StrongerBible

korban

κορβᾶν

GreekG2878Corban, treasury

Appears 2 times · tap a cell to see the verses

Mat 27:6Mrk 7:11
Word studyResearch-gradekor-BANnoun

What korban means

a sacred dedication to God: property or a pledge declared off-limits to ordinary human use by a binding vow

TranslatabilityUntranslatableCertaintySettled

The word entered Greek directly from Aramaic and Hebrew, where it designated the broad category of cultic offerings brought near to God. In first-century Jewish practice, however, it had narrowed to a specific legal formula: declaring something "korban" ("it is an offering") placed it under sacred status and prohibited a named person from benefiting from it, even though ownership did not transfer to the Temple. The Jebel Ḥallet eṭ-Ṭûri ossuary inscription, dating to the time of Jesus, preserves exactly this formula over the contents of a tomb, warning would-be disturbers that everything inside is "a korban to God."

The two New Testament occurrences show the word's two faces. In Mark 7:11 it is the vow formula itself, the word a son might pronounce to shield his property from his parents' claim. Mark glosses it for Greek readers as δῶρον ("gift"), the same word the Septuagint used to render the Hebrew קָרְבָּן across Leviticus and Numbers. In Matthew 27:6 the declined form κορβανᾶν (accusative of κορβανᾶς) names the Temple treasury that housed the dedicated funds. The institutional treasury takes its name from the same concept: money consecrated as an offering to God.

Nuances

1aa binding vow formula that declares property consecrated to God and therefore unusable by a named person
Mrk 7:11
1bthe Temple treasury: the institutional chest that held money and property consecrated to God
Mat 27:6

What scholars say about korban

The word κορβᾶν is a Greek transliteration of Aramaic/Hebrew קָרְבָּן, from the root meaning "to draw near." In the Hebrew Bible it is the most common and generic word for a cultic offering (Leviticus 1:2; Numbers 7). The Septuagint almost never transliterates it, preferring δῶρον, which means it re-enters Greek literature in the first century CE as a specialized legal term. Three pillars support the dominant scholarly reading of Mark 7:11: (1) Josephus uses the word for a binding vow of self-dedication as well as for the Temple treasury he calls κορβανᾶς (Antiquities 4.73; Against Apion 1.167; Jewish War 2.175); (2) the Aramaic Jebel Ḥallet eṭ-Ṭûri ossuary inscription (Herodian era, published by Fitzmyer in JBL 78 [1959]) shows the formula used as a prohibitive declaration over tomb contents; and (3) Mishnah Nedarim documents the formula as a vow mechanism and records in m. Ned. 9:1 that R. Eliezer allowed parental-honor grounds to annul such vows, a ruling the Sages eventually conceded. Moshe Benovitz (Kol Nidre, Brown Judaic Studies 315, 1998) gives the most precise legal analysis, distinguishing the dedicatory vow (which actually transferred property) from the prohibitive vow (which only created a use-prohibition). The key debate is whether Jesus attacked a real Pharisaic ruling (Baumgarten, Marcus, France, Yarbro Collins) or a marginal abuse the Pharisees would have rejected (E. P. Sanders). The ossuary evidence and the Damascus Document (CD 16:6-18) support the historical plausibility of the practice.

Where scholars disagree about korban

Whether the korban formula in Mark 7:11 reflects a real mainstream Pharisaic ruling or a fringe abuse the Pharisees themselves would have rejected.

  • majorityJesus attacked a genuine Pharisaic legal position that upheld the inviolability of korban vows even when they overrode the fifth commandment. The rabbinic permission to annul such vows for parental honor (m. Ned. 9:1) is a later development that vindicated Jesus's critique.; A. Baumgarten, "Korban and the Pharisaic Paradosis," JANES 16-17 (1984-85): 5-17; J. Marcus, Mark 1-8, Anchor Bible 27, Doubleday 2000, pp. 441-49; R. T. France, The Gospel of Mark, NIGTC, Eerdmans 2002, on 7:9-13; A. Yarbro Collins, Mark, Hermeneia, Fortress 2007, pp. 352-55
  • minorityThe Pharisees as a body would have agreed with Jesus; the Markan polemic caricatures a marginal abuse rather than mainstream Pharisaic teaching. Mechanisms for annulling korban vows that harmed parents were always available.; E. P. Sanders, Jewish Law from Jesus to the Mishnah, Trinity Press International 1990, pp. 55-57
In-depth research

This is a research paper, so it may be hard to read without scholarly background. It is useful if you want to dig even deeper into this word.

Sources

  • BDAG, s.v. κορβᾶν, p. 559lexicon
  • TDNT 3:860-66, K. H. Rengstorf, "korban, korbanas"dictionary
  • HALOT 3:1137, s.v. קָרְבָּןlexicon
  • J. A. Fitzmyer, "The Aramaic Qorban Inscription from Jebel Khallet et-Turi and Mk 7:11 / Mt 15:5," JBL 78 (1959): 60-65article
  • M. Benovitz, Kol Nidre: Studies in the Development of Rabbinic Votive Institutions, Brown Judaic Studies 315, Scholars Press 1998monograph
  • J. Marcus, Mark 1-8, Anchor Bible 27, Doubleday 2000, pp. 441-49commentary
  • A. Yarbro Collins, Mark, Hermeneia, Fortress 2007, pp. 341-55commentary
  • A. Baumgarten, "Korban and the Pharisaic Paradosis," JANES 16-17 (1984-85): 5-17article
  • E. P. Sanders, Jewish Law from Jesus to the Mishnah, Trinity Press International 1990, pp. 55-57monograph
  • R. T. France, The Gospel of Mark, NIGTC, Eerdmans 2002, on 7:9-13commentary
  • J. Milgrom, Leviticus 1-16, Anchor Bible 3, Doubleday 1991, pp. 145-48commentary

All attested forms of κορβᾶν

accusative m s

κορβανᾶν

Mat 27:6

nominative m s

κορβᾶν

Mrk 7:11