StrongerBible

proginōskō

προγινώσκω

GreekG4267foreknow, foreordain

Appears 5 times · tap a cell to see the verses

Act 26:5Rom 8:29Rom 11:21Pe 1:202Pe 3:17
Compound of
Root family
Word studyResearch-gradeprog-ee-NOH-skohverb

What proginōskō means

to know beforehand: to be aware of someone or something in advance

TranslatabilityApproximateCertaintyStrong

At its core this verb simply joins "before" to the ordinary word for knowing, so it means to know, perceive, or recognize something ahead of time. Outside the Bible that is nearly always what it meant: the advance knowledge a doctor has when predicting how an illness will go, or a long acquaintance with a person you have known for years. The English word "prognosis" comes straight from its noun.

When people are the ones doing the knowing, the New Testament uses it in exactly this plain way. Paul tells King Agrippa that the Jews have known him for a long time, and Peter tells his readers that they now know something in advance and so can be on guard. No one disputes these cases.

The hard cases are the ones where God is the one who knows beforehand. There the word seems to carry more weight than cool advance information, and many scholars read it as a relational, choosing kind of knowing rather than mere prior awareness. That fuller sense is treated separately below, because whether it is truly a different shade of meaning or just the same plain word in a heavier setting is itself debated.

Nuances

1ato know about a person or fact ahead of time; to have known someone for a long while
Act 26:52Pe 3:17
1bof God: to set one's regard on someone in advance; to know with a committed, choosing love before they exist
Rom 8:29Rom 11:21Pe 1:20

Disputed

Whether this verb, when God is its subject, means a relational and elective knowing (to set covenant love on, to choose beforehand) or only plain advance knowledge (prescience).

  • majorityIt carries a relational, elective force drawn from the Hebrew sense of "knowing" as singling out and committing to a people; God foreknows persons, not merely facts about them. This is now the dominant reading across Reformed, Catholic, Lutheran, and New Perspective commentators.; C. E. B. Cranfield, The Epistle to the Romans (ICC), vol. 1, p. 431; John Murray, The Epistle to the Romans (NICNT, 1959/68), pp. 316-18; Thomas R. Schreiner, Romans (BECNT, 2nd ed. 2018), pp. 449-53; James D. G. Dunn, Romans 1-8 (WBC 38A, 1988), p. 482
  • minorityIt means ordinary prior cognition; the relational sense is read back into the word from later theology, since no extra-biblical Greek and no Greek translation of the Hebrew Bible uses this compound for electing, and a compound word does not simply inherit a Hebrew word's range.; Thomas R. Edgar, 'The Meaning of ΠΡΟΓΙΝΩΣΚΩ', Chafer Theological Seminary Journal 9.1 (2003): 43-80; Paul A. Himes, Foreknowledge and Social Identity in 1 Peter (Wipf & Stock, 2014); D. A. Carson, Exegetical Fallacies (2nd ed., 1996), pp. 28-32, 61-62

What scholars say about proginōskō

In classical and Hellenistic Greek προγινώσκω (Attic προγιγνώσκω) is narrowly cognitive, predictive, or judicial (LSJ; Moulton-Milligan), and the heaviest contemporary users, Josephus, Plutarch, and Philo, employ it almost exclusively for knowledge of future events. The relational-elective reading of the NT God-subject passages rests on the Hebrew יָדַע bridge: יָדַע can denote elective acknowledgment (Gen 18:19; Amos 3:2; Jer 1:5), the LXX renders יָדַע with γινώσκω, and so the προ- compound is held to inherit that range (Bultmann, TDNT 1:715-16, followed by Cranfield, Murray, Moo, Schreiner, Dunn, Fitzmyer, and most 1 Peter specialists including Michaels, Jobes, and Achtemeier). BDAG, Louw-Nida, EDNT, and NIDNTT add a "choose beforehand" sub-sense for these passages. Critics (Edgar 2003; Himes 2014; Poythress; methodologically Barr and Carson) reply that the LXX never uses προγινώσκω/πρόγνωσις to translate יָדַע, that a compound's meaning is not the sum of its parts, and that the elective sense is theologically interpolated rather than lexically attested; Acts 26:5, with a personal object yet a plainly cognitive sense, is their lexical control. The lexical question is now largely resolved toward the relational reading, while the theological question it bears on (Calvinist, Arminian, corporate-election, and mediating positions) remains genuinely open, since the relational sense is compatible with several accounts of how divine and human agency interact (McCall and Stanglin, Trinity Journal 26 [2005]).

In-depth research

This is a research paper, so it may be hard to read without scholarly background. It is useful if you want to dig even deeper into this word.

Sources

  • Liddell-Scott-Jones, A Greek-English Lexicon (9th ed.), s.v. προγιγνώσκωlexicon
  • BDAG (3rd ed., 2000), pp. 866-867lexicon
  • R. Bultmann, 'γινώσκω κτλ.', TDNT 1:689-719, esp. 715-16lexicon
  • A. Sand, 'προγινώσκω, πρόγνωσις', EDNT 3:153-54lexicon
  • Thomas R. Schreiner, Romans (BECNT, 2nd ed. 2018), pp. 449-53commentary
  • John Murray, The Epistle to the Romans (NICNT, 1959/68), pp. 316-18commentary
  • Douglas Moo, The Epistle to the Romans (NICNT, 2nd ed. 2018), pp. 531-34commentary
  • S. M. Baugh, 'The Meaning of Foreknowledge', in Still Sovereign (Baker, 2000), pp. 183-200monograph
  • Thomas R. Edgar, 'The Meaning of ΠΡΟΓΙΝΩΣΚΩ', Chafer Theological Seminary Journal 9.1 (2003): 43-80article
  • Paul A. Himes, Foreknowledge and Social Identity in 1 Peter (Wipf & Stock, 2014)monograph
  • Tom McCall and Keith D. Stanglin, 'S. M. Baugh and the Meaning of Foreknowledge: Another Look', Trinity Journal 26 NS (2005): 19-31article

All attested forms of προγινώσκω

present active participle nominative m p

προγινώσκοντες, προγινώσκοντές

2Pe 3:17, Act 26:5

second-aorist active indicative 3s

προέγνω

Rom 8:29, Rom 11:2

perfect passive participle genitive m s

προεγνωσμένου

1Pe 1:20