StrongerBible

de

δέ

GreekG1161but, and, ...

Appears 2945 times · tap a cell to see the verses

Mat 1:2 (2×)Mat 1:3 (3×)Mat 1:4 (3×)Mat 1:5 (3×)Mat 1:6Mat 5:19Mat 5:21Mat 5:22 (2×)Mat 5:31Mat 6:6Mat 7:15Mat 10:11Mat 10:33Mat 12:32Mat 12:47Mat 13:29Mat 16:14 (2×)Mat 16:18Mat 16:25Mat 18:6Mat 20:26Mat 21:44Mat 23:16Mat 23:18Mat 23:28Mat 25:38Mat 25:39
Root family
Names & words formed with this
Akin to
Word studyResearch-gradedehconjunction

What de means

a small connecting word that signals what comes next is a new step, development, or shift in what the writer is saying

TranslatabilityPartialCertaintyContested

δέ never stands first in its clause; it always comes second, leaning on the word ahead of it. It carries no meaning of its own. What it does instead is give the reader a cue: take what comes next as a new step or development from what just came before. That is why English translators reach for "but," "and," "now," or "then" depending on the situation. None of those English words is what δέ means; each is a stopgap that captures one effect a new step can have when it follows a particular kind of statement.

Because δέ is a cue rather than a word with content, the old labels "contrasting" and "continuing" are not meanings of the word at all. They simply describe how two clauses happen to relate in a given verse. When the two clauses are pulling against each other, the new step sounds like "but." When it is just the next thing that happens, it sounds like "and" or "now." The contrast or the addition lives in the clauses themselves, not in δέ. One major grammarian put it plainly almost a century ago: there is no built-in idea of opposition or contrast in the word.

δέ is the fourth most common word in the New Testament, turning up roughly 2,937 times. How often a writer uses it is a matter of style: Luke and Acts, Matthew, Hebrews, and Paul use it freely, while Mark uses it rarely and leans on καί instead. That heavy use of καί is a sign of Hebrew influence on how the book was composed. Outside the Bible, everyday Greek letters and documents from the same era use δέ in exactly the same way, which shows it is ordinary Greek of the period, not a special biblical habit.

Nuances

1aon its own, it introduces the next clause, sentence, or paragraph as a fresh step in the story or the argument
Mat 1:18Mat 2:1Mat 2:13Mat 2:19Mat 3:1Mat 4:12Mrk 5:11Mrk 5:14Mrk 5:19Luk 1:6Luk 15:25Luk 15:28
1bthe second half of a matched pair: the first clause is flagged by μέν, which sets up an expected follow-up, and δέ delivers it
Mat 3:11Mat 9:37Mat 13:8Mat 25:15Mat 26:41Act 14:4Rom 2:8Rom 11:22Php 1:15Heb 1:8Heb 7:8Heb 12:9

What scholars say about de

The scholarly center of gravity has shifted from treating δέ as a lexical conjunction with two senses (adversative "but" / continuative "and") to treating it as a single-function procedural discourse marker. Robertson (1934) already argued there is "no essential notion of antithesis or contrast" in δέ. The discourse-grammar tradition, represented by Levinsohn (1987, 2000), Runge (2010), Heckert (1996), Black (2002), and Fresch (2015, 2017), assigns δέ one procedural meaning: signal of new development, shift, or low-to-mid-level discontinuity. Traditional reference grammars (BDAG, Wallace, BDF) retain the adversative-vs-continuative split as a translation taxonomy. Denniston's classical study (1954) already warns that the two uses "are not always clearly to be distinguished." Extrabiblical Koine evidence (Ptolemaic papyri, LXX) confirms the same procedural function. The μέν...δέ construction is best understood as a point-counterpoint device (Runge) rather than a balanced antithesis: μέν flags that a corresponding development is coming, δέ delivers it.

Where scholars disagree about de

Whether δέ has a single procedural meaning (discourse development marker) or two distinct lexical senses (adversative "but" and continuative "and/now/then").

  • majorityδέ is a single-function procedural discourse marker signaling a new development or shift; the traditional adversative/continuative split is a translation artifact, not a description of Greek meaning.; Levinsohn, Discourse Features of New Testament Greek, 2000, ch. 5; Runge, Discourse Grammar of the Greek New Testament, 2010, pp. 28-36; Heckert, Discourse Function of Conjoiners in the Pastoral Epistles, 1996; Black, Sentence Conjunctions in the Gospel of Matthew, 2002; Fresch, Tyndale Bulletin 68.2 (2017): 313-316
  • minorityδέ carries two principal senses, adversative (but, on the other hand) and connective/continuative (and, now, then), that represent genuinely different uses the translator must choose between.; BDAG, s.v. de, pp. 213-14; Wallace, Greek Grammar Beyond the Basics, 1996, pp. 671-73
In-depth research

This is a research paper, so it may be hard to read without scholarly background. It is useful if you want to dig even deeper into this word.

Sources

  • A. T. Robertson, A Grammar of the Greek New Testament in the Light of Historical Research, 4th ed. (Nashville: Broadman, 1934), pp. 1183-88grammar
  • J. D. Denniston, The Greek Particles, 2nd ed., rev. K. J. Dover (Oxford: Clarendon, 1954), pp. 162-203grammar
  • BDAG, s.v. "delta-epsilon" (de), pp. 213-14lexicon
  • Herbert Weir Smyth, Greek Grammar, rev. Gordon M. Messing (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1956), sections 2834-2846grammar
  • Friedrich Blass and Albert Debrunner, A Greek Grammar of the New Testament, trans. Robert W. Funk (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1961), sections 447-448grammar
  • Stephen H. Levinsohn, Discourse Features of New Testament Greek, 2nd ed. (Dallas: SIL International, 2000), ch. 5, pp. 71-93commentary
  • Jakob K. Heckert, Discourse Function of Conjoiners in the Pastoral Epistles (Dallas: SIL International, 1996)commentary
  • Stephanie L. Black, Sentence Conjunctions in the Gospel of Matthew, JSNTSup 216 (Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 2002)commentary
  • Steven E. Runge, Discourse Grammar of the Greek New Testament (Bellingham, WA: Lexham / Hendrickson, 2010), ch. 2, pp. 28-36grammar
  • Christopher J. Fresch, 'Discourse Markers in the Septuagint and Early Koine Greek with Special Reference to The Twelve,' PhD diss., University of Cambridge, 2015; abstract in Tyndale Bulletin 68.2 (2017): 313-316commentary
  • Randall Buth, 'Oun, De, Kai, and Asyndeton in John's Gospel,' in Linguistics and New Testament Interpretation, ed. D. A. Black (Nashville: Broadman, 1992), pp. 144-161commentary
  • Daniel Wallace, Greek Grammar Beyond the Basics (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1996), pp. 671-73grammar
  • Anna Bonifazi, Annemieke Drummen, and Mark de Kreij, Particles in Ancient Greek Discourse, Hellenic Studies 74 (Cambridge, MA: Center for Hellenic Studies, 2016)commentary
  • Christopher J. Fresch, 'Is There an Emphatic men? A Consideration of the Particle's Development and its Function in Koine,' New Testament Studies 63.2 (2017): 261-278journal

All attested forms of δέ

conj

δὲ, δέ, δ

Mat 1:2, Mat 1:2, Mat 1:3, Mat 1:3, Mat 1:3, Mat 1:4, Mat 1:4, Mat 1:4