StrongerBible

loipon

λοιπόν

GreekG3063finally, from now on, ...

Appears 13 times · tap a cell to see the verses

Mat 26:45Mrk 14:41Act 27:201Co 1:161Co 4:21Co 7:292Co 13:11Php 3:1Php 4:81Th 4:12Th 3:12Ti 4:8Heb 10:13
Root family
Word studyloy-PONadverb

What loipon means

as for what is left: a signpost word that turns the sentence toward whatever remains, whether the time still ahead, the last thing left to say, or one more point to add

TranslatabilityPartialCertaintyStrong

This is the adjective for "the rest" (λοιπός) frozen into a signpost. Greek could take the neuter form of that adjective and set it loose on its own, with or without "the" in front, to mean "as for what is left". Once a writer does that, the word stops describing anything and starts steering the sentence. What is left over may be time, or the last stretch of an argument, or one more item on a list, and that is why the same short word turns up in English Bibles wearing such different clothes.

So the senses below are one gesture aimed at four different leftovers:

  • the time still ahead, as in "sleep on for what is left" and "from now on there is a crown laid up"
  • the last part of a letter, as in the "finally, brothers" that opens Paul's closing sections
  • one more thing to add, as in "besides, I do not know whether I baptized anyone else"
  • the conclusion left standing, when days of storm and darkness strip away all hope

Because it points rather than describes, the word brings no weight of its own to a sentence. That is worth remembering when Paul writes "finally", because he is not promising to stop soon: he is turning to what is left, and what is left can still run for two more chapters. Readers who hear a strict announcement of the ending have sometimes concluded that Philippians must be two letters stitched together, when the word may be saying no more than "and now, moving on".

Nuances

1afrom now on, for the time that is left: pointing to the stretch of time still ahead
TranslatabilityApproximate
Mat 26:45Mrk 14:411Co 7:292Ti 4:8Heb 10:13
1bfinally, and now: marking a writer's turn to the last part of what he has to say
CertaintyContested
2Co 13:11Php 3:1Php 4:81Th 4:12Th 3:1
Php 3:1

Whether the word here announces the close of the letter ("finally") or is only a transition to a new topic ("and now, further"), and so whether Philippians shows a seam between separate letters.

  • majorityA transitional marker moving to a further matter, not a signal of closing, so no seam need be inferred.; Margaret E. Thrall, Greek Particles in the New Testament: Linguistic and Exegetical Studies; C. F. D. Moule, An Idiom Book of New Testament Greek; Peter T. O'Brien, The Epistle to the Philippians (New International Greek Testament Commentary); Gordon D. Fee, Paul's Letter to the Philippians (New International Commentary on the New Testament)
  • minorityA genuine concluding formula, so the section it opens reads as the end of a letter.; BDAG, s.v. λοιπός
1cbesides, beyond that: adding one more item to what has already been said
TranslatabilityApproximate
1Co 1:161Co 4:2
1dso then, at last: drawing a line under what has just happened
CertaintyContested
Act 27:20

What scholars say about loipon

The form is the accusative singular neuter of λοιπός used adverbially, articular or anarthrous (τὸ λοιπόν / λοιπόν), a construction attested in classical and Hellenistic Greek and frequent in the papyri, where later Koine develops an inferential force ("so, therefore"). BDAG and LSJ divide the New Testament data along four lines: temporal, "from now on, for the future" (Matt 26:45; Mark 14:41; 1 Cor 7:29; Heb 10:13; 2 Tim 4:8); transitional or concluding, "finally, as for the rest" (2 Cor 13:11; Phil 3:1; 4:8; 1 Thess 4:1; 2 Thess 3:1); additive, "beyond that, in addition" (1 Cor 1:16; 4:2); and inferential or culminative (Acts 27:20). Whether the articular form differs systematically from the anarthrous is disputed, and the New Testament distribution does not settle it: Phil 3:1, 4:8, 2 Thess 3:1 and Heb 10:13 are articular while 1 Thess 4:1, 2 Cor 13:11 and Acts 27:20 are not, yet the transitional and temporal uses appear on both sides. Thrall argued that in Phil 3:1 and comparable openings the word functions as a transitional particle rather than a marker of conclusion, a reading taken up by Moule and by most recent commentators on Philippians (O'Brien, Fee); it removes one of the main planks of the partition theories that treat Philippians as a compilation of separate letters. At 1 Cor 4:2 the text is divided between ὧδε λοιπόν and ὃ δὲ λοιπόν, with little exegetical consequence.

Sources

  • BDAG, s.v. λοιπόςlexicon
  • LSJ, s.v. λοιπόςlexicon
  • Blass, Debrunner and Funk, A Greek Grammar of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literaturegrammar
  • C. F. D. Moule, An Idiom Book of New Testament Greekgrammar
  • Margaret E. Thrall, Greek Particles in the New Testament: Linguistic and Exegetical Studiesmonograph
  • EDNT, s.v. λοιπόςdictionary
  • Peter T. O'Brien, The Epistle to the Philippians (New International Greek Testament Commentary)commentary
  • Gordon D. Fee, Paul's Letter to the Philippians (New International Commentary on the New Testament)commentary

All attested forms of λοιπόν

accusative n s

λοιπὸν, λοιπόν, Λοιπόν, Λοιπὸν

Mat 26:45, Mrk 14:41, Act 27:20, 1Co 1:16, 1Co 4:2, 2Ti 4:8, Heb 10:13, 1Co 7:29