StrongerBible

anazōpureō

ἀναζωπυρέω

GreekG0329fan into flame, rekindle, ...

Appears 1 time · tap a cell to see the verses

2Ti 1:6
Compound of
Word studyResearch-gradean-ad-zoh-poo-REH-ohverb

What anazōpureō means

to fan a dying ember back into open flame; to revive something that has cooled or grown faint

TranslatabilityApproximateCertaintyStrong

The picture behind this word is a coal still glowing under the ashes, brought back to a blaze by stirring it and breathing on it. Greek writers used it for both a literal fire and, far more often, for things like courage, love, faith, or morale that had faded and now flare up again. The word carries the sense of bringing back to full strength something that had slipped to a low ebb.

It appears only once in the New Testament, in Paul's charge to Timothy to keep the gift God placed in him burning at full strength (2 Timothy 1:6). Because there is a single occurrence and a single shade of meaning, the word is treated as one sense.

What is genuinely debated is not what the word means but what Paul implies by using it: whether Timothy's gift had actually cooled and needed reviving, or whether Paul simply urges him to keep tending a flame that is still burning. That question is recorded in the dispute below; the core image of reviving a faltering fire is agreed on all sides.

2Ti 1:6

Disputed

Whether Paul's word implies that Timothy's gift had actually cooled and needed reviving, or simply that he should keep an already-burning flame at full strength.

  • contestedThe gift had genuinely grown faint. Everywhere else this verb describes something that had lapsed before being revived, and Paul's mention of a spirit of fear in the next verse fits a flagging Timothy who needs stirring up.; Luke Timothy Johnson, The First and Second Letters to Timothy (Anchor Bible); Jerome D. Quinn and William C. Wacker, The First and Second Letters to Timothy (Eerdmans Critical Commentary)
  • contestedNo cooling is implied. The continuous form of the verb and the warm thanksgiving for Timothy's sincere faith point to encouragement to keep doing what he is already doing, not a rebuke of failure.; William D. Mounce, Pastoral Epistles (Word Biblical Commentary); George W. Knight III, The Pastoral Epistles (New International Greek Testament Commentary)
  • contestedA middle reading: the word here means to fan fully into flame rather than to rekindle from cold, a pastoral spur to renewed vigor under pressure that neither accuses Timothy of failure nor merely encourages a thriving disciple.; I. Howard Marshall, The Pastoral Epistles (International Critical Commentary); Philip H. Towner, The Letters to Timothy and Titus (New International Commentary on the New Testament)

What scholars say about anazōpureō

The lexicons converge on a core sense of "rekindle, kindle afresh" (LSJ; BDAG; Louw-Nida 14.66; Thayer; Abbott-Smith), built on the noun zopyron, a living coal or the bellows that revives one. The verb is a literary-register Koine compound attested from Euripides onward; Moulton-Milligan call it "a characteristic compound of the Pastorals" yet vouched for in the common speech of the day, and TDNT has no dedicated entry, marking it as a vivid metaphor rather than a technical term. The Septuagint controls how a first-century reader would hear it: at Genesis 45:27 the verb renders the reviving of Jacob's collapsed spirit, and at 1 Maccabees 13:7 the rallying of a frightened people, both intransitive and both describing a state that had genuinely lapsed. Spicq's Theological Lexicon of the New Testament assembles the fullest Hellenistic dossier (Josephus, Plutarch, Philo), and Larry Perkins concludes that across the parallels the revived element "had already been in existence, but for some reason had lapsed or faded." The interpretive divide over 2 Timothy 1:6 turns less on the verb than on aspect and context: Mounce and Knight read the present infinitive as continuous encouragement, while Johnson, Quinn-Wacker, Marshall, and Towner weight the consistently restorative background. Aspect theorists (Porter, Fanning, Wallace, Campbell) agree the present conveys imperfective, characteristic action but does not by itself prove the gift had cooled. James Barr's caution against the etymologizing fallacy, extended by Silva and Carson, restrains pressing the "life-fire-again" components as independent argument.

In-depth research

This is a research paper, so it may be hard to read without scholarly background. It is useful if you want to dig even deeper into this word.

Sources

  • BDAG, s.v. ἀναζωπυρέωlexicon
  • LSJ, s.v. ἀναζωπυρέωlexicon
  • Louw-Nida, Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament Based on Semantic Domains, 14.66lexicon
  • Ceslas Spicq, Theological Lexicon of the New Testament, s.v. ἀναζωπυρέωdictionary
  • James Hope Moulton and George Milligan, The Vocabulary of the Greek Testament, s.v. ἀναζωπυρέωlexicon
  • I. Howard Marshall, The Pastoral Epistles (International Critical Commentary)commentary
  • William D. Mounce, Pastoral Epistles (Word Biblical Commentary)commentary
  • James Barr, The Semantics of Biblical Languagemonograph

All attested forms of ἀναζωπυρέω

present active infinitive

ἀναζωπυρεῖν

2Ti 1:6