StrongerBible

anathematizō

ἀναθεματίζω

GreekG0332curse, bind oneself under a curse, ...

Appears 4 times · tap a cell to see the verses

Mrk 14:71Act 23:12Act 23:14Act 23:21
Root family
Names & words formed with this
Word studyResearch-gradeah-nah-theh-mah-TID-zohverb

What anathematizō means

to place under a curse: to declare in solemn words that someone, most often the speaker himself, is handed over to God for destruction

TranslatabilityPartialCertaintyStrong

The weight of this word comes from the noun behind it, the biblical term for something devoted to destruction (ἀνάθεμα). In the Greek Old Testament that noun stood for the Hebrew ban (חרם): a person, city, or object taken out of ordinary use and handed over to God, in war usually by being destroyed. So this is not a general word for cursing. To speak it over someone is to consign that person to ruin at God's hands.

In Acts the people who say it are cursing themselves. More than forty men bound themselves neither to eat nor to drink until they had killed Paul, and the oath they swore called destruction down on their own heads if they failed. Acts 23:14 piles the word on itself for force, something close to "with a curse we have cursed ourselves."

Mark 14:71 is different, and it is the only place in the Bible where this verb has no stated object. Peter began to curse and to swear that he did not know Jesus. The verb paired with it there is the ordinary word for taking an oath (ὄμνυμι); this one supplies the curse that makes such an oath binding. Whether Peter called destruction down on himself if he was lying, or cursed Jesus to prove he was no follower of his, is genuinely argued, and both readings have strong defenders. Matthew tells the same scene with a harsher sounding relative of this word (καταναθεματίζω).

Nuances

1ato bind oneself under a curse: to swear an oath that calls destruction down on the one swearing it if the promise is broken
Act 23:12Act 23:14Act 23:21
1bto break into cursing without saying who is cursed
CertaintyContested
Mrk 14:71
Mrk 14:71

Whom Peter curses in Mark 14:71, where the verb uniquely has no stated object.

  • majorityPeter curses himself, swearing that destruction may fall on him if he is lying: the oath formula behind renderings such as "he began to call down curses on himself."; BDAG, s.v. ἀναθεματίζω; LSJ, s.v. ἀναθεματίζω; Adela Yarbro Collins, Mark (Hermeneia; Minneapolis: Fortress, 2007), 708; Jacek Pietrzak, The Biblical Annals 9/2 (2019), on Mark 14:71
  • minorityThe unexpressed object is Jesus: under pressure Peter cursed his master, the strongest available way of dissociating himself from him.; Otto J. F. Seitz, "Peter's 'Profanity': Mark 14:71 in the Light of Matthew 16:22," Studia Evangelica (TU 73, 1959), 516-519; H. Merkel, "Peter's Curse," in The Trial of Jesus: Cambridge Studies in Honour of C. F. D. Moule (London: SCM, 1970), 66-71; G. W. H. Lampe, "Peter's Denial," Bulletin of the John Rylands Library 55/2 (1973); Raymond E. Brown, The Death of the Messiah (New York: Doubleday, 1994), 1:604, 625-626; R. T. France, The Gospel of Mark (NIGTC; Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2002), 622

What scholars say about anathematizō

This verb is almost entirely a Jewish and Christian Greek word. Behm (TDNT 1:353-356) traces its force from the noun ἀνάθεμα, which the Septuagint used to render Hebrew חרם, the ban; the verb renders the hiphil of חרם thirteen times in the LXX (Numbers 18:14; 21:2, 3; Deuteronomy 13:16; 20:17; Joshua 6:21; Judges 1:17; 21:11; 1 Samuel 15:3; 2 Kings 19:11; 1 Chronicles 4:41; Ezra 10:8; Daniel [Theodotion] 11:44), twelve of them commands of annihilation, only Numbers 18:14 carrying the neutral sense of a thing simply set apart. Outside the Septuagint and dependent literature the negative sense is attested essentially only on curse tablets (the Megara defixio, IG III.3 App. XIVb 17; Tab.Defix.Aud. 41 B), which BDAG and Moulton-Milligan both cite. BDAG divides the New Testament data into a transitive sense, put under a curse (ἀναθεματίζω ἑαυτόν, Acts 23:12, 14, 21), and an intransitive one, curse (Mark 14:71); LSJ agrees, listing Mark 14:71 as its example of the intransitive use. On Acts 23 the commentators (Bruce, Barrett, Keener, Witherington) read ἀναθέματι ἀνεθεματίσαμεν ἑαυτούς as a Semitic cognate-dative intensive of the cherem oath, comparing the rabbinic dictum that a cherem is an oath and oath forms such as 1 Kings 19:2. Mark 14:71 is the contested datum: Seitz (1959) and Merkel (1970), followed by Lampe (1973), Brown (Death of the Messiah 1:604, 625-626) and France (NIGTC, 622), argue for a suppressed object, Jesus, with Pliny's letter to Trajan (Ep. 10.96) on Christians compelled to curse Christ as the closest parallel and the criterion of embarrassment as a supporting argument; Collins (Hermeneia, 708) and Pietrzak (Biblical Annals 9/2, 2019) keep the reflexive reading, Pietrzak adding an echo of the Watchers' mutual oath in 1 Enoch 6:4-6. Matthew 26:74 substitutes καταθεματίζω (Textus Receptus καταναθεματίζω), a biblical hapax that Davies-Allison, France and others treat as a synonym with an intensive or hostile prefix.

In-depth research

This is a research paper, so it may be hard to read without scholarly background. It is useful if you want to dig even deeper into this word.

Sources

  • BDAG, s.v. ἀναθεματίζωlexicon
  • LSJ, s.v. ἀναθεματίζω and ἀνάθεμαlexicon
  • Johannes Behm, "ἀνάθεμα, ἀνάθημα, ἀναθεματίζω," TDNT 1:353-356theological-dictionary
  • J. H. Moulton and G. Milligan, The Vocabulary of the Greek Testament (London: Hodder and Stoughton, 1930), s.v. ἀνάθεμαlexicon
  • Adolf Deissmann, Light from the Ancient East (London: Hodder and Stoughton, 1927)monograph
  • F. F. Bruce, The Book of the Acts (NICNT, rev. ed.; Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1988), on Acts 23:12-14commentary
  • C. K. Barrett, The Acts of the Apostles (ICC; Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1998), on Acts 23:12-14commentary
  • Craig S. Keener, Acts: An Exegetical Commentary (Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2012-2015), on Acts 23:12-21commentary
  • Ben Witherington III, The Acts of the Apostles: A Socio-Rhetorical Commentary (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1998), on Acts 23:12commentary
  • Adela Yarbro Collins, Mark (Hermeneia; Minneapolis: Fortress, 2007), 708commentary
  • R. T. France, The Gospel of Mark (NIGTC; Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2002), 622commentary
  • Raymond E. Brown, The Death of the Messiah (New York: Doubleday, 1994), 1:604, 625-626monograph
  • Otto J. F. Seitz, "Peter's 'Profanity': Mark 14:71 in the Light of Matthew 16:22," Studia Evangelica (TU 73, 1959), 516-519article
  • H. Merkel, "Peter's Curse," in The Trial of Jesus: Cambridge Studies in Honour of C. F. D. Moule (London: SCM, 1970), 66-71essay
  • G. W. H. Lampe, "Peter's Denial," Bulletin of the John Rylands Library 55/2 (1973)article
  • Jacek Pietrzak, The Biblical Annals 9/2 (2019), on Mark 14:71article
  • Leon J. Wood, "חרם," TWOT 1:324-325theological-dictionary
  • W. D. Davies and Dale C. Allison, The Gospel According to Saint Matthew (ICC; Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1988-1997), on Matthew 26:74commentary

All attested forms of ἀναθεματίζω

aorist active indicative 3p

ἀνεθεμάτισαν

Act 23:12, Act 23:21

aorist active indicative 1p

ἀνεθεματίσαμεν

Act 23:14

present active infinitive

ἀναθεματίζειν

Mrk 14:71