StrongerBible

hupernikaō

ὑπερνικάω

GreekG5245more than conquerors, overwhelmingly conquer, ...

Appears 1 time · tap a cell to see the verses

Rom 8:37
Compound of
Word studyResearch-gradehoo-per-nee-KAH-ohverb

What hupernikaō means

to conquer overwhelmingly: to win far beyond an ordinary victory, to be more than a conqueror

TranslatabilityPartialCertaintySettled

This is a strengthened form of the ordinary verb for winning or conquering (νικάω). The prefix ("hyper," the same root behind the English "hyper-") pushes the base verb to its highest pitch: not merely to win, but to win decisively, to conquer beyond conquering. Paul uses the word once, at the climax of Romans 8, and he may well have coined it himself; he had a marked fondness for piling this prefix onto words to reach for something the plain word could not hold.

The force is genuinely intensive, not decorative. Every major lexicon agrees the word means "an overwhelming, surpassing victory," which is why English versions reach for a phrase ("more than conquerors," "win an overwhelming victory") rather than a single word. The one place scholars differ is over what kind of "more" Paul intends, and that is a question about his theology, not about the meaning of the word.

What makes it striking is where Paul places it. He has just quoted a psalm describing believers as sheep marked for slaughter, and into that picture of visible defeat he drops this word for surpassing triumph. The victory is not won by escaping the hardships but in the very midst of them, and its ground is not the believers' own strength but the love of the one who died for them.

Rom 8:37

What scholars say about hupernikaō

ὑπερνικάω is a ὑπερ-compound of νικάω, a New Testament hapax legomenon confined to Rom 8:37. The lexica are unanimous on its semantic value: BDAG (3rd ed., 1034) gives "a heightened form of νικᾶν, prevail completely"; LSJ "prevail completely over, be more than conqueror"; Louw-Nida (§39.58) "be completely and overwhelmingly victorious"; Thayer "to be more than a conqueror, gain a surpassing victory"; and Bauernfeind (TDNT IV.942-945) treats it as a heightened Hellenistic compound whose weight lies in the qualifying διὰ τοῦ ἀγαπήσαντος ἡμᾶς. The intensifying ὑπερ- is part of Paul's dense signature of ὑπερ-formations (ὑπερβάλλω, ὑπερεκπερισσοῦ, ὑπερυψόω, and others); every major grammar (Robertson, Moulton-Howard, Turner) treats the prefix as semantically live rather than faded. The commentary tradition (Sanday-Headlam ICC; Cranfield ICC; Dunn WBC; Käsemann; Moo NICNT; Schreiner BECNT; Fitzmyer AB; Wright NIB; Jewett Hermeneia; Witherington; Murray) agrees on the intensified force and divides only over its theological register (Stoic self-mastery, apocalyptic triumph, cruciform paradox, or anti-imperial subversion) and over the sense of the accompanying preposition ἐν ("in the midst of" vs "in spite of"). A separate diachronic question is whether the verb is a Pauline coinage; it is absent from the LXX, Philo, Josephus, and the papyri, and the alleged pre-Pauline attestations (a Menander epigram, Hippocrates Hebd. 50) are individually contestable.

Where scholars disagree about hupernikaō

Whether ὑπερνικάω is a Pauline coinage or a rare, pre-existing Hellenistic compound Paul reactivated. This is a question about the word's history, not its meaning, which is agreed.

  • majorityMost likely coined by Paul (or with no surviving pre-Pauline life): the word is absent from the LXX, Philo, Josephus, and the papyri, and fits his habit of forming ὑπερ-compounds.; W. Sanday and A. C. Headlam, Romans, ICC, 5th ed. (1902), on 8:37; J. Denney, Expositor's Greek Testament (1900), 2:653; R. Jewett, Romans, Hermeneia (Fortress, 2007), p. 549
  • minorityA rare Hellenistic compound with some pre-Pauline attestation, chiefly a Menander epigram (καλὸν τὸ νικᾶν, ὑπερνικᾶν δὲ σφαλερόν) cited to this effect.; C. E. B. Cranfield, Romans, ICC (T&T Clark, 1975), 1:441
In-depth research

This is a research paper, so it may be hard to read without scholarly background. It is useful if you want to dig even deeper into this word.

Sources

  • BDAG, 3rd ed. (2000), s.v. ὑπερνικάω, p. 1034lexicon
  • LSJ, 9th ed. with Revised Supplement (1996), s.v. ὑπερνικάωlexicon
  • Louw-Nida, Greek-English Lexicon Based on Semantic Domains, §39.58lexicon
  • J. Thayer, Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament (1889), s.v. ὑπερνικάωlexicon
  • O. Bauernfeind, "νικάω κτλ.," TDNT IV.942-945theological-dictionary
  • C. E. B. Cranfield, Romans, ICC (T&T Clark, 1975), 1:441commentary
  • J. D. G. Dunn, Romans 1-8, WBC 38A (Word, 1988), pp. 511-512commentary
  • W. Sanday and A. C. Headlam, Romans, ICC, 5th ed. (1902), on 8:37commentary
  • D. J. Moo, The Epistle to the Romans, NICNT (Eerdmans, 1996), p. 542commentary
  • R. Jewett, Romans, Hermeneia (Fortress, 2007), pp. 541-549commentary
  • A. T. Robertson, A Grammar of the Greek New Testament in the Light of Historical Research, 4th ed. (Broadman, 1934), pp. 625-633grammar

All attested forms of ὑπερνικάω

present active indicative 1p

ὑπερνικῶμεν

Rom 8:37