StrongerBible

horkos

ὅρκος

GreekG3727oath

Appears 10 times · tap a cell to see the verses

Mat 5:33Mat 14:7Mat 14:9Mat 26:72Mrk 6:26Luk 1:73Act 2:30Heb 6:16Heb 6:17Jas 5:12
Root family
Names & words formed with this
Word studyResearch-gradeHOR-kosnoun

What horkos means

oath: a solemn sworn word that binds the speaker, calling on God as guarantor

TranslatabilityApproximateCertaintySettled

An oath is a binding word. When someone swears one, they call on God to hold them to what they say, so that their promise can no longer be taken back. Ancient readers even heard in the word the idea of a fence or a restraint: an oath hems the speaker in. Built into it is a hidden threat against the speaker's own self, since to swear falsely is to invite God's punishment on your own head.

The New Testament pulls this one word in two directions depending on who is speaking. When people swear, it tends to go wrong. Herod is trapped by the oaths he blurted out at a party and has John the Baptist killed rather than lose face. Peter swears he never knew Jesus, and the sworn word is the one that proves false. Because of this, Jesus tells his followers to stop swearing altogether and simply let their yes mean yes, and James repeats the command almost word for word. The point is not that promises are bad, but that a community whose plain word is fully trustworthy has no need to prop it up with oaths.

When God is the one who swears, the very same word becomes the ground of hope. God cannot appeal to anyone greater, so he swears by himself, and the letter to the Hebrews makes this the anchor of Christian confidence: God has bound his own promise beyond any possibility of change. The oath God swore to Abraham and to David runs through the songs and sermons of the early church as the reason his rescue cannot fail.

Several close relatives sit nearby. The plain verb for the act of swearing is ὄμνυμι, and Hebrews uses a separate, weightier word for the solemn ceremony of oath-taking, ὁρκωμοσία. Behind the Greek stand two Hebrew words this one absorbs: שׁבועה, a sworn promise, and אלה, an oath that carries a curse.

Nuances

1aa person's binding oath: the solemn sworn word someone invokes, and the promise it commits them to
TranslatabilityDirect
Mat 5:33Mat 14:7Mat 14:9Mrk 6:26Heb 6:16Jas 5:12
1ba self-cursing oath: swearing something while calling down a curse on oneself if it proves false
Mat 26:72
1cGod's oath: God irrevocably binding his own promise by swearing it
Luk 1:73Act 2:30Heb 6:17

What scholars say about horkos

ὅρκος occurs ten times in the NT (Matt 5:33; 14:7, 9; 26:72; Mark 6:26; Luke 1:73; Acts 2:30; Heb 6:16, 17; Jas 5:12). BDAG defines it as a statement made under divine guarantee, distinguishing the act or formula of swearing (Matt 14:7; Mark 6:26; Heb 6:16) from the content sworn (Matt 5:33; Luke 1:73); EDNT (Vorländer) adds the sanction as a third functional facet, while noting that in most passages the weight falls on the binding word itself, and Louw-Nida 33.463 group ὅρκος with ὄμνυμι and ὁρκωμοσία. The word's freight is largely Septuagintal: the LXX renders both שְׁבוּעָה (assertory/promissory oath) and אָלָה (curse-oath) with ὅρκος, fusing promise and self-imprecation into one lexeme (Muraoka; Tov; Lee). On the human side, Matt 5:33-37 and Jas 5:12 stand within a Second Temple oath-reform trajectory (Sir 23:9-11; Philo, Decal. 84 and Spec. 2.2-17; Josephus on the Essenes, BJ 2.135; CD 15:1-5; 1QS 5:7-11), and interpreters divide over whether Jesus abolishes oaths outright (Luz, Hermeneia; Meier, A Marginal Jew 4:182-204; Davies-Allison) or targets only the casuistic system of graded surrogate oaths (France, NICNT; Keener; Hagner). Matthew's Herod (14:7, 9) and Peter (26:72, climaxing in the self-curse of 26:74) function as case studies of the very swearing 5:33-37 forbids. On the divine side, Hebrews expounds God's oath as the anchor of hope, fusing Gen 22:16 LXX (Heb 6:13-18) and Ps 110:4 LXX (Heb 7:20-28), and deliberately shifting to ὁρκωμοσία for the cultic-legal act (Attridge; Lane; Koester; Ellingworth); the Philonic parallels (Leg. All. 3.203-208; Sacr. 91-96) drove Spicq's direct-dependence thesis, which Williamson dismantled and most now reject in favor of a shared Alexandrian-Jewish exegetical background. Luke 1:73 and Acts 2:30 read the Abrahamic and Davidic covenants as sworn covenants (Bovon; Fitzmyer; Barrett; Keener). The traditional etymology links ὅρκος to ἕρκος (fence, restraint), yielding the oath-as-binding-thing model (LSJ; Chantraine; Frisk), though Beekes is cautious.

In-depth research

This is a research paper, so it may be hard to read without scholarly background. It is useful if you want to dig even deeper into this word.

Sources

  • BDAG (Danker, ed.), A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament, 3rd ed. (2000), 723, s.v. ὅρκοςlexicon
  • J. P. Louw and E. A. Nida, Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament Based on Semantic Domains (1989), 33.463lexicon
  • T. Muraoka, A Greek-English Lexicon of the Septuagint (2009), 501-502, s.v. ὅρκοςlexicon
  • R. S. P. Beekes, Etymological Dictionary of Greek (2010), 2:1103, s.v. ὅρκοςlexicon
  • J. Schneider, "ὄμνυμι, ὅρκος, ὁρκίζω, ὁρκωμοσία," in Theological Dictionary of the New Testament (TDNT) 5 (1967): 457-467theological-dictionary
  • H. Vorländer, "ὅρκος," in Exegetical Dictionary of the New Testament (EDNT) 2:531-532theological-dictionary
  • C. Spicq, Theological Lexicon of the New Testament (TLNT), 2:585-601, s.v. ὀμνύω, ὅρκος, ὁρκωμοσίαtheological-dictionary
  • M. Silva, ed., New International Dictionary of New Testament Theology and Exegesis (NIDNTTE), 3:552-571theological-dictionary
  • U. Luz, Matthew 1-7 (Hermeneia, 2007), 259-272commentary
  • J. P. Meier, A Marginal Jew, Vol. 4: Law and Love (2009), 182-204monograph
  • R. T. France, The Gospel of Matthew (NICNT, 2007), 214-217commentary
  • C. S. Keener, A Commentary on the Gospel of Matthew (1999), 192-197commentary
  • D. C. Allison, A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Epistle of James (ICC, 2013), 719-736commentary
  • H. W. Attridge, The Epistle to the Hebrews (Hermeneia, 1989), 179-181, 209-211commentary
  • R. Williamson, Philo and the Epistle to the Hebrews (ALGHJ 4, 1970)monograph

All attested forms of ὅρκος

accusative m p

ὅρκους

Mat 5:33, Mat 14:9, Mrk 6:26

accusative m s

ὅρκον

Luk 1:73, Jas 5:12

dative m s

ὅρκῳ

Act 2:30, Heb 6:17

genitive m s

ὅρκου

Mat 14:7, Mat 26:72

nominative m s

ὅρκος

Heb 6:16