to reconcile: to restore a broken relationship, replacing hostility with friendship and peace
The word began in the marketplace, where it meant to exchange one thing for another, especially to change money from one currency into another. From there it came to mean exchanging hostility for friendship, that is, reconciling. By New Testament times it was an ordinary word for repairing a relationship that had broken down, whether between warring cities or estranged people.
Paul uses it in two settings that share one core idea: two parties who were at odds are brought back together and their hostility gives way to peace. In everyday life it describes a wife and husband setting aside their split (1 Corinthians 7:11). At the heart of the gospel it describes God restoring people to himself.
What makes Paul's use striking is the direction. In ordinary Greek, and in the Old Testament, it is usually the offended party who must be won over: the guilty side works to regain favor. Paul turns this around. God, the offended party, is the one who takes the initiative and reconciles his enemies to himself while they are still hostile. Reconciliation, for Paul, is a gift God gives, not a peace we negotiate or a favor we earn.
Nuances
Disputed
Whether reconciliation involves a change in God himself, his setting aside his own hostility toward sin, or only a change in human beings toward God.
- majorityReconciliation is bilateral: God lays aside his hostility toward sinners while the cross also breaks human hostility toward God.; C. E. B. Cranfield, Romans (ICC), 1:266-269; I. Howard Marshall, 'The Meaning of Reconciliation,' in Unity and Diversity in New Testament Theology (1978)
- minorityReconciliation addresses God's own holy opposition to sin, so it has value for God and not for us alone.; James Denney, The Death of Christ (1902); Leon Morris, The Apostolic Preaching of the Cross (3rd ed., 1965); Thomas R. Schreiner, Romans (BECNT), 261-265
- minorityGod's disposition never changes; reconciliation alters only the human side of the relationship.; Ernst Kasemann, Commentary on Romans