StrongerBible

echidna

ἔχιδνα

GreekG2191viper

Appears 5 times · tap a cell to see the verses

Mat 3:7Mat 12:34Mat 23:33Luk 3:7Act 28:3
Word studyResearch-gradeEKH-id-nahnoun

What echidna means

viper: a small, live-bearing, deadly-venomous snake, used both for the creature itself and as an insult for venomous, malignant people

TranslatabilityApproximateCertaintyStrong

This is the ordinary Greek word for a viper, a small, live-bearing, deadly-venomous snake. Four of its five appearances are the same fixed insult, "brood of vipers," thrown first by John the Baptist and then by Jesus at religious leaders and crowds alike. The fifth is a real snake that fastens on Paul's hand on a beach at Malta (Acts 28:3). The two uses are one word doing two jobs: naming the creature, and turning the creature into a picture of deadly, malignant people.

The insult carried more menace than a modern reader hears. Greek and Roman writers widely believed that young vipers killed their mother as they were born, chewing their way out of her. So "brood of vipers" did not merely mean "nasty people"; it hinted at people bred from killers, a charge that bites hardest where Jesus has just accused the leaders of descending from those who murdered the prophets.

The gospel writers also made a pointed word choice. The Greek Old Testament almost never used this word, preferring the word for "asp" (ἀσπίς) when it translated the Hebrew snake terms. By reaching instead for the classical Greek word for viper, the very term poets used for treacherous, monstrous women, they gave the rebuke the ring of sharp, cutting insult rather than routine scriptural language.

On the beach at Malta the word returns to its plain sense: an actual snake bites Paul, the onlookers wait for him to swell up and drop dead, and when he does not they decide he must be a god. Whether the creature was a true viper (Malta has none today) or another venomous snake taken for one is debated, but the word itself simply names the deadly snake everyone feared.

Nuances

1aa viper: the actual venomous snake
TranslatabilityDirect
Act 28:3
Act 28:3

Whether echidna in Acts 28:3 denotes a true viper (family Viperidae) or, more loosely, any dangerous venomous snake, given that Malta has no vipers today and no fossil evidence of them.

  • majorityA true viper, consistent with a faunal change over two millennia of dense human settlement on the island.; C. K. Barrett, The Acts of the Apostles (ICC), vol. 2, 1998, 1222-24; Joseph A. Fitzmyer, The Acts of the Apostles (Anchor Bible), 1998, 780-83
  • minorityA functionally generic term for a venomous snake, allowing a mildly venomous non-viper such as a rear-fanged colubrid actually present on Malta.; Louw-Nida, Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament Based on Semantic Domains, 4.53
1bin the fixed insult "brood of vipers": venomous, malignant people, pictured as a nest of deadly snakes
Mat 3:7Mat 12:34Mat 23:33Luk 3:7

Disputed

What background gives the insult "brood of vipers" its force in Matthew and Luke.

  • majorityProphetic invective for venomous, malignant persons, with an Old Testament backdrop (Isaiah 30:6; 59:5) of vipers and adders' eggs; the folklore of matricidal young is at most a secondary echo.; W. D. Davies and Dale C. Allison, Matthew (ICC), vol. 1, 303-4; Ulrich Luz, Matthew 1-7 (Hermeneia), 2007, 168-71; Joseph A. Fitzmyer, The Gospel According to Luke I-IX (Anchor Bible), 1981, 464-68
  • minorityA deliberate appeal to the widespread ancient folklore that vipers kill their mother in birth, so the leaders are branded the offspring of those who murder their own kin, fitting the charge in Matthew 23:29-36 that they descend from prophet-killers.; Craig S. Keener, "'Brood of Vipers' (Matthew 3.7; 12.34; 23.33)," JSNT 28 (2005): 3-11
  • minorityAn allusion to the "seed of the serpent" of Genesis 3, read by some patristic and social-scientific interpreters.; Bruce J. Malina and Richard L. Rohrbaugh, Social-Science Commentary on the Synoptic Gospels

What scholars say about echidna

Every major NT lexicon glosses echidna as "viper" (BDAG, LSJ), with LSJ tracing the classical range from a literal viper (Herodotus 3.108; Sophocles) through a metaphor for a treacherous woman (Aeschylus, Sophocles) to the proper name of the Hesiodic monster-mother (Theogony 295-336). Louw-Nida gives the broader gloss "a poisonous serpent, snake, viper," and this narrow-vs-generic split (BDAG/LSJ vs Louw-Nida) maps onto the Acts 28:3 species debate. TDNT treats the term under ophis (Foerster, V.566-582). The Old Greek never uses echidna, preferring aspis and ekgona aspidon for the Hebrew viper terms (Isa 30:6; 59:5); echidna enters only with Aquila's second-century revision at Isa 59:5, so the Gospels' choice is a non-Septuagintal reach for classical tragic register. On the "brood of vipers" idiom the majority reads prophetic invective on an Isaianic pattern (Davies & Allison, Luz, Fitzmyer, Bovon, France, Nolland, Hagner), while Keener (JSNT 28, 2005) argues from the pervasive ancient viper-matricide folklore (Herodotus 3.109; Nicander, Theriaca 128-134; Pliny, NH 10.170; Aelian, NA 1.24) that the phrase brands the leaders as offspring of kin-killers, fitting Matt 23:29-36. On Acts 28:3, readings run from historicist defense of a since-extinct Maltese viper (Bruce, Barrett, Fitzmyer, Hemer, Keener) to literary construction on Greco-Roman patterns (Haenchen, Conzelmann, Pervo) and integrated readings drawing on the shipwreck-and-viper epigram of Anthologia Palatina 7.290 and Antiphon's logic that the sea will not spare the guilty (Miles-Trompf, Litwa, de Vos).

In-depth research

This is a research paper, so it may be hard to read without scholarly background. It is useful if you want to dig even deeper into this word.

Sources

  • BDAG, A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament, 3rd ed., 2000, s.v. ἔχιδναlexicon
  • LSJ, A Greek-English Lexicon, s.v. ἔχιδναlexicon
  • Louw-Nida, Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament Based on Semantic Domains, 4.53lexicon
  • Werner Foerster, "ὄφις," TDNT V, 566-582dictionary
  • Craig S. Keener, "'Brood of Vipers' (Matthew 3.7; 12.34; 23.33)," JSNT 28 (2005): 3-11article
  • W. D. Davies and Dale C. Allison, Matthew (ICC), vol. 1, 303-4commentary
  • Ulrich Luz, Matthew 1-7 (Hermeneia), 2007, 168-71commentary
  • C. K. Barrett, The Acts of the Apostles (ICC), vol. 2, 1998, 1217-24commentary
  • Joseph A. Fitzmyer, The Acts of the Apostles (Anchor Bible), 1998, 780-83commentary
  • M. David Litwa, "Paul the 'god' in Acts 28," JBL 136 (2017): 707-26article

All attested forms of ἔχιδνα

genitive f p

ἐχιδνῶν

Mat 3:7, Mat 12:34, Mat 23:33, Luk 3:7

nominative f s

ἔχιδνα

Act 28:3