only one that counts, not arithmetically solitary. The major lexicons and a wide range of scholars across the theological spectrum reject the claim.; Block, "How Many Is God?" JETS 47 (2004): 193-212; Barr, The Semantics of Biblical Language; Lohfink, Bergman, "echad," in TDOT, vol. 1
In-depth research

This is a research paper, so it may be hard to read without scholarly background. It is useful if you want to dig even deeper into this word.

Sources

  • Brown, Driver, Briggs, A Hebrew and English Lexicon of the Old Testament, s.v. echadlexicon
  • Koehler, Baumgartner, The Hebrew and Aramaic Lexicon of the Old Testament (HALOT), s.v. echadlexicon
  • Clines (ed.), The Dictionary of Classical Hebrew, s.v. echadlexicon
  • Lohfink, Bergman, "echad," in Theological Dictionary of the Old Testament (TDOT), vol. 1theological-dictionary
  • Jenni, "echad," in Theological Lexicon of the Old Testament (TLOT), vol. 1theological-dictionary
  • Block, "How Many Is God? An Investigation into the Meaning of Deuteronomy 6:4-5," JETS 47 (2004): 193-212article
  • Tigay, Deuteronomy (JPS Torah Commentary), at 6:4commentary
  • MacDonald, Deuteronomy and the Meaning of 'Monotheism' (FAT II/1)monograph
  • Steinmann, "echad as an Ordinal Number and the Meaning of Genesis 1:5," JETS 45 (2002): 577-84article
  • Barr, The Semantics of Biblical Languagemonograph

All attested forms of אֶחָד

f s absolute

אֶחָד, אַחַת, אֶחָת, אַחַד

Gen 1:5, Gen 1:9, Gen 2:24, Gen 11:6, Gen 27:45, Gen 33:13, Gen 34:16, Gen 34:22

conj

אֶחָד, אַחַת, אֶחָת, אַחַד, אֲחָדִים

Gen 2:11, Gen 8:5, Gen 8:13, Gen 10:25, Gen 19:9, Gen 42:13, Gen 42:27, Gen 42:32

f s construct

אַחַת, אַחַד, אֶחָד, אֶחָת

Exo 29:23, Exo 29:23, Exo 30:10, Exo 30:10, Lev 8:26, Lev 8:26, Num 15:16, Deu 4:42

m p absolute

אֲחָדִים

Gen 11:1, Gen 27:44, Gen 29:20, Dan 11:20

c s absolute

אַחַד

Jdg 16:13