StrongerBible

harpagmos

ἁρπαγμός

GreekG0725robbery, a thing to be grasped, ...

Appears 1 time · tap a cell to see the verses

Php 2:6
Word studyResearch-gradehar-pag-MOSSnoun

What harpagmos means

a thing to be grasped: something one seizes, clings to, or exploits for one's own advantage

TranslatabilityPartialCertaintyContested

This word appears only once in the whole New Testament, in Philippians 2:6, and it is often called one of the hardest words in the Bible to translate. It is a rare noun built from the common verb "to seize or snatch" (ἁρπάζω), so at its root it has to do with grasping. But because the noun itself is almost never used anywhere else in Greek, its exact force in this one verse has been argued over for centuries.

The argument runs along two lines: whether the word names the ACT of seizing (robbery) or the THING seized (a prize), and, if a prize, whether Christ already held it or was reaching for something not yet his. Most scholars today read the whole phrase as a set expression. To treat something as "harpagmos" is to treat an advantage you already possess as an opportunity to exploit for your own benefit. On that reading Paul is saying that Christ, though he shared God's very nature, did not use his equality with God as a means of self-advantage, but instead emptied himself and took the place of a servant.

This reading carries real weight because the set expression assumes the advantage is already in hand: you cannot decline to exploit what you do not have. So it anchors the passage's claim that Christ genuinely possessed equality with God before he humbled himself. Older interpreters took the word as a prize "grasped" and clung to, or as "robbery," and a minority of scholars still argue that Christ refused to snatch at a status he did not yet hold. The word is closely related to the plainer noun for plunder or the act of robbing (ἁρπαγή).

Php 2:6
Php 2:6

How to construe ἁρπαγμός in Philippians 2:6: whether it names the act of seizing (raptus, "robbery"), a prize Christ already possessed and did not cling to (res rapta), a status he did not yet have and refused to snatch at (res rapienda), or, on the now-dominant reading, an advantage already at his disposal that he declined to exploit for his own benefit.

  • majorityA fixed idiom (verb of regarding plus predicate ἁρπαγμός) meaning an advantage already possessed that one declines to exploit for personal gain; since the idiom presupposes possession, Christ genuinely held equality with God but did not use it to his own advantage.; Roy W. Hoover, "The Harpagmos Enigma: A Philological Solution," Harvard Theological Review 64 (1971): 95-119; N. T. Wright, "ἁρπαγμός and the Meaning of Philippians 2:5-11," Journal of Theological Studies 37 (1986): 321-352; The Climax of the Covenant (T&T Clark, 1991), 56-98; Peter T. O'Brien, The Epistle to the Philippians, NIGTC (Eerdmans, 1991), 211-216; Gordon D. Fee, Paul's Letter to the Philippians, NICNT (Eerdmans, 1995), 202-211; Richard Bauckham, Jesus and the God of Israel (Eerdmans, 2008)
  • minorityThe word names a prize or possession Christ already had by nature and refused to cling to or flaunt (res rapta).; J. B. Lightfoot, Saint Paul's Epistle to the Philippians (Macmillan, 1868), 111, 133-137; Marvin R. Vincent, Philippians and Philemon, ICC (T&T Clark, 1897), 57-59
  • minorityThe word names something Christ did not yet possess and refused to snatch at (res rapienda), often read against Adam grasping at being like God in Genesis 3; on one form of this view the passage need not assume Christ's pre-existence.; James D. G. Dunn, Christology in the Making, 2nd ed. (Eerdmans, 1989), 114-121; Charles A. Wanamaker, "Philippians 2:6-11: Son of God or Adamic Christology?" New Testament Studies 33 (1987): 179-193; Samuel Vollenweider, "Der 'Raub' der Gottgleichheit," New Testament Studies 45 (1999): 413-433; Denny Burk, Articular Infinitives in the Greek of the New Testament (Sheffield Phoenix, 2006), 137-142
  • minorityThe active sense "robbery" (raptus): Christ did not regard equality with God as a thing wrongfully seized. This is the Old Latin and Vulgate rendering (non rapinam arbitratus est) behind the King James "thought it not robbery," now largely abandoned because it makes the verse a defensive claim about status rather than the first step of Christ's humbling.; Vulgate, Philippians 2:6 (non rapinam arbitratus est); cf. survey in Ralph P. Martin, Carmen Christi, SNTSMS 4 (Cambridge University Press, 1967), 134-142

What scholars say about harpagmos

ἁρπαγμός is a hapax legomenon in the New Testament (Phil 2:6) and one of its most contested words, virtually unattested in secular Greek apart from a few passages in Plutarch, Vettius Valens, and later Christian writers; it never occurs in the Septuagint. Grammatically, verbal nouns in -μος (nomina actionis) name the act, while those in -μα (nomina rei actae) name the result, which would make ἁρπαγμός an "act of seizing." Werner Jaeger (Hermes, 1915) argued that in Koine the two endings had partly merged, so ἁρπαγμός could stand for ἅρπαγμα ("thing seized"). Roy Hoover (HTR, 1971) closed the philological gap by showing that the whole construction (a verb of regarding plus the predicate ἁρπαγμός/ἅρπαγμα, alongside synonyms such as ἕρμαιον and εὕρημα) is a fixed idiom meaning "to treat as an opportunity to exploit," and that in every attested instance the object is already at the subject's disposal, which presupposes possession. N. T. Wright (JTS, 1986) built this into a Christological reading in which the pre-existent Christ, precisely because he was in the form of God, refused to exploit his equality with God for himself. This Hoover-Wright reading is followed by O'Brien, Fee, Silva, Bockmuehl, Fowl, Hansen, Hellerman, Bauckham, and Hurtado, and stands behind the NRSV and NIV renderings. It is not settled: C. F. D. Moule read the noun's active sense as "snatching" set against self-giving; Ralph Martin combined res rapta and res rapienda; and a counter-current (Wanamaker, Vollenweider, Burk, and, most fully, Michael Wade Martin in JBL 2016) has revived active or res rapienda readings, with Burk challenging Wright's grammar and Michael Wade Martin separating Hoover's idiom from Wright's conclusion that it entails possession. Crispin Fletcher-Louis (2023) has proposed an "abduction/marriage-seizure" background instead. The stakes are Christological: James Dunn's attempt to read the passage as an Adam Christology without a pre-existent Christ depends on the res rapienda sense, and critics (Steenburg, Hurst, Bauckham, Fee) have attacked each leg of that argument, including the claim that the Hoover idiom, if correct, structurally excludes it.

In-depth research

This is a research paper, so it may be hard to read without scholarly background. It is useful if you want to dig even deeper into this word.

Sources

  • BDAG, A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament, 3rd ed. (University of Chicago Press, 2000), s.v. ἁρπαγμόςlexicon
  • LSJ, A Greek-English Lexicon, 9th ed. (Clarendon, 1996), s.v. ἁρπαγμόςlexicon
  • Louw-Nida, Greek-English Lexicon Based on Semantic Domains (UBS, 1988), 57.236lexicon
  • Werner Foerster, "ἁρπάζω, ἅρπαγμα, ἁρπαγμός," in Theologisches Wörterbuch zum Neuen Testament I (Kohlhammer, 1933); ET TDNT I (Eerdmans, 1964), 472-474theological-dictionary
  • Moulton and Milligan, The Vocabulary of the Greek Testament (Hodder & Stoughton, 1930), s.v. ἁρπαγμόςlexicon
  • Roy W. Hoover, "The Harpagmos Enigma: A Philological Solution," Harvard Theological Review 64 (1971): 95-119article
  • Werner Jaeger, "Eine stilgeschichtliche Studie zum Philipperbrief," Hermes 50 (1915): 537-553article
  • N. T. Wright, The Climax of the Covenant: Christ and the Law in Pauline Theology (T&T Clark, 1991), 56-98monograph
  • Ralph P. Martin, Carmen Christi: Philippians 2:5-11 in Recent Interpretation, SNTSMS 4 (Cambridge University Press, 1967)monograph
  • Peter T. O'Brien, The Epistle to the Philippians, NIGTC (Eerdmans, 1991), 211-216commentary
  • Gordon D. Fee, Pauline Christology: An Exegetical-Theological Study (Hendrickson, 2007), 370-392monograph
  • James D. G. Dunn, Christology in the Making, 2nd ed. (Eerdmans, 1989), 114-121monograph
  • Michael Wade Martin, "ἁρπαγμός Revisited: A Philological Reexamination of the New Testament's 'Most Difficult Word,'" Journal of Biblical Literature 135 (2016): 175-194article
  • L. D. Hurst, "Re-Enter the Pre-existent Christ in Philippians 2.5-11?" New Testament Studies 32 (1986): 449-457article

All attested forms of ἁρπαγμός

accusative m s

ἁρπαγμὸν

Php 2:6